Just saying hi. It's been a while since I swung by.
Been playing League of Legends lately... the level to which you can get cerebral, long learning curve, PvP aspects remind me some of descent... though obviously not with the 6DOF part.
Search found 3193 matches
- Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:12 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: "Google manifesto"
- Replies: 42
- Views: 7898
Re: "Google manifesto"
See what you think of this article about sex bias in STEM fields snoopy. https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~srugheimer/Women_in_STEM_Resources.html Yeah - I see it all the time at work (I work in STEM) - in subtle ways. My bottom line when I'm hiring (again, for STEM positions) - I want to find people ...
- Sun Aug 13, 2017 1:21 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: "Google manifesto"
- Replies: 42
- Views: 7898
Re: "Google manifesto"
"Projection" nothing, this is the very definition of dog-whistle politics. Or to use a popular meme, "I'm not saying it's aliens...but aliens." Stated or not, you don't write something like that without having one specific purpose in mind. As far as authority goes, I'd challenge you to find a ...
- Sun Aug 13, 2017 11:52 am
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: "Google manifesto"
- Replies: 42
- Views: 7898
Re: "Google manifesto"
Thanks for making some of my points. The rebuttal linked opens by claiming that the statements are incorrect, but that the [rebuttal's] author is not an authority in the field, so he'll leave it to others to prove their incorrectness. Turns out, the author [of the Google manifesto] is a biologist ...
- Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:13 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: "Google manifesto"
- Replies: 42
- Views: 7898
"Google manifesto"
I don't know how many of you guys have been following the "Google manifesto" thing. It's fascinating me. For those who aren't following it: A Google employee submits a document internally within Google which addresses the subject of diversity, bias, and monoculture. (specifically within Google ...
- Sat Jul 29, 2017 6:32 am
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Righteous Arrogance
- Replies: 57
- Views: 6600
Re: Righteous Arrogance
I see a lot of assertions... no arguments. I notice that you conveniently neglected to assert that Jesus' existence was also fantasy... do you care to attempt that assertion? Because it's included in the previous statement. No adam and eve = no jesus (and so on and so forth. 'it follows'). Trying ...
- Sun Jun 11, 2017 11:31 am
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Michigan Anti Muslim
- Replies: 21
- Views: 3145
Re: Michigan Anti Muslim
You do understand the difference (In terms of lasting effects) between the two, correct?Ferno wrote:Guess they'd better pass a law banning circumcision.
- Thu Apr 27, 2017 6:30 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: "scienciness?"
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1943
Re: "scienciness?"
To use a local phrase, I think that most of them trust the process: they understand that science is the best framework of tools humanity has to gain knowledge of the universe we live in, and that these tools allow us, through all of the messy dead ends and false leads and missteps, to keep ...
- Tue Apr 25, 2017 7:43 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Would you sacrifice your son if God told you to?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3584
Re: Would you sacrifice your son if God told you to?
given that hearing voices(auditory hallucination) is sort of a core symptom of several severe mental illnesses(a knowledge base not available to the ancients), I'd be far too leery if still in control of my faculties. Consider the history between God and Abraham to this point: Abraham has heard ...
- Tue Apr 25, 2017 7:25 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Happy Easter
- Replies: 25
- Views: 5384
Re: Happy Easter
Indoctrinating children can never be a good thing. I love how people talk about zombies, spaghetti monsters and “fairy tales” but then get all gushy when something fits a certain narrative. Exactly. What leftist atheists don't get is that they're on the menu after Christians and Jews are taken out b ...
- Tue Apr 25, 2017 7:17 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Bwahahahaha! Google's 'rainbow doodle'
- Replies: 38
- Views: 3513
Re: Bwahahahaha! Google's 'rainbow doodle'
This reminds me slightly of the "coexist" bumper stickers that irk me. I don't have an issue with the idea of getting along with those around me, including those that hold different beliefs. I do have an issue with any overtones that I should validate other beliefs with which I disagree. How about ...
- Tue Apr 25, 2017 7:06 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: "scienciness?"
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1943
"scienciness?"
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2017/04/the_march_for_science_was_eerily_religious.html Interesting article. As an engineer, I feel like I hit this type of thing a lot: people who make scientific-sounding statements or arguments which are really quite undeveloped or quite ...
- Fri Apr 21, 2017 9:41 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Bwahahahaha! Google's 'rainbow doodle'
- Replies: 38
- Views: 3513
Re: Bwahahahaha! Google's 'rainbow doodle'
This reminds me slightly of the "coexist" bumper stickers that irk me. I don't have an issue with the idea of getting along with those around me, including those that hold different beliefs. I do have an issue with any overtones that I should validate other beliefs with which I disagree. What irks ...
