Looking for recommendations on an LCD
Looking for recommendations on an LCD
I am looking at getting a 19\" LCD as a second monitor. I already have a CRT for gaming, so I'll mostly be using it for Windows applications. I was looking to spend $300-400. What are some good brands/models?
the samsung is worth shelling out the extra cash (based on the $300-400 proposal), while i haven't been able to invest in one (or the 25 or so i would want around the house lol), i have used them at friends, sold them to clients, and had one at a job i was at for a little while, and have REALLY REALLY dug 'em. Samsung is teh suck for some of their stuff... but they seem to have the LCD monitor thing DOWN!!! w00t w000t post too long!
- WarAdvocat
- DBB Defender
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2002 2:01 am
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
I have a Samsung 930b (8ms response time) and I see definate blurring in Descent3. Compared to a CRT, it can vary from somewhat to very difficult to see an opponent. Especially in a tank, moving fast, with the shake. It's pretty good for most other games, but I'd like a faster monitor for Descent-style games.
The Samsung 930bf on the other hand is supposed to have a 4ms (gray-to-gray) response time. I'm looking forward to checking one of these out
The Samsung 930bf on the other hand is supposed to have a 4ms (gray-to-gray) response time. I'm looking forward to checking one of these out
The only difference I can see between the 940B and the 930BF is the response time and the brightness. The 940 is brighter while the 930 has a 4ms response time rather than 8ms. Is that a big enough difference to warrant paying $50 more for a monitor that isn't as bright (please note again that I already have a great CRT for gaming)?
Re:
Plague wrote:The only difference I can see between the 940B and the 930BF is the response time and the brightness. The 940 is brighter while the 930 has a 4ms response time rather than 8ms. Is that a big enough difference to warrant paying $50 more for a monitor that isn't as bright (please note again that I already have a great CRT for gaming)?
that is a really tough decision to make... how important is taht $50 to you? if you are thinking in terms of it being 'just $50' then go for it, if you are thinking, 'damn thats a tank or two of gas' then move down.
also... i myself hate 'highly' bright monitors. it's a strain on the eyes, shortens lifespan, and does nothing to 'improve' picture. so for only $50 more you can get much faster response, with an equally tight picture, and a 'usable' brightness.... seems like the way to go for me, but it is ultimately your call.
I think I'm gonna go for the 930BF. Now for the last question. What is considered a good pixel policy? Samsung won't replace the monitor until it has 10 or more bad pixels. Newegg wants at least 8. ZipZoomFly will replace if 3 dead pixels are in the center (2\"x2\"), 4 pixels on the rest, or 6 total.
I was thinking that the last one would be the best, even though the price for the monitor is $25 more than at several other stores that I found.
I was thinking that the last one would be the best, even though the price for the monitor is $25 more than at several other stores that I found.
- Krom
- DBB Database Master
- Posts: 16137
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
- Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
- Contact:
Honestly dead pixels aren't that big of a problem, I've seen a lot of LCDs with no dead pixels at all. But even if you have a dead pixel or a stuck pixel once you get used to it you don't even notice them anymore. It is like AG lines on a CRT, at first you notice them but after a day or so you forget they are there and don't even see them anymore unless you look for them.
-
- Defender of the Night
- Posts: 13477
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Olathe, KS
- Contact:
I'd do a little research on that monitor and see how they measured the response time. Some measure black to white, some grey to grey and some black to white and back to black again. Lastly, make sure the thing has a DVI jack. I'd be very suprised if any modern video card doesn't have a DVI output.
"One spelling mistake can destroy your life. A Husband sent this to his wife : "I'm having a wonderful time. Wish you were her." - @RobinWilliams
- Krom
- DBB Database Master
- Posts: 16137
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
- Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
- Contact:
Amen on the DVI, it automatically fixes 99% of the tiny adjustments it takes to make an analog signal on a LCD line up and look right. But if you are going DVI, unless you get the latest and greatest widescreen Dell monitor which supports some DRM function, you won't be able to watch high def video on it.
- WarAdvocat
- DBB Defender
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2002 2:01 am
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
Re:
uhh...MD-2389 wrote:I'd do a little research on that monitor and see how they measured the response time. Some measure black to white, some grey to grey and some black to white and back to black again.
Gray to gray (supposedly) is the best measure of 'real-world' performance. Or something.WarAdvocat wrote:The Samsung 930bf on the other hand is supposed to have a 4ms (gray-to-gray) response time. I'm looking forward to checking one of these out
-
- Defender of the Night
- Posts: 13477
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Olathe, KS
- Contact:
no duh WA. However, if you noticed I wasn't replying to YOU. I was making a reply for Plague here to do research on LCD monitors he's interested in.
"One spelling mistake can destroy your life. A Husband sent this to his wife : "I'm having a wonderful time. Wish you were her." - @RobinWilliams
- WarAdvocat
- DBB Defender
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2002 2:01 am
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA