A1 vs. F1
- Mobius
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 7940
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
- Contact:
A1 vs. F1
Anyone watching the new GP series? Sadly, last night our #$%^@#ing rival TV channels chose to show the start of the 18 lapper A1 opener 20 laps before the end of the Suzuka F1 GP. (Delayed F1 coverage = no live timing from F1.com - GRRR!)
It meant there was only about 3 minutes difference between the races ending. I wonder if they did that shiz on purpose?
Anyway, the Suzuka race was awesome! Probably one of the greatest Formula 1s in modern history. Raikonen was outstanding; starting from 17th on the grid, and winning on the final lap.
The A1 GP. while very different to F1 seems to be almost as exciting: I haven't had a Kiwi car/driver to root for since - well - ever! With all the cars the same, it's looking like being a great series. Of course, it doesn't hurt that NZ is lying 2nd equal after 4 races.
A huge weekend of Motorsport it was: The Bathurst 1000 race of the V8 supercars was also on. A Kiwi won that too...
What's your take on A1 vs. F1?
It meant there was only about 3 minutes difference between the races ending. I wonder if they did that shiz on purpose?
Anyway, the Suzuka race was awesome! Probably one of the greatest Formula 1s in modern history. Raikonen was outstanding; starting from 17th on the grid, and winning on the final lap.
The A1 GP. while very different to F1 seems to be almost as exciting: I haven't had a Kiwi car/driver to root for since - well - ever! With all the cars the same, it's looking like being a great series. Of course, it doesn't hurt that NZ is lying 2nd equal after 4 races.
A huge weekend of Motorsport it was: The Bathurst 1000 race of the V8 supercars was also on. A Kiwi won that too...
What's your take on A1 vs. F1?
- Vindicator
- DBB Benefactor
- Posts: 3166
- Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: southern IL, USA
- Contact:
The F1 race last night was fantastic. It was a lot of fun watching the faster teams start at the back and work their way up. Lots of ballsy passes. Kinda amazing how quickly the Renault and McLaren cars pulled away from Schumacher once they got around him.
I was rooting for Fisichella but Kimi was simply too fast for him. At least he didnt stall his car this time around...
I was rooting for Fisichella but Kimi was simply too fast for him. At least he didnt stall his car this time around...
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9782
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9782
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9782
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
Um, my avatar is from FIA GTR Racing. It's closed wheel racing aka Vettes, Ferraris, Porshces, BMW, Lambos, Vipers, etc.
http://www.10tacle.com/gtr-game/en/index.php?Homepage
I like those types as well as open wheel. What I was talking about was NASCAR. I was joking also so don't get all miffed about it.
http://www.10tacle.com/gtr-game/en/index.php?Homepage
I like those types as well as open wheel. What I was talking about was NASCAR. I was joking also so don't get all miffed about it.
I'm just having some fun too. I know what you meant. I actually do enjoy open wheel racing. Just not F1. Too much of the action is off the track. I enjoy either IRL or Champ when they are on the road courses. I prefer sports car racing though. NASCAR has it's moments.CDN_Merlin wrote:Um, my avatar is from FIA GTR Racing. It's closed wheel racing aka Vettes, Ferraris, Porshces, BMW, Lambos, Vipers, etc.
http://www.10tacle.com/gtr-game/en/index.php?Homepage
I like those types as well as open wheel. What I was talking about was NASCAR. I was joking also so don't get all miffed about it.
If I had to pick only type to watch though it would be bicylce racing. To me, the skill, drama, and team tactics are second to none.
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9782
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
★■◆● that. i'm skipping the ground all together and waiting for races in the sky
btw, did anyone else see that loose wheel hit that car at Bathurst? that was so cool. the guy keeps driving with a half caved in windscreen.
btw, did anyone else see that loose wheel hit that car at Bathurst? that was so cool. the guy keeps driving with a half caved in windscreen.