- Fri Apr 21, 2017 9:13 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Happy Easter
- Replies: 25
- Views: 5384
Re: Happy Easter
I lurk every once in a while...
So, how does he get it? Does he get it because he's helping kids, or because he's being "religiously inclusive?"
So, how does he get it? Does he get it because he's helping kids, or because he's being "religiously inclusive?"
- Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:04 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Righteous Arrogance
- Replies: 57
- Views: 6600
Re: Righteous Arrogance
You're kidding snoopy. you're seriously going to pull an argument from authority with the bible? It is essentially rumor, heresy and outright fantasy. There is no anthropological, historical, seismic, geologic or paleontological evidence supporting anything in the bible. Zero evidence of any kind ...
- Thu Feb 02, 2017 9:08 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: [Split] Topics and Moderating
- Replies: 74
- Views: 9892
Re: Righteous Arrogance
like I say, I'd like to know how, seeing as how religion is a major source of ethics, and politics is just philosophy put to action. ...and religion is a pretty large branch of philosophy... The discussion / commentary used to be more lengthy, more introspective, and more logically responsible ...
- Thu Feb 02, 2017 9:00 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Righteous Arrogance
- Replies: 57
- Views: 6600
Re: Righteous Arrogance
1. I wouldn't exactly bank on what Sam Harris has to say about religion in general... his level of scholarship on the matter isn't exactly high quality I would expect that assessment of an atheist by a theist that actually believes in the words written in those multiple thousand year old tomes of ...
- Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:45 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Righteous Arrogance
- Replies: 57
- Views: 6600
Re: Righteous Arrogance
1. I wouldn't exactly bank on what Sam Harris has to say about religion in general... his level of scholarship on the matter isn't exactly high quality. 2. All of the blind hate for Christianity that I see displayed is nothing more than that - blind hate. If you want to present a credible case for ...
- Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:40 am
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Human sexuality class...
- Replies: 34
- Views: 2548
Re: Human sexuality class...
what a steaming pile of BS, especially your assumptions. Continue fighting the war AGAINST education, your puppetmasters approve. I don't know about the assumptions... but I do agree that a human sexuality teacher sitting up there and opining on the election in such terms is a load of BS. That isn ...
- Fri Dec 02, 2016 6:57 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Random Evolution?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1318
Re: Random Evolution?
So are you saying that you think there's a gene sequence that dictates/creates a "rapid mutation" capability in cells? I can see that being plausible.
- Fri Dec 02, 2016 2:57 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Random Evolution?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1318
Random Evolution?
Stumbled on this today: link (feel free to look for your own sources if you wish to question the source's bias: maybe thing like this ) Research seems to be indicating that genetic mutation isn't merely a random event - but that cells display a feedback loop of sorts which control genetic mutation ...
- Fri Nov 25, 2016 7:46 am
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Backlash
- Replies: 20
- Views: 3538
Re: Backlash
So now people without college are considered “uneducated”. In the 21st century? Absolutely. Or at the very least they're uneducated in the complex realms that define modern international politics, or global economic systems, or proper applications of scientific discoveries, or any number of other fi ...
- Thu Nov 24, 2016 9:39 am
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Now that the shoe is on the other foot...
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1093
Re: Now that the shoe is on the other foot...
Being intolerant of intolerance is not itself intolerance. Not only that, but there is a massive and fundamental difference between opposing a person's political stances and policies, and opposing who they are fundamentally as a person. Thanks for the good example of the SJW's flawed logic. Being ...
- Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:32 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Now that the shoe is on the other foot...
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1093
- Fri Nov 18, 2016 9:03 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: I admire Americans
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1065
Re: I admire Americans
Don't too much... they're all banned thanks to their bets. In a few weeks it'll be back to business as normal.
- Thu Nov 10, 2016 4:18 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Dow Jones
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1048
Re: Dow Jones
My comment on the other thread applies both ways: Right now whatever the Dow is doing pretty well embodies a self-fulfilling prophecy, considering that Trump has another couple months before he can make any presidential impact on the economy. The investor types might do well to wait and see what he ...
- Wed Nov 09, 2016 11:23 am
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: guess the 2016 election game
- Replies: 75
- Views: 7291
Re: guess the 2016 election game
★■◆● graciousness. Half of the people in this country voted for a racist, misogynist, anti-intellectual, small-minded, petty, temperamental, general piece of human excrement. For ★■◆●'s sake, this is a man who COULD NOT BE ★■◆●ing TRUSTED TO RUN A TWITTER ACCOUNT. A grown man. And yet he is someone ...
