Halo 2