Installing rpms with OpenSUSE?
Installing rpms with OpenSUSE?
How do I install rpms with openSUSE 10?
When i double click them after download, i am offered to install them with YaST or use them as source with YaST. If I click \"install\", YaST opens, but doesn't offer me the package. If I chose \"source\", nothing happens either.
Hmmm ... Linux ...
When i double click them after download, i am offered to install them with YaST or use them as source with YaST. If I click \"install\", YaST opens, but doesn't offer me the package. If I chose \"source\", nothing happens either.
Hmmm ... Linux ...
http://susefaq.sourceforge.net/howto/rpm.html
rpm, tho its part of the LSD, is easily the least capable of the package systems availible.
rpm, tho its part of the LSD, is easily the least capable of the package systems availible.
The Linux kernel knows jack about filenames and/or extensions.
Actually I think your comment highlights the exact problem with *nix: nothing is coherent, and while Windows and MacOS are content to present things as such, *nuxen are adamant about maintaining any distinctions on the programming side right up through to the user interface, in the name of \"factual accuracy\".
Actually I think your comment highlights the exact problem with *nix: nothing is coherent, and while Windows and MacOS are content to present things as such, *nuxen are adamant about maintaining any distinctions on the programming side right up through to the user interface, in the name of \"factual accuracy\".
Re:
thats true of all operating systems, I think he refereing to what desktop shell he's using.DCrazy wrote:The Linux kernel knows jack about filenames and/or extensions.
I am using Gnome, and I think I know jack about Linux.
I tried to install SDL_mixer using the rpm too, and there never appeared a libSDL_mixer.a in /usr/lib.
Something doesn't seem to work here.
Installing something on Linux is such a PITA. I just wanted to get a GUI debugger frontend (DDD), and it says \"oh you need this package, and to run it, you need that package, which will in turn require the other package\".
If at all, I had to install one additional software to make something run on MS Windows, and usually everything comes packed together. Unless it is some Linux software someone has ported to Windows, that is. Heh.
Not that I would want to rant about Linux (again), but I still have neither a working KDevelop nor a GUI debugger frontend, after trying to get this to install for hours. On Windows, the time such a thing would take would have to be measured in minutes, leaving me enough time for the real thing: Getting into the software.
I tried to install SDL_mixer using the rpm too, and there never appeared a libSDL_mixer.a in /usr/lib.
Something doesn't seem to work here.
Installing something on Linux is such a PITA. I just wanted to get a GUI debugger frontend (DDD), and it says \"oh you need this package, and to run it, you need that package, which will in turn require the other package\".
If at all, I had to install one additional software to make something run on MS Windows, and usually everything comes packed together. Unless it is some Linux software someone has ported to Windows, that is. Heh.
Not that I would want to rant about Linux (again), but I still have neither a working KDevelop nor a GUI debugger frontend, after trying to get this to install for hours. On Windows, the time such a thing would take would have to be measured in minutes, leaving me enough time for the real thing: Getting into the software.
I just don't get why you are having so much trouble, cause I don't
Unfortunately I am just not *nix savvy enough to help...
I have gotten a lot of help from linuxforums.org in the past, have you tried there? You get the occasional eye rolling from 'em if you ask something (they consider) stupid, but they will usually at least tell you what's what.
Unfortunately I am just not *nix savvy enough to help...
I have gotten a lot of help from linuxforums.org in the past, have you tried there? You get the occasional eye rolling from 'em if you ask something (they consider) stupid, but they will usually at least tell you what's what.
My guess is either the RPM is corrupt or the RPM manager is not installed. You can check in the add/remove programs for the manager. You can also run a check sum on the RPM itself to check for file integrity.
You would install it as a source if the extension format was \"name.src.rpm\" if the name format is \"name.rpm\" then it is not a source install.
You would install it as a source if the extension format was \"name.src.rpm\" if the name format is \"name.rpm\" then it is not a source install.