- Tue Nov 08, 2016 5:17 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: I voted, did you?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1114
- Fri Nov 04, 2016 7:51 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Gun Bans work
- Replies: 27
- Views: 3697
Re: Gun Bans work
I believe you know a thing or two about the field, so I'll take your word for it.
- Fri Nov 04, 2016 11:47 am
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Kids in Minnesota pick...
- Replies: 15
- Views: 1654
Re: Kids in Minnesota pick...
The kids could also have just been trolling. When it ultimately means nothing, I'm more willing to do something "just for the lols."Jeff250 wrote:Conservatives have more children than liberals.
- Fri Nov 04, 2016 11:45 am
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Gun Bans work
- Replies: 27
- Views: 3697
Re: Gun Bans work
so, Woody, explain Oxycontin, Hydrocodone, Fentamyl, etc, etc. I'm guessing that's directed at me? Those are all supposedly controlled substances, right? I think it's supposed to go something like this: low mental alteration/low addictive qualities = over the counter; mid mental alteration/mid ...
- Fri Nov 04, 2016 6:19 am
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Gun Bans work
- Replies: 27
- Views: 3697
Re: Gun Bans work
Well, http://seanduffy.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55168107b883300e55314cb6f8833-pi :twisted2: See that's what i'm talking about. Back in the day, that was called medicine. Now, it's called a drug. Yes... in heroin's case it's a story of utter failure: they tried to come up with a drug that didn't cause as ...
- Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:10 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Pardoner-in-Chief
- Replies: 32
- Views: 2967
Re: Pardoner-in-Chief
There are plenty of things that "people will always like" for which I doubt that you'd apply a similar argument. The bottom line: drug use isn't victim less and it's illegal. If you choose to do it (regardless of whether you think it should or shouldn't be illegal), you participate in and enable ...
- Sat Oct 29, 2016 12:42 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Pardoner-in-Chief
- Replies: 32
- Views: 2967
Re: Pardoner-in-Chief
What about all of the DEAD PEOPLE in Mexico/South America and the Caribbean from drug cartel violence? I think it's cute that you're blaming drug users as if it was their decision to criminalize the drug trade. Here's a protip: People like to get high. Always have, always will. When you criminalize ...
- Wed Oct 19, 2016 1:49 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Sorry Rush...
- Replies: 44
- Views: 5285
Re: Sorry Rush...
au contraire, I understand it more than you do, apparently. If you wish to make a case for your take, you're welcome to make it on PM. And speaking of misunderstanding, I noticed you slipped in Atheism in with slavers, nazis and supremacists. That's extremely dismissive and pretentious... another ...
- Sun Oct 16, 2016 6:39 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Sorry Rush...
- Replies: 44
- Views: 5285
Re: Sorry Rush...
If you depend on your theology to be a guide for your morality, you have a real problem. because here you're saying "I do good things because I'm scared I'll be punished" instead of saying "I do good things because I value other people". Clearly you misunderstand what the Bible has to teach.
- Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:07 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Sorry Rush...
- Replies: 44
- Views: 5285
Re: Sorry Rush...
Vision hits the nail on the head, at least with snoopy's position. Theology is not morality. Note that you changed what vision said. My theology is absolutely the source of my morality. For all people, their philosophy (of which theology is a portion) is their source of morality. Vision begs the ...
- Sat Oct 15, 2016 7:26 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Sorry Rush...
- Replies: 44
- Views: 5285
Re: Sorry Rush...
Nobody's perfect. I think snoopy chose the wrong word: "respect" isn't what he was talking about. I wouldn't suggest infringing on Rush's human rights, but I have no respect for his character or actions. He is a terrible person who uses his position to harm others both directly and indirectly ...
- Sat Oct 15, 2016 7:11 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Sorry Rush...
- Replies: 44
- Views: 5285
Re: Sorry Rush...
You, also, are dehumanizing people and you've done a fine job of putting yourself at the level of which you accuse them. Then explain why a lot of them talk and act the same way. it starts with accepting everyone as a valuable human being so you can move on to having quality rational conversations ...
- Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:04 pm
- Forum: Ethics and Commentary
- Topic: Sorry Rush...
- Replies: 44
- Views: 5285
Re: Sorry Rush...
If Rush Limbaugh's caustic mouth is OK for a human being to spout all over the airwaves as insipid trash and hateful rhetoric, then I must be from another planet. Maybe it's time to go back to that planet because everything he spouts is an anathema to every decent human being in this country and ...