Duper [url=http://www.descentbb.net/viewtopic.php?p=257460#257460](here)[/url] wrote:are we still in the space age?
LETS TALK ABOUT SPACE
Duper [url=http://www.descentbb.net/viewtopic.php?p=257460#257460](here)[/url] wrote:are we still in the space age?
The capability gives our era the title of "space age". Just like a man who's killed once is given the title "armed and dangerous" even though he might not kill again. We can go into space but we chose not to.roid wrote:Duper [url=http://www.descentbb.net/viewtopic.php?p=257460#257460](here)[/url] wrote:are we still in the space age?
LETS TALK ABOUT SPACE
x2Bet51987 wrote:Since I'm a realist and humanist I would say there is no space age as far as the human exploration of space is concerned. The distances are too great, the environment is too hostile, the human body is too frail, and the costs would be astronomical to consider any manned mission beyond our own moon, and even a return to the moon would be a pointless waste of money that could be used to pay down the national debt and make life a little easier for life here on earth.
Since the ungodly vastness of space makes us prisoners of our own environment, and with humans still having an insatiable curiosity for the workings of the universe, we can still explore cheaply with unmanned probes and telescopes which I've always been interested in.
Bettina
Sounds like the arguments against exploring the "New World".Bettina wrote:Since I'm a realist and humanist I would say there is no space age as far as the human exploration of space is concerned. The distances are too great, the environment is too hostile, the human body is too frail, and the costs would be astronomical to consider any manned mission beyond our own moon, and even a return to the moon would be a pointless waste of money that could be used to pay down the national debt and make life a little easier for life here on earth.
Wait, you think there should be an industry to mine asteroids? Has Descent taught you nothing?!Kilarin wrote:But mining the asteroid belt is a no brainer.
x2!Lothar wrote:Space is freaking COOL.
Ha!vision wrote:Wait, you think there should be an industry to mine asteroids? Has Descent taught you nothing?!
Quite possible, but it appears that the government won't EVER be able to handle it.ThunderBunny wrote:I don't think private companies are going to be the answer for extraterrestrial colonization - at least not for decades if not a century or two.
Only because the people with the backyard rockets have been legislated out of business. You are absolutely correct that it can't be done SAFELY. Exploration never is. But it CAN be done. (For comparison, ask yourself how "safe" early airplane development was)ThunderBunny wrote:Manned space exploration is either a national or international undertaking. It isn't a backyard proposition. Massive resources must be used- and without expectation of any kind of meaningful return for many decades.
yeah.....uh....Behemoth wrote:I agree with bettina, There is no suitable need to explore any further than what's in our immediate reach.
True. The socialist way is the only way.ThunderBunny wrote: That aside, I don't think private companies are going to be the answer for extraterrestrial colonization - at least not for decades if not a century or two.
Private interests not only need to be able to support the monumental costs and risks associated with manned space exploration, they have to do it at a profit. Gains have to be made on a reportable quarterly statement- something just out of the question when it comes to sending a man into space in any kind of a "safe" situation.
Sure, let's just move our pollution from one place to another, Great idea!Isaac wrote:yeah.....uh....Behemoth wrote:I agree with bettina, There is no suitable need to explore any further than what's in our immediate reach.
Let's pretend we could move all factories into space. Wouldn't that lower pollution levels in our ecosystem? Wouldn't that make it cheaper for companies who had to spend lots of money to make their companies be cleaner?
Imagine if all the most toxic manufacturing jobs were done on Mars?
Sure it's expensive to move to these locations, but after a few hundred years of NO environmental regulation, taxes, or anything else that makes it cost more to stay on Earth, it would pay off.
That's just the tip of the iceberg of the benefits from space.
Omg... I know pollution is a bad thing to spread. But who cares if it's in an environment that can't sustain life anyway?Behemoth wrote:Sure, let's just move our pollution from one place to another, Great idea!Isaac wrote:yeah.....uh....Behemoth wrote:I agree with bettina, There is no suitable need to explore any further than what's in our immediate reach.
Let's pretend we could move all factories into space. Wouldn't that lower pollution levels in our ecosystem? Wouldn't that make it cheaper for companies who had to spend lots of money to make their companies be cleaner?
Imagine if all the most toxic manufacturing jobs were done on Mars?
Sure it's expensive to move to these locations, but after a few hundred years of NO environmental regulation, taxes, or anything else that makes it cost more to stay on Earth, it would pay off.
That's just the tip of the iceberg of the benefits from space.
Did you? Here you go smart guy: http://www.starbase1.co.uk/sfplanet.jpgDuper wrote:dude.. THINK before you talk.
I would tend to think definitely not.Isaac wrote:Wouldn't that make it cheaper for companies who had to spend lots of money to make their companies be cleaner?
I think you're right about me, but you have to remember the only thing that makes space travel expensive is leaving Earth's gravity. All we have to do is find a cheaper way. Space elevator!!!!!Sergeant Thorne wrote:I would tend to think definitely not.Isaac wrote:Wouldn't that make it cheaper for companies who had to spend lots of money to make their companies be cleaner?
In the foreseeable future I don't see any profit in space colonization outside of scientific research. You've probably heard me say it before, but I think that people absorb way too much in reading science-fiction novels, to the degree that they begin to use it unconsciously in their reasoning.
Obama didn't decrease the NASA budget, he increased it.Kilarin wrote:I'll put in a plug for Obama here. He's certainly not my favorite president, but cutting the NASA budget and being more open to private industry in space is probably the BEST thing that could ever happen to our space program.
Sorry, I should have said he cut the Constellation program in favor of encouraging private enterprise to build space taxis.roid wrote:Obama didn't decrease the NASA budget, he increased it.
Sergeant Thorne wrote:You've probably heard me say it before, but I think that people absorb way too much in reading science-fiction novels, to the degree that they begin to use it unconsciously in their reasoning.
We've lived this long without the need to, May i ask by what reasoning do you think this?PJB wrote:Learning how to travel the stars is vital to the continuation of mankind. Well... at some point it will be.
HAHAHA. Fail.Behemoth wrote:We've lived this long without the need to, May i ask by what reasoning do you think this?PJB wrote:Learning how to travel the stars is vital to the continuation of mankind. Well... at some point it will be.