DescentBB

Zuruck wrote:...oh please Will...Clinton should have never been under oath to explain his personal life...

No. He was under oath because he was named as the defendant in a law suit.
At which point does a president get to lie under oath to avoid the legal system? Is it anything involving sex?
Only if the sex wasn't really sex because it was a blowjob?
Only if the president is a democrat?

Or maybe you meant all people are allowed to lie to get out of sexual harrasment lawsuits....or just men....or all people who only have oral sex....
So confusing!

Please clarify but stick to the facts when you explain it don't rely on talking points.

I ... did not ... have sex ... with that woman !!
- William Jefferson Clinton

Flabby Chick wrote:There's people dying in Somalia from lack of water. Iraq,Iran,Hamas,bird flu,Russian gas,enviroment,Brad and Angelina!! :P

But we gotta see LeBron's latest highlite-reel dunk! Don't bug me about that other stuff. Except Brad and Aneglina, provided they were in the audience of the Cavs game.

-----

What's sad about all of this... I'd be one of the first ones to be making fun of any politician, from any political party, having this sort of hunting accident. Nobody got killed, severely injured, or spent any considerable time in excessive pain, so it's fair game for jokes. But it loses its entertainment value pretty fast when it turns into a conspiracy theory or yet another Republican-bashing fest, or when it runs on the front page 3 days in a row with tons of "expert" commentary about how the response was too slow, there might be a coverup, blah blah blah. This would be way more entertaining if CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, the New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, the BBC, the local paper, Mobi, Zuruck, Will, me, and that guy on the corner would all shut up and stop trying to give any sort of serious commentary about this. This should be left as fodder for Leno, Letterman, Conan, and the local class clown, not treated as yet another occasion for partisan bickering.