holy crap! who knew about this?Actual instances
In the 1970s a group of scientists from Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine in Cleveland Ohio, lead by Robert J. White, a neurosurgeon and professor of neurological surgery, performed a highly controversial operation to transplant the head of one monkey onto another’s body. The procedure was a success to some extent, with the animal being able to smell, taste, hear, and see the world around it. The operation involved cauterizing arteries and veins carefully while the head was being severed to prevent hypovolemia. Because the nerves were left entirely intact, connecting the brain to a blood supply kept it chemically alive. The animal survived for some time after the operation, even at times attempting to bite some of the staff. [1] In 2001 the operation was successfully repeated again on a monkey by the aforementioned Dr. White. [2]
The majority of neurosurgeons believe that head transplantation in humans will be possible in the near future. The procedure would most likely involve cooling the brain to the point where all neural activity stops. This is to prevent neurons from dying while the brain is being transplanted. In any case, few authorities support the risky procedure. Still, supporters note that the brain, unlike the liver for example, is an immunologically sound organ; there is no risk of the new body rejecting it. Ethical considerations, however, have thus far prevented any attempt by surgeons to transplant a human being's head.
Live Head Transplant
Live Head Transplant
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_trans ... _instances
- Will Robinson
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 10135
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am
- Vindicator
- DBB Benefactor
- Posts: 3166
- Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: southern IL, USA
- Contact:
- Mobius
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 7940
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
- Contact:
I have known about this for many years. There are some photos of the surgery floating around the web too. Caution you though: they aint pretty!
Technically, a head transplant is not that tricky in reality. The problem is of course, the spinal cord must be severed in order to achieve \"success\" and I don't know about you, but when I get MY brain transplanted into a new body, I want to be able to walk around, run, jump, and make love using it!
That would be the real trick: making having the old and new spinal cords link up - so that you'd have to learn how to use your body again, from scratch, but that would only take a year - and maybe less.
Technically, a head transplant is not that tricky in reality. The problem is of course, the spinal cord must be severed in order to achieve \"success\" and I don't know about you, but when I get MY brain transplanted into a new body, I want to be able to walk around, run, jump, and make love using it!
That would be the real trick: making having the old and new spinal cords link up - so that you'd have to learn how to use your body again, from scratch, but that would only take a year - and maybe less.
- Aggressor Prime
- DBB Captain
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: USA
First, I would believe that a male head on a female body wouldn't work. The organisms would have to be very similar for the two parts to accept each other. And I don't like the idea of cutting someone's head off as a medical practice. Where are you going to get the new body from, kill someone?
Also, this sounds like Robocop. Except you would use a machine body.
Also, this sounds like Robocop. Except you would use a machine body.
Yes perhaps, which is where neurons handy ability to learn/relearn comes in. They'd adapt (with extra help from some artificial neural regrowth encouraging chemicals and/or stemcells. huzzah!). From a larger standpoint, it's doubtful ANY 2 people's nervous systems are trained the same, regardless of sex. So a certain amount of re-learning would be involved regardless (where's Pandora when you need him). In The first few months (at least) post-operation you'd try to scratch your nose, but punch yourself in the face instead. Getting neurons to talk to one another is one thing, but getting them to actually understand eachother is another thing again - takes time. Luckily thesedays we have methods and medications to boost this learning process.Aggressor Prime wrote:First, I would believe that a male head on a female body wouldn't work. The organisms would have to be very similar for the two parts to accept each other.
And if you're talking about inter-sex head transplants, then you arn't just transplanting a brain onto a body - you're also transplanting a cocktail of inter-sex hormones into your blood/brain chemistry. Probabaly something else to keep in mind.
The preservation of individual consciousness is what it's all about anyway, and (arguably... as depending on your personal definition of self) that would be preserved.
well it'd be a life-saving procedure. Since i have my doubts about the existance of a worthwhile afterlife, i like the idea of removing a head better than i like the idea of DYING, don't you?And I don't like the idea of cutting someone's head off as a medical practice. Where are you going to get the new body from, kill someone?
it's plausible you could clone a body for yourself, alla The Island. But short of that, just harvest the body of someone who is brain-dead, ppl's brains die all the time. So, they need a brain, you need a body, pool your resources and party ^_^.
yep, fictional sci-fi is a good source of inspiration for researchers (*). Remember monkeys controling robots via thought has been done too?Also, this sounds like Robocop. Except you would use a machine body.
* http://www.technovelgy.com a website dedicated to the documentation of such things: new REAL technologys which have been inspired by fictional sci-fi of the past.
- Badboy
- DBB Ace
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: PTMC Weapon Division No. 22864
- Contact:
wow nice explination, sounds like you have done this before, where do you work? Anyway I have seen the Island thats a great movie. But to bring someone alive with someone elses brain isnt really right because they didn't ask for that body they wern't born with it. And it would be tough having to get the neurons and movements of that human to work correct and they might not work 100%. It would be alot of work,roid wrote:Yes perhaps, which is where neurons handy ability to learn/relearn comes in. They'd adapt (with extra help from some artificial neural regrowth encouraging chemicals and/or stemcells. huzzah!). From a larger standpoint, it's doubtful ANY 2 people's nervous systems are trained the same, regardless of sex. So a certain amount of re-learning would be involved regardless (where's Pandora when you need him). In The first few months (at least) post-operation you'd try to scratch your nose, but punch yourself in the face instead. Getting neurons to talk to one another is one thing, but getting them to actually understand eachother is another thing again - takes time. Luckily thesedays we have methods and medications to boost this learning process.Aggressor Prime wrote:First, I would believe that a male head on a female body wouldn't work. The organisms would have to be very similar for the two parts to accept each other.
