Page 1 of 1

Ow ow ow!!

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 8:12 am
by Admiral Thrawn

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 8:49 am
by CUDA
O_o

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:25 am
by Iceman
I have to call BS on that one ...

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:53 am
by Krom
o_O WTF?

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:05 am
by Palzon
The fark comedy tag is priceless:

"Suddenly, painting your face seems tame by comparison."

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:08 am
by Flabby Chick
It's The Sun guys. Not the brighter side of UK Journalism.

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:40 am
by TheCope
that story got me totally aroused...

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:18 am
by Robo
Flabby Chick wrote:It's The Sun guys. Not the brighter side of UK Journalism.
Ow ow ow.

Really not surprising that the Sun has printed/displayed this.

Having all my family tied into Liverpool very strongly I don't even regard The Sun as a newspaper, it's just printed crap on paper. It's not journalism, it's ★■◆●.

Most of you will not know what Liverpool has anything to do with hating The Sun. It's actually due to the Hillborough football tradegy that happened over 15 years go. Here's a bit of info on it..
The Sun newspaper

On the Wednesday following the disaster, Kelvin MacKenzie, then editor of The Sun, a British tabloid newspaper owned by Rupert Murdoch, used the front page headline 'THE TRUTH', with three sub-headlines: 'Some fans picked pockets of victims'; 'Some fans urinated on the brave cops'; 'Some fans beat up PC giving kiss of life'.

The story accompanying these headlines claimed that 'drunken Liverpool fans viciously attacked rescue workers as they tried to revive victims' and 'police officers, firemen and ambulance crew were punched, kicked and urinated upon'. A quote, attributed to an unnamed policeman, claimed that a dead girl had been abused and that Liverpool fans 'were openly urinating on us and the bodies of the dead'.

In their history of The Sun, Peter Chippendale and Chris Horrie wrote:

'As MacKenzie's layout was seen by more and more people, a collective shudder ran through the office [but] MacKenzie's dominance was so total there was nobody left in the organisation who could rein him in except Murdoch. [Everyone] seemed paralysed, "looking like rabbits in the headlights", as one hack described them. The error staring them in the face was too glaring. It obviously wasn't a silly mistake; nor was it a simple oversight. Nobody really had any comment on itâ??they just took one look and went away shaking their heads in wonder at the enormity of it. It was a "classic smear".'

Lord Justice Taylor's official inquiry into the disaster disparaged The Sun's story and was unequivocal as to the disaster's cause:

'The real cause of the Hillsborough disaster [was] overcrowding, the main reason for the disaster was the failure of police control.'

Following The Sun's report, the newspaper was boycotted by most newsagents in Liverpool, with many refusing to stock the tabloid and large numbers of readers cancelling orders and even refusing to buy from shops which did stock the newspaper.

MacKenzie explained his reporting in 1993. Talking to a House of Commons National Heritage Select Committee he said "I regret Hillsborough. It was a fundamental mistake. The mistake was I believed what an MP said. It was a Tory MP. If he had not said it and the chief superintendent (David Duckenfield) had not agreed with it, we would not have gone with it." This explanation was not accepted by families of Hillsborough victims. Even fifteen years after the Hillsborough disaster, the circulation of The Sun in Liverpool is still believed to be only 12,000 copies a day where previously it was around 200,000.

The Sun itself issued an apology "without reservation" in a full page opinion piece on 7 July 2004, saying that it had "committed the most terrible mistake in its history." The Sun was responding to the intense criticism of Wayne Rooney, a Liverpool-born football star who then still played in the city (for Everton), who had sold his life story to the newspaper. Rooney's actions had incensed Liverpool dwellers still angry at The Sun. The Sun's apology was somewhat bullish, saying that the "campaign of hate" against Rooney was organised in part by the Liverpool Daily Post & Echo, owned by Trinity Mirror, who also own the Daily Mirror, arch-rivals of The Sun. Thus the apology actually served to anger some Liverpudlians further. The Liverpool Echo itself did not accept the apology, calling it "shabby" and "an attempt, once again, to exploit the Hillsborough dead."

In fairness to The Sun, it should be noted that some other newspapers also detailed the same allegations on the same day, which apparently originated from a source within South Yorkshire Police attempting to divert blame, but The Sun attracted particular opprobrium for its use of the huge "THE TRUTH" headline and its subsequent refusal to issue an apology, something the other newspapers were quick to do.
Now I think about it, that's not even funny.

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:29 am
by Vertigo 99
if this was real, how did they get the picture of the guy about to cut them off?

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 12:22 pm
by Grendel
Evolution in action, fine w/ me.

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 12:58 pm
by Unix
So it said he cut is wang? as well, but did he cut it completely off?

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 5:11 pm
by Vertigo 99
tassel = nutsack i believe

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:47 pm
by Richard Cranium
I seem to remember this story from a while ago. Is this just a e-reprint?

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:10 pm
by MD-2389
Unix wrote:So it said he cut is wang? as well, but did he cut it completely off?
Jobless Geoffrey finally collapsed with blood pouring from his groin as horrified drinkers put his testicles in a pint glass of ice. They were handed to paramedics who rushed him to hospital â?? but surgeons could not sew them back.
Skimming is bad for you. ;)

Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 8:35 am
by Unix
Dumbass Rugby Player wrote:I cut my penis as well.
That's what I was talking about. Did he just "cut" his junk or lop that off too?

Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:34 am
by JMEaT
Iceman wrote:I have to call BS on that one ...

Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:17 pm
by Money!
Someone wrote:*Cope's Avatar*

Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:39 pm
by Boo
I wonder if he'd be eligible for a darwin award? He's not going to be reproducing any time soon, and I'd would say that cutting one's balls off counts as 'stupid'.