FOX slipped ?

Grendel · Post by **Grendel** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:54 pm

http://www.wicz.com/news2005/viewarticle.asp?a=291

Found that interesting from more than one aspect..

Iceman · Post by **Iceman** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:17 pm

Loose Change is a documentary made by three SUNY Oneonta Students. Dylan Avery, Korey Rowe and Jason Bermas focusing on what they call a mystery surrounding the September Eleventh Attacks.

Thursday Night, we showed you Loose Change's claim that the World Trade Center collapse was due to a controlled demolition, and supported that theory with visual evidence and witness testimony from the film.

But now, we focus on the Pentagon attack. The documentary questions how a 155 feet long Boeing 757 aircraft with a 124 ft wingspan can crash into a building leaving only a 16 foot hole and at the same time, vaporize on impact? The film states the official explanation is the intense heat from the jet fuel vaporized the entire plane. However, Dylan Avery, the writer and director of Loose Change says, ?if you look back through aviation history, there has never been a single instance where a plane has disappeared on impact?.

Shortly after the attacks, a video of what appeared to be Osama Bin Laden surfaced on American television. Loose Change points out that the man in the video acts nothing like Bin Laden. The film bases that claim on a Bin Laden video released following the attacks. In the video Bin Laden writes a letter with his right hand and is wearing a gold ring. FBI documents state Bin Laden is left handed not right and that wearing gold jewelry is against Islamic Law

The creators say it?s only more evidence of who is really responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Film producer Korey Rowe says his experience serving the military for 12 months in Iraq and 6 months in Afghanistan, leads him to believe first hand that we are not fighting a war on terror. ?If you ask any Iraqi, why we are there they will say Oil, and political power for President Bush and his administration to do anything they choose under the pretense of terror? Rowe states.

I find nothing about Fox in this article. Splain?

Grendel · Post by **Grendel** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 7:04 pm

wicz.com = FOX40

Sarge · Post by **Sarge** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:35 pm

You mean we really didn't put men on the Moon?

Uh, wait a minute...

fyrephlie · Post by **fyrephlie** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 12:08 am

since when was FOX considered a news source?

roid · Post by **roid** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 12:47 am

iiiiinteresting, sure seems like an editorial slipup, or some crossed editorial wires.
ever seen them play anything like this before?

i mean, i seriously doubt covering anything like this would have been suggested in "the day's memo", know what i mean?

Repo Man · Post by **Repo Man** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 12:48 am

fyrephlie wrote:since when was FOX considered a news source?

I was going to say something, but...oh, never mind!

CUDA · Post by **CUDA** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 9:11 am

heh a documentary written by students, kinda Michael Mooreish, and we ALL know what a wealth of information students and MM can be

and the title of the thread is a little miss-leading it was reported by a LOCAL station not by FOX

Iceman · Post by **Iceman** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 9:46 am

LOL I love witch hunts

Mobius · Post by **Mobius** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 2:34 pm

I love these conspiracy theories. But the only thing you ever have to remember about any of them, is what G. Gordon Liddy said once in an interview: "Two people can keep a secret, but only if one of them is dead."

Expecting tens, hundreds, or even thousands of people to quiet about something they know, is not logical.

Mobius · Post by **Mobius** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 2:36 pm

double post.

Zuruck · Post by **Zuruck** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 2:53 pm

CUDA wrote:heh a documentary written by students, kinda Michael Mooreish, and we ALL know what a wealth of information students and MM can be and the title of the thread is a little miss-leading it was reported by a LOCAL station not by FOX

Well, Cuda, it's "misleading", so maybe the students aren't quite as dumb as you thought?? Interesting article, there are plenty of things you could think about on that day, but it's done, the WTC is gone as are about 3000 American lives. We should fire Bush.

CUDA · Post by **CUDA** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 3:32 pm

Zuruck wrote:
CUDA wrote:heh a documentary written by students, kinda Michael Mooreish, and we ALL know what a wealth of information students and MM can be and the title of the thread is a little miss-leading it was reported by a LOCAL station not by FOX
Well, Cuda, it's "misleading", so maybe the students aren't quite as dumb as you thought?? Interesting article, there are plenty of things you could think about on that day, but it's done, the WTC is gone as are about 3000 American lives. We should fire Bush.

ah yes I forgot just like in WW2 we staged the whole thing just to get into the war

Zurich just a little bit of information for you, all the Worlds problems are NOT Bush's fault and as much as you like to blame him for EVERYTHING will not change that fact. we all know you hate Bush, and thats your right. but if your going to fire Bush for the war then I suggest you fire EVERYONE that voted in favor of it, well at least before they voted against it

so that means that 77 Senators and 293 house reps should be looking for new jobs. and if for 1 second you believe ANY of that "documentary" that says they demolished the world trade center on purpose then you need psychiatric help. it take weeks of setup and planning to demolish a building not a few hours. dont be so naieve

Zuruck · Post by **Zuruck** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 3:47 pm

Eh..not going to hijack this thread. I think we should fire him just for incompetence...forget about the war.

CUDA · Post by **CUDA** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:19 pm

well look on the bright side his term is up in 08

Palzon · Post by **Palzon** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:53 pm

I haven't seen this film or read about it. I haven't yet been convinced by similar arguments regarding the Pentagon plane disintegrating.

However, Alex Jones has convinced me that there is a lot of fishiness surrounding the collapse of the building known as WTC #7. Seriously, check into it yourselves.

woodchip · Post by **woodchip** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:59 pm

Interesting how the fourth plane is not mentioned.

CUDA · Post by **CUDA** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 6:18 pm

woodchip wrote:Interesting how the fourth plane is not mentioned.

thats because there really was no forth plane

all the smoke in that field was a farmer doing a crop burn

dissent · Post by **dissent** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 7:54 pm

Heck, I thought we were gonna get the military to invade Washington DC. Shucks, and I got my trusty flintlock all cleaned up and everything ...

dissent · Post by **dissent** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 7:56 pm

Heh. Korey Rowe is actually a clever pseudonym for Karl Rove. Talk about disinformation ...

Lothar · Post by **Lothar** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 11:43 pm

dissent wrote:Heh. Korey Rowe is actually a clever pseudonym for Karl Rove. Talk about disinformation ... :P

See, that's what I thought... but I decided to keep my mouth shut until my next VRWC check came through.

By the way... the magazine Popular Mechanics did a good job shooting down the most common 9/11 conspiracy theories.

Palzon, do you mean this Alex Jones? I tried searching for his info on WTC#7, but the site is filled with some wacky stuff and the WTC#7 article is nowhere to be found. I hope you were being sarcastic, but if not, please link to an article so I don't have to dig through that nutty site any more.

MD-2389 · Post by **MD-2389** » Mon Dec 19, 2005 12:37 am

Lothar wrote:I hope you were being sarcastic, but if not, please link to an article so I don't have to dig through that nutty site any more.

If you do a search on video.google.com, you'll find what he's talking about. Its posted in two parts, and narrirated by some dude that sounds like that AV geek off of Family Guy.