And if you're talking about inter-sex head transplants, then you arn't just transplanting a brain onto a body - you're also transplanting a cocktail of inter-sex hormones into your blood/brain chemistry. Probabaly something else to keep in mind.
The preservation of individual consciousness is what it's all about anyway, and (arguably... as depending on your personal definition of self) that would be preserved.
well it'd be a life-saving procedure. Since i have my doubts about the existance of a worthwhile afterlife, i like the idea of removing a head better than i like the idea of DYING, don't you?And I don't like the idea of cutting someone's head off as a medical practice. Where are you going to get the new body from, kill someone?
it's plausible you could clone a body for yourself, alla The Island. But short of that, just harvest the body of someone who is brain-dead, ppl's brains die all the time. So, they need a brain, you need a body, pool your resources and party ^_^.
yep, fictional sci-fi is a good source of inspiration for researchers (*). Remember monkeys controling robots via thought has been done too?Also, this sounds like Robocop. Except you would use a machine body.
* http://www.technovelgy.com a website dedicated to the documentation of such things: new REAL technologys which have been inspired by fictional sci-fi of the past.
I say If someone dies let them die God has a reason for that, man is trying to play god and bring life into his world. Man will be punished for that.
- Lothar
- DBB Ghost Admin
- Posts: 12133
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: I'm so glad to be home
- Contact:
I think it makes more sense to conceive of this as a body transplant than a head transplant... the head is the \"uniquely you\" section you're preserving, and the whole rest of the body is the life support system you're attaching it to.
I don't see any difference between this and a heart transplant, except for the physical mass of a whole body vs. a heart.
I don't see any difference between this and a heart transplant, except for the physical mass of a whole body vs. a heart.
but no-one gets asked what we want before we're born, much to the disadvantage of transex people. Not to mention the issue that we don't even ask to live in the first place! it's more of a "Surprise! Welcome to the pointless mortal realm! Try the Pizza it's great!" no choice matter.Badboy wrote:wow nice explination, sounds like you have done this before, where do you work? Anyway I have seen the Island thats a great movie. But to bring someone alive with someone elses brain isnt really right because they didn't ask for that body they wern't born with it. And it would be tough having to get the neurons and movements of that human to work correct and they might not work 100%. It would be alot of work,
well... i tell people i'm agnostic until i'm confronted with conservatives... then i tear off my clothes, slit the throat of a male goat, draw big pentagrams over my body with it's blood and wear it's head as a hat, then run around in a circle UNFUNF sodmomising it's corpse while screaming shrilly "GOD DOESN'T EXIST!!!" & laughing maniacly. Then at the end of it all i slam the head down on the carpet... stand atop it...Badboy wrote:I say If someone dies let them die God has a reason for that, man is trying to play god and bring life into his world. Man will be punished for that.
WRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!
gets the party started
so true about the \"is it a head trnasplant or a body transplant\" thing. Coz such things make one wonder about the nature of consciousness no? Is consciousness really ENTIRELY in your head? perhaps by seperateing the head from teh body, you are doing the equivalent of a LOBOTOMY on the person's personality! Just as a lobotomy seperates sections of the brain and changes who we are - we know that who we are is more than just stored in our brains, the most familure non-brain personality organ people realise is the heart - or maybe the gonads (you know, the \"little brain\" ). Ie: when we transplant a heart, aspects of teh personality are strangely taken with it.
what makes us who we are? what makes us... US?!
so a person who gets ANY form of organ transplant, are they really entirely themselvs anymore? but if they arn't themselves, who are they? and what has happened of the person who donated the heart, are they techniaclly still living while their heart lives in some other body? there are aspects of their persoanlity that are livign on!
with organ transplants we've already crossed the lines of entity seperation, where i can partially be you and you can partially be me.
Where does one draw the line? and wait a sec, who says we NEED a line?
do we perhaps assign our IDENTITY to the biggest mass of flesh? ie: a brain is just an organ. if removed... it could be considered seperate from the greater body. But we all beleive that our consciousness (as we currently understand it anyway) is located in the brain. So are we just our brains? Or are we our bodys, that can be seperated from our brains and seen as SEPERATE to our brain? who are WE? What makes us the entitys that we are?!
if we're just talking MASS, then what about if someone had radical lyposuction surgury, where the weight of the fat removed was GREATER than the mass that's left!
now we're talking about FAT ENTITYS
don't be afriad
what makes us who we are? what makes us... US?!
so a person who gets ANY form of organ transplant, are they really entirely themselvs anymore? but if they arn't themselves, who are they? and what has happened of the person who donated the heart, are they techniaclly still living while their heart lives in some other body? there are aspects of their persoanlity that are livign on!
with organ transplants we've already crossed the lines of entity seperation, where i can partially be you and you can partially be me.
Where does one draw the line? and wait a sec, who says we NEED a line?
do we perhaps assign our IDENTITY to the biggest mass of flesh? ie: a brain is just an organ. if removed... it could be considered seperate from the greater body. But we all beleive that our consciousness (as we currently understand it anyway) is located in the brain. So are we just our brains? Or are we our bodys, that can be seperated from our brains and seen as SEPERATE to our brain? who are WE? What makes us the entitys that we are?!
if we're just talking MASS, then what about if someone had radical lyposuction surgury, where the weight of the fat removed was GREATER than the mass that's left!
now we're talking about FAT ENTITYS
don't be afriad