No, Seriously .......

Duper · Post by **Duper** » Sat Mar 26, 2005 2:17 am

For all you Serious Sam fans out there, it would seem that there is a Serious Sam II on it's way.

Check it out HERE and HERE
They were giving regular updates on it and thier publisher put a lid on it just before last Christmas. It should be good, thier engine is great.

[]V[]essenjah · Post by **[]V[]essenjah** » Sat Mar 26, 2005 6:59 pm

I thought Serious Sam 2 came out a LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG ELONGATED time ago? And I played it. Unless we are speaking of the Third Encounter here?

edited for laziness to use the post preview function - MD

Tetrad · Post by **Tetrad** » Sat Mar 26, 2005 7:30 pm

Serious Sam: The Second Encounter != Serious Sam II

Duper · Post by **Duper** » Sat Mar 26, 2005 9:32 pm

check the link.

the second encounter isn't the serious sam 2. It will be at E-3 this year. At the second link, there is a couple of downloads of some demos of the new engine. They are rather impressive.

The second encounter was made on the original engine.

JMEaT · Post by **JMEaT** » Sun Mar 27, 2005 9:46 am

I should prolly upgrade my PC one of these days so I can play some of the newer games. >_>

roid · Post by **roid** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 4:51 am

you'r not missing anything with serious sam JMEAT. it sucked (but kyle of hardocp loved it, so EVERYBODY JUMP ON TEH TRAIN!!! arses) .

JMEaT · Post by **JMEaT** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:38 am

Haha, I thought the graphics were good in the 1st one but I only played the demo.

Tetrad · Post by **Tetrad** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:56 pm

roid wrote:it sucked

Simple, yes. Sucky, no. It was a blast to play, especially co-op. It was also sold for like $20 here so they knew it was a "budget" title from the beginning.

fliptw · Post by **fliptw** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:57 pm

Tetrad wrote:
roid wrote:it sucked
Simple, yes. Sucky, no. It was a blast to play, especially co-op.

co-op was the bomb. doom3 should've had something like that.

[]V[]essenjah · Post by **[]V[]essenjah** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 3:49 pm

Yup, I never laughed so hard in my life while playing that game. It was worth every penny due to the ammount of laughing noises I made while playing it.

Duper · Post by **Duper** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:15 pm

I liked it. I got hooked in a coop game at a Lan. We um.. shared.. a copy and spent several hours blowing stuff up.

I agree with Mess.. Luaghed so hard at times in that game I could barely play. the game has some great easter eggs too.

It's what Duke Nukem has always wanted to be. And infact I think this is the point they have made.

roid · Post by **roid** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:35 am

hmm yeah it was quite dukey wasn't it. nvr thought of that before.

it came in a game bundle that was bundled with a VR glove i got. my brother was bored one day so i figured we'd load it up and give it a go.
i think i played 1.5 levels into it. it had a duke nukem kinda humour to it i spose, but i just wasn't in the mood (for FPS).

DCrazy · Post by **DCrazy** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:48 pm

I always saw it as a mix between DN3D's humor and Doom II's sheer number of monsters.