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9782
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
-
- DBB Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 2367
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Israel
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9782
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
Oh man would that of rocked. No car today would get me stiff (other than a Porsche GT2) than they old style muscle cars.woodchip wrote:Thats probably because you never got to drive a 1964 pontiac GTO...when you were in high school.Flabby Chick wrote:Cars bore the poo out of me. (unless they're being reviewed by Jeremy Clarkson)
-
- DBB Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 2367
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Israel
See, that's my beef with F1. I realize they are the most techologically advanced cars, best drivers, coolest tracks, etc. The problem is, to me, it looks like an 180mph parade. Because so much of the action is off track with the politics and manuvering of the teams, if you don't follow it, it's boring.Mobius wrote:Dedman wrote:I've seen more passing this year than I've seen in the previous 4 seasons combined.
Now if there was more action on the track I would propably start watching. I know NASCAR gets a bad rap. Some of it may be deserved. But, there is a lot of action on the track. Even the Champ car series has more on track action than F1.
I don't watch racing to see cars go fast. If that was my motivation I would watch drag racing. I don't watch drag racing presicely because it is boring. I want to see a lot of action between cars.
- Mobius
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 7940
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
- Contact:
Yes, you are right of course. I firmly believe Mark Blundell when he says that F1 cars generate too much aerodynamic downforce - so much, that it frequently prevents overtaking maneuvers at top speed because of the dire effects on the downforce of the following vehicle.
I'd be happy to see F1 cars with dramatically reduced rear-wings, and with the "Turbo Boost" button used by the A1 cars and the Champ Cars.
I still think teams should be allowed to change tyres during a race.
One of the issues with F1 right now is the tracks. I despise the crappy Monaco circuit. It's a joke and shouldn't be on the F1 calendar IMO. Narrow circuits are the death of F1 "racing", where the only time it's possible to overtake is in the pits! HEY! THAT'S NOT PROPER RACING AT ALL!
It remains the ultimate in car racing however, and it'll continue to have ups and downs.
It never ceases to amaze me that no matter what the FIA does to slow the cars down, the teams manage, by the end of the season, to break lap records AGAIN. How do they do that?
I'd be happy to see F1 cars with dramatically reduced rear-wings, and with the "Turbo Boost" button used by the A1 cars and the Champ Cars.
I still think teams should be allowed to change tyres during a race.
One of the issues with F1 right now is the tracks. I despise the crappy Monaco circuit. It's a joke and shouldn't be on the F1 calendar IMO. Narrow circuits are the death of F1 "racing", where the only time it's possible to overtake is in the pits! HEY! THAT'S NOT PROPER RACING AT ALL!
It remains the ultimate in car racing however, and it'll continue to have ups and downs.
It never ceases to amaze me that no matter what the FIA does to slow the cars down, the teams manage, by the end of the season, to break lap records AGAIN. How do they do that?
- Flatlander
- DBB Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 1999 2:01 am
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
- Mobius
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 7940
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
- Contact:
ACK. Manual? That'd be silly. No new cars will be manual in ten years. Tiptronic and computerised preselecting is the way of the future. As to grooved tyres, I like them, they're closer to road tyres (if a tyre of those dimensions can ever be compared to a road tyre!), and allow the audience to see how the tyres are wearing.
I think more ground effects are called for. The first generation of cars went silly with it, and it was banned, but it's a legitimate method of increasing downforce, and many new cars use it to good effect. It makes cars more efficient too. So I think it'd be a great idea to remove some wing area, and add a small amount of ground effect to offset the loss.
2006 season is a big engine change, to V8s, and this will drop the maximum revs from a positively insane 19,500 to something a bit more reasonable. (Like 14,000? )
I'm really looking forward to it.
I think more ground effects are called for. The first generation of cars went silly with it, and it was banned, but it's a legitimate method of increasing downforce, and many new cars use it to good effect. It makes cars more efficient too. So I think it'd be a great idea to remove some wing area, and add a small amount of ground effect to offset the loss.
2006 season is a big engine change, to V8s, and this will drop the maximum revs from a positively insane 19,500 to something a bit more reasonable. (Like 14,000? )
I'm really looking forward to it.