XKPyroGT2007
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:38 pm
M
G
It's a ricer.
Nice render
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 1:47 am
O
M
G
It's a ricer.
Nice render
M
G
It's a ricer.
Nice render
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:21 am
lol as if they HAVE rice in the future! 
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:37 am
heh, looks like it will go down with one shot! Where is the armor?
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 2:55 pm
A nOOb with a Vauss cannon could knock off one of the wings...
Nice pic, better than what I could do...
Nice pic, better than what I could do...
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:17 pm
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:27 pm
wtf? knitting needles?
Re:
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:34 pm
aaw, don't cry. you did a great job. I could never do that. But it doesn't look suitable as a fighter.Isaac wrote:
Re:
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 6:54 pm
oh sure. Don't forget the great "rice/Soy war" of 2134. A better part of Asia was swollowoed up by the sea in that one.Isaac wrote:lol as if they HAVE rice in the future!
Re:
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:29 pm
I'm sowry... Your fighter looks cool. I admit...Isaac wrote:
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:49 pm
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:03 pm
I think its beautiful. You did a great job and I printed it out to hang on my wall...
Bee
Bee
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:05 pm
Holy cow!
It looks...Awesome!
It looks...Awesome!
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:44 am
Thanks alot, everyone! You all made my day! I'm not joking.
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 4:15 pm
It's my laptop's desktop background at the moment, and THAT's saying something
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 5:06 pm
Nice job. Great canopy. Lasers are far too small! Need 4 of'em too. Imagine a fart muffler and a type-r sticker...
Overall, slight more bulk would make that look good. (Not that it doesn't already look good, but for my preference...)
Overall, slight more bulk would make that look good. (Not that it doesn't already look good, but for my preference...)
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 5:44 pm
i think im going to have to make new version that looks like it was manufactured by peterbuilt.
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 6:40 pm
that should have been in d3.
Re:
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 7:24 pm
About what i said in my last post?Ferno wrote:that should have been in d3.
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 7:32 pm
I think I would change the white on the sides to a blue neon like some computers have. Night lighting would be Kool.
Bee
Bee
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 8:39 pm
That is slick.
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 11:21 am
tank you all!
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:52 pm
thats nice man, i want to learn to do some stuff like that...what do you use?
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:49 pm
If you know how to model you can make this. What makes it look real is the GI lighting and the raytrace reflections.
The ship is just a box, beat to crap till it looked right.
The ship is just a box, beat to crap till it looked right.
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 3:59 pm
Not bad. Looks too ricey though. What are the tailfins for exactly? They look pointless. I know tailfins are pretty much pointless on any Descent ship. However, on the GX, at least they functioned as some really nasty looking missile racks. The wings usually function as gun racks. Looks nice but it needs some armor. The wings and fins look more like ugly riceboy spoilers.
I might also mention the idea of having the canopy opening from the side. It would give more room for the pilot to get out of the ship and looks cool. I've actually been wanting to do that with one of my ships at some point. I know two-seater, harriers do that for the passenger seat. Otherwise I'm gonna have to deduct another point for comfort.
I might also mention the idea of having the canopy opening from the side. It would give more room for the pilot to get out of the ship and looks cool.
I've actually been wanting to do that with one of my ships at some point. I know two-seater, harriers do that for the passenger seat. Otherwise I'm gonna have to deduct another point for comfort.