Flight 93 shot down?
I dunno...discuss.
Rumsfeld's Slip of the Tongue...
Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250
- Will Robinson
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 10135
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am
Freudian slip....maybe.
Or perhaps a man who works daily from a military perspective who during his whole long life the only way an enemy had ever taken down a plane was to 'shoot\" it down simply mis-spoke and used the word he was most familiar with when describing an enemy taking a plane down.
I still call them albums when everyone knows they are CD's....Bush said there were internets...does that mean he has secretly concealed the other networks from us?
Or perhaps a man who works daily from a military perspective who during his whole long life the only way an enemy had ever taken down a plane was to 'shoot\" it down simply mis-spoke and used the word he was most familiar with when describing an enemy taking a plane down.
I still call them albums when everyone knows they are CD's....Bush said there were internets...does that mean he has secretly concealed the other networks from us?
- Kilarin
- DBB Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 2403
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 2:01 am
- Location: South of Ft. Worth Texas
Just a stupid goof seems most likely. BUT, lets give the conspiracy theorists the benefit of the doubt on this one. I wouldn't be shocked if the flight over penn had been shot down. What else can you do with a plane targeted at a building, the civilians are dead either way. And THAT is something I could believe them covering up. Not great for public relations to admit you shot down a plane full of your own citizens, even if it WAS the right thing to do. Much better to make up a story about the passengers heroicly attacking the terrorists and a crash resulting during the fight.
Now, no, I don't believe the plane was shot down. We have a lot of civilians on the ground whos family members in the plane told them they were going to attack. So the story as is makes the most sense and wins according to Occams Razor. BUT, at least this particular conspiracy theory isn't blatantly illogical on it's face, I can come up with scenerios where it could be done and covered up. I don't think it WAS, but it is at least possible. And that puts it WAY ahead of the entire \"the government blew up the buildings\" theory.
Now, no, I don't believe the plane was shot down. We have a lot of civilians on the ground whos family members in the plane told them they were going to attack. So the story as is makes the most sense and wins according to Occams Razor. BUT, at least this particular conspiracy theory isn't blatantly illogical on it's face, I can come up with scenerios where it could be done and covered up. I don't think it WAS, but it is at least possible. And that puts it WAY ahead of the entire \"the government blew up the buildings\" theory.
- Iceman
- DBB Habitual Type Killer
- Posts: 4929
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2000 2:01 am
- Location: Huntsville, AL. USA
- Contact:
Listen closely to it ... no need to make a nountain out of a mole hill. He says \"the people who attacked the U.S. in New York and shot down the plane over Pennsylvania\". He is talking about it in the context of the terrorists downing it ... not the U.S. It's just a simple goof.
To think conspiracy on this one you would have to be a total retard.
To think conspiracy on this one you would have to be a total retard.