Page 1 of 1
Hmmm, seems Ace Combat is now safe...
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:05 am
by JMEaT
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:43 am
by Will Robinson
I'm 'annoyed' by some guy using the name Mr. President on the internet, he's all over the place, on news web sites, even on the official white house web site telling people he's going to be hunting them down and brought to justice etc. etc.
I wonder, can I use this law to prosecute this guy who hides behind the alias of \"Mr. President\"?
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 10:11 am
by Krom
Ugh... just Ugh. That is so retarded it boggles the mind. How can they even sign a law in that uses the word 'annoy'? A fly buzzing in your window is 'annoying', kids playing loudly can be 'annoying', its the word for something you don't like but is generally so small that doing anything about it would be more work then just ignoring it.
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 10:29 am
by Iceman
Agreed ... It is so retarded that it screams for a good checking into the validity of that article and the stated consequences of the law. Could it be that the article is bullchit?
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 10:32 am
by JMEaT
Iceman wrote:Agreed ... It is so retarded that it screams for a good checking into the validity of that article and the stated consequences of the law. Could it be that the article is bullchit?
I hope so...
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 11:32 am
by Sting_Ray
Sigh, fine... ya'all be bïtches.
Sincerely,
Joe.
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 11:50 am
by DCrazy
Caught it on Fark the other day, seems real.
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 11:54 am
by Vertigo 99
yeah its popping up all over the place, if its a hoax its masterfully done
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:04 pm
by Dedman
This entire thread anoys me therefore someone must be imprisoned
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:53 pm
by fyrephlie
HEY... maybe we can get some of these viral video people sent off to jail for being annoying!
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:37 pm
by Iceman
Dedman wrote:This entire thread anoys me therefore someone must be imprisoned
LOL!
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:39 pm
by MD-2389
I find Lothar's mile long posts annoying as hell! You're going to jail now buddy!
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:54 pm
by AceCombat
HAHAH!! very funny J\"Whore\"
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 4:11 pm
by dissent
This is teh funniest thread in a while.
x2. LOL @ dedman.
Heh. Let's all go to the big house. What's not to like - three squares, library within walkin distance (heck
everything is within walking distance
), stuctured exercise program, plenty of law enforcement around to maintain order
, etc., etc. ...
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 4:48 pm
by *Javed*
Heh.
My name IS Javed, but it doesn't have the stars. I guess I can't 'annoy' people on the DBB
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 4:52 pm
by MD-2389
dissent wrote:This is teh funniest thread in a while.
x2. LOL @ dedman.
Heh. Let's all go to the big house. What's not to like - three squares, library within walkin distance (heck
everything is within walking distance
), stuctured exercise program, plenty of law enforcement around to maintain order
, etc., etc. ...
And free cable TV for all you freeloaders!
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:37 pm
by Lothar
MD-2389 wrote:I find Lothar's mile long posts annoying as hell!
The law was about
intent to annoy, not actual annoyance. You can only have me busted if I'm doing it for the purpose of annoying you. In other words, in order to apply this law, you have to infer that a comment was designed, by an intelligence, to annoy someone.
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:05 pm
by MD-2389
Lothar wrote:MD-2389 wrote:I find Lothar's mile long posts annoying as hell!
The law was about
intent to annoy, not actual annoyance. You can only have me busted if I'm doing it for the purpose of annoying you. In other words, in order to apply this law, you have to infer that a comment was designed, by an intelligence, to annoy someone.
Psst! It was a joke.
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:23 pm
by Lothar
MD-2389 wrote:Lothar wrote:MD-2389 wrote:I find Lothar's mile long posts annoying as hell!
The law was about
intent to annoy, not actual annoyance. You can only have me busted if I'm doing it for the purpose of annoying you. In other words, in order to apply this law, you have to infer that a comment was designed, by an intelligence, to annoy someone.
Psst! It was a joke. ;)
ecks two.
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:28 pm
by woodchip
Re:
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:12 am
by roid
Lothar wrote:MD-2389 wrote:I find Lothar's mile long posts annoying as hell!
The law was about
intent to annoy, not actual annoyance. You can only have me busted if I'm doing it for the purpose of annoying you. In other words, in order to apply this law, you have to infer that a comment was designed, by an intelligence, to annoy someone.
but can you prove it to a jury?
Re:
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:13 am
by JMEaT
AceCombat wrote:HAHAH!! very funny J"Whore"
I'll see you in court, sir.
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 12:48 pm
by VR7
When I read the topic, I thought you guys were talking about the PS2 game franchise, not the person.
You know, Jack Thompson learned about this law too, and intends on using it to \"shield\" himself. For example, if someone tried to e-mail him politely about
anything, that guy would be, in Jack Thompson's world, a fucked man.
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:52 pm
by Admiral Thrawn
Hell, if our government is going to go that far, they might as well include those annoying screaming kids on xbox live too. I'd be more than happy to sue a few parents.
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:21 pm
by Behemoth
good use of our tax dollars
