Image Uploader ...

KoolBear · Post by **KoolBear** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 7:31 pm

I added a MOD tonight that will allow you to upload images to postimage.org.

Ther eis a 2 meg limit, it will automatically create a thumbnail and add the link to your post.

The thumbnail is linked to the full size image. See my test of the MOD here.
phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=8814

The link above should look something like this ...

KB

Duper · Post by **Duper** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 8:33 pm

To USE this cool new mod....

KoolBear · Post by **KoolBear** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 8:59 pm

yea what duper said!

Krom · Post by **Krom** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 9:13 pm

I did notice that, but I'll stick to my own web space for now, this server doesn't look like it needs any extra work.

KoolBear · Post by **KoolBear** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 10:19 pm

That's always prefered but I know many users either don't have a website or maybe the means to post a picture

KB

DCrazy · Post by **DCrazy** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 10:58 pm

Thank you KB! Something many hostless posters have been clamoring for.

KoolBear · Post by **KoolBear** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:17 pm

I aim to please, I fall short most of the time but my desire is an honest one.

Couver_ · Post by **Couver_** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 8:52 pm

Instead of an image hoster can we have avitars that are 90x90? Opens up so much more fun stuff

DCrazy · Post by **DCrazy** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 9:37 pm

I think, given Couver's post, we need [sarcasm] tags.

Krom · Post by **Krom** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:31 pm

I have a 145x200 avatar in another forum, it's nice in a quiet forum but not on the DBB, even sigs are disabled here, much as I hate 64x64 I think we should stick with it.

fyrephlie · Post by **fyrephlie** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 2:56 am

what we don't need is giant avatars and banner signatures!!!

i used to be guilty of this. my own animated avatar is a bit distracting, but i really don't want to have to turn off images just to browse this forum...

woodchip · Post by **woodchip** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:59 pm

Sigs, we need sigs...

fyrephlie · Post by **fyrephlie** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 2:14 pm

MY SIG:

MD-2389 · Post by **MD-2389** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 12:07 am

I see no problem with avatars as large as 100x100, since the current layout easily allows for it (fits upto 120 pixels before breaking format). Even with the current filesize limit (which is a tad bit much IMO. People need to learn how to compress images better.) it easily allows for it. As for sigs, bring them back. If you don't want to see them, just go into your profile (once KB gets things set up) and turn them off.

jakee308 · Post by **jakee308** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 4:48 am

i've always thought that signatures were a text line at the bottom of the post. not an image.

Aus-RED-5 · Post by **Aus-RED-5** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:06 am

fyrephlie wrote:MY SIG:

heh... nahhh.. It should be Diedel's. That him using Lunix!

roid · Post by **roid** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 7:35 am

jakee308 wrote:i've always thought that signatures were a text line at the bottom of the post. not an image.

some forums allow images in sigs, so in those forums ppl often JUST use an image as their sig although they can use text as well.

fyrephlie · Post by **fyrephlie** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:12 am

roid wrote:
jakee308 wrote:i've always thought that signatures were a text line at the bottom of the post. not an image.
some forums allow images in sigs, so in those forums ppl often JUST use an image as their sig although they can use text as well.

and it is usually some poorly constructed banner image that says something like... XXX CLAN RoXXoRZ j0R BoXXorZ!!!

roid · Post by **roid** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:22 am

yeah and tests you for epilepsy

Diedel · Post by **Diedel** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:28 am

Aus-RED-5 wrote:
fyrephlie wrote:MY SIG:

heh... nahhh.. It should be Diedel's. That him using Lunix!

I HAVE READ THAT, AUS!

Behemoth · Post by **Behemoth** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:50 am

KoolBear is the Koolest!

jakee308 · Post by **jakee308** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 11:10 am

Aus-RED-5 wrote: heh... nahhh.. It should be Diedel's. That him using Lunix!

"Lunix" hah! perfect! i'll be using that meself thank you very much Aus-RED-5.

fyrephlie · Post by **fyrephlie** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:12 pm

i first found that looking for something to post in response to mobi... that's his grammar nazi act

jakee308 · Post by **jakee308** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 7:10 pm

if i watch that "lunix" avatar too long, i start to get ill!
very good job fyrephlie! it takes a bit to make me queasy. there's just enough detail in that thing to do it for me. (love those flying eyeballs) yyeecchh! (i have experienced that sort of rage. not just over lunix either.)

Aus-RED-5 · Post by **Aus-RED-5** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 3:00 am

Diedel wrote:
Aus-RED-5 wrote:
fyrephlie wrote:MY SIG:

heh... nahhh.. It should be Diedel's. That him using Lunix!
I HAVE READ THAT, AUS!