Page 1 of 1

three's company

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:15 pm
by CUDA
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/20 ... p=features

Report: Woman has surgery to get a third breast, hopes to become a TV star

:huh:

Re: three's company

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:49 pm
by callmeslick
wow. :shock:

Re: three's company

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:55 pm
by Tunnelcat
Gross. More of something isn't always better. She looks like a cow too. Hope she doesn't tip over either. 2 is bad enough, three is front heavy. It would be like a man having 2 sets of testicle sacks installed. Just more soft areas to worry about getting smacked. :wink:

Re: three's company

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:22 pm
by Foil
tunnelcat wrote:It would be like a man having 2 sets of testicle sacks installed. Just more soft areas to worry about getting smacked. :wink:
No need to have it surgically done... it can happen in nature.

Re: three's company

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:32 pm
by CUDA
this thread is an utter disaster :mrgreen:

Re: three's company

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:32 pm
by CUDA
if I was her I'd be UTTERLY embarrassed :mrgreen:

Re: three's company

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 3:24 pm
by callmeslick
I think you're groping for UDDERS, CUDA(for pun value).

Re: three's company

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 4:14 pm
by CUDA
:P


just trying to take a break from the usual BS of this forum :mrgreen:

Re: three's company

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 4:52 pm
by Foil
Well, it got a good chuckle from me. :lol:

Re: three's company

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 4:57 pm
by Ferno
Little did I know that scene in total recall was a precursor to this.

Re: three's company

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 5:34 pm
by Tunnelcat
Foil wrote:
tunnelcat wrote:It would be like a man having 2 sets of testicle sacks installed. Just more soft areas to worry about getting smacked. :wink:
No need to have it surgically done... it can happen in nature.
That looks like multiple testicles in ONE scrotum. I'm talking about 4 testicles carried in 2 separate sacks, or scrotums. Haven't been able to find that one and I doubt most men would want a couple of scrotums hanging down there anyway. Not a lot of room down there. :P
CUA wrote:this thread is an utter disaster :mrgreen:
What did you expect? A serious discussion about stupid women and boobs? :P

Re: three's company

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 5:54 pm
by Will Robinson
I always thought the scrotum was proof that design can't be flawlessly intelligent even if it was done on a divine drawing board.

Note from the average guy design team: Make it internal, work out the cooling some other way...thanks!

Re: three's company

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 6:03 pm
by Tunnelcat
Will Robinson wrote:I always thought the scrotum was proof that design can't be flawlessly intelligent even if it was done on a divine drawing board.

Note from the average guy design team: Make it internal, work out the cooling some other way...thanks!
It's the same with boobs. I'd like them internal too. They hang in the way, are just a sensitive to getting hit and are sometimes quite painful when the hormones are just right, especially after menopause. As for the male scrotum, you should be thankful that the designer didn't hang it from your chin like a turkey's dewlap. :lol:

Re: three's company

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 6:14 pm
by CUDA
YA but if they are internal then we cant play with them :rant:

Re: three's company

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:45 am
by Tunnelcat
CUDA wrote:YA but if they are internal then we cant play with them :rant:
Last I heard, the designer made boobs for babies to use, not playtime. Only human males play with them. :P

Re: three's company

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:52 am
by CUDA
Men and their toys :wink:

Re: three's company

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 2:09 pm
by Tunnelcat
Come to think of it, it seems only humans have large prominent breasts when they're NOT lactating, so I guess it IS a sexual signal. But verily, I shouldn't complain. At least human women don't develop those large, red butt pads like many female apes do when in estrus. All because we walk upright now. :lol:

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Why-Do-W ... 6783.shtml

Re: three's company

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:45 am
by Herculosis

Re: three's company

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:47 am
by callmeslick
saw that this morning, Herc......'Third Breast Exposed....' jumps out at you, in print! :lol:

Re: three's company

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:04 pm
by Tunnelcat
Yeah, I figured it was. No boob job looks that good, especially when trying to ADD an extra one. They always look fake or there's some scar tissue showing.