Lets all spit

woodchip · Post by **woodchip** » Thu Aug 25, 2005 6:48 am

Well if the following is true then I guess shades of Vietnam is darkening America's sky's once again:

From the Drudge Report
"ANTI-WAR PROTESTERS TARGET WOUNDED AT ARMY HOSPITAL
Wed Aug 2005 24 21:20:05 ET

Anti-war protestors besieged wounded and disabled soldiers at Walter Reed Hospital in Washington, D.C, a new web report will claim!

CNSNews.com is planning to run an expose on Thursday featuring interviews with both protestors and veterans, as well as shots of protest signs with slogans like â??Maimed for a Lie.â?

Birdseye · Post by **Birdseye** » Thu Aug 25, 2005 10:58 am

These people are misguided and counter productive to their own cause

let me reiterate that you can be anti war, but support the troops.

will_kill · Post by **will_kill** » Thu Aug 25, 2005 11:39 am

Birdseye wrote:.....you can be anti war, but support the troops.

hear hear...our troops are our most precious asset outside the realm of family.

Grendel · Post by **Grendel** » Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:11 pm

will_kill wrote:
Birdseye wrote:.....you can be anti war, but support the troops.
hear hear...our troops are our most precious asset outside the realm of family.

...

Palzon · Post by **Palzon** » Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:28 pm

Birdseye wrote:These people are misguided and counter productive to their own cause

let me reiterate that you can be anti war, but support the troops.

I'm sorry, but when i read this i chuckled because it reminded me of something Bill Hicks once said:

Bill Hicks wrote:I'm in the unenviable position of being for the war, but against the troops.

will_kill · Post by **will_kill** » Thu Aug 25, 2005 4:28 pm

Grendel wrote:
will_kill wrote:
Birdseye wrote:.....you can be anti war, but support the troops.
hear hear...our troops are our most precious asset outside the realm of family.
...

pm maybe?

Genghis · Post by **Genghis** » Thu Aug 25, 2005 6:33 pm

Birdseye wrote:let me reiterate that you can be anti war, but support the troops.

Acutally, I am in the unenviable position of being for the war but against the troops.

Krom · Post by **Krom** » Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:22 pm

I don't care if you support the war or not, just don't be stupid about it.

Duper · Post by **Duper** » Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:42 pm

they're showing the goofballs outside Pres Bush's house.

whoopdydoo. nothing to see here folks. eveyone go home.

Ferno · Post by **Ferno** » Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:04 am

The Iraq war. Brought to you by our proud sponsors: lies and deception.

woodchip · Post by **woodchip** » Fri Aug 26, 2005 5:28 am

Ferno wrote:The Iraq war. Brought to you by our proud sponsors: lies and deception.

Initiated and confirmed as true by Clinton appointee George Tenent (ex head of CIA)

roid · Post by **roid** » Fri Aug 26, 2005 7:52 am

woodchip wrote:
Ferno wrote:The Iraq war. Brought to you by our proud sponsors: lies and deception.
Initiated and confirmed as true by Clinton appointee George Tenent (ex head of CIA)

ex head of CIA GEORGE BUSH has nothing to do with anything... no sir, no way.

hey lets go ride our bikes! weeeee

â??Maimed for a Lie.â?

Ferno · Post by **Ferno** » Fri Aug 26, 2005 10:45 am

yea.. it's always the democrat's fault, huh.

Birdseye · Post by **Birdseye** » Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:24 pm

and its never George Sr.'s fault for not finishing what he started

Vander · Post by **Vander** » Fri Aug 26, 2005 1:28 pm

"Initiated and confirmed as true by Clinton appointee George Tenent"

Who was then given the Medal of Freedom by Bush for his valued service!

woodchip · Post by **woodchip** » Sat Aug 27, 2005 6:25 am

Vander wrote:"Initiated and confirmed as true by Clinton appointee George Tenent"

Who was then given the Medal of Freedom by Bush for his valued service!

Yeah, I wonder if Bush would like to take the medal back.

MD-2389 · Post by **MD-2389** » Sat Aug 27, 2005 2:32 pm

Krom wrote:I don't care if you support the war or not, just don't be stupid about it.

x2

Will Robinson · Post by **Will Robinson** » Sat Aug 27, 2005 3:36 pm

Birdseye wrote:and its never George Sr.'s fault for not finishing what he started

Yes, actually it is. In retrospect that's the biggest missed opportunity I can remmeber. Bigger than Clintons recent "If I had only known, I'd have got bin Ladden...'
But I'm not sure america would have had the stomach for what we would have suffered without a 9/11 to prop up their collective resolve. We'd probably just now be leaving there and the losses would have been enormous relative to what we've suffered so far.