What President Bush should say...

[Nightshade]

My fellow Americans.

I come to you now, gravely aware that what I am about to say will radically change the course of what we have, for nearly five long years now, called the war on terror.

Over the past few years, then, the United States has supported fledgling democracies in Afghanistan,Iraq, and the Palestinian Authority. We have proudly assisted in making free and fair elections possible in these places, and with excellent results -- at least with regard to the freeness and the fairness of the elections. But the fact is, when these peoples have spoken, what we have heard, or should have been hearing, in the expression of their collective will is that the mechanics of democracy alone (one citizen, one vote) do not automatically manufacture democrats -- if by democrats we mean citizens who believe first and foremost in the kind of liberty that guarantees freedom of conscience and equality before the law.

On the contrary, each of these new democracies has produced constitutions that enshrine Islamic law. Because Islamic law, known as \"Shariah,\" does not permit equality between the sexes or among religions, it is anything but what we in American consider \"democratic.\"

Indeed, Shariah law endows Muslims, and Muslim men in particular, with a superior position in society. It also outlaws words and deeds that oppose this, frankly, repressive power structure for being \"un-Islamic.\" From this same Islamic legal tradition comes the mandate for jihad (holy war, usually against non-Muslims) and dhimmitude, the official state of inferiority of non-Muslims under Islam.

With their devotion to Islamic tradition, then, these new democracies have, in effect, peacefully voted themselves into the same doctrinal camp as the many terror groups that violently strike at the non-Muslim world in the name of jihad for the sake of a caliphate -- a Muslim world government ruled according to Shariah.

So be it. What I mean by that is, it is neither in the national interest nor in the national will for the United States of America to attempt to reshape such a culture to conform to our notions of liberty and justice for all. It is neither in the national interest nor in the national will to attempt to reform the belief system that animates this culture to conform to our notions of freedom of worship.

It is, however, in our national interest, and must become a part of our national will, to ensure that Islamic law does not come to our own shores, whether by means of violent jihad terrorism as practiced by the likes of al Qaeda or Hezbollah, or through peaceful patterns of migration, such as those that have already Islamized large parts of Europe.

The shift I am describing-from a pro-democracy offensive to an anti-Shariah defensive -- means a national course correction. Rather than continuing to emphasize the democratization of the Muslim Middle East as our key tool in the war on terror, I will henceforth emphasize the prevention of Shariah from reaching the West as our key tool in the war on terror.

This will entail the immediate adoption of the following steps.

www.jihadwatch.com

[Will Robinson]

Dude! If you're going to offer nothing but another persons thoughts to stir the pot you should at least wait until they finish cooking the thought before copy/pasting it here for the rest of us to digest in the absence of your own contribution!

[Bet51987]

Dude! If you're going to offer nothing but another persons thoughts to stir the pot you should at least wait until they finish cooking the thought before copy/pasting it here for the rest of us to digest in the absence of your own contribution!

Exactly. I can read the same stuff almost everywhere else. However, for the pot, if this ever became an Islamic world I would slit my wrists.

Bettina

[Lothar]

Dude! If you're going to offer nothing but another persons thoughts to stir the pot you should at least wait until they finish cooking the thought before copy/pasting it here for the rest of us to digest in the absence of your own contribution!

Agreed.

I don't mind cut/paste on occasion... but try to post complete and original thought most of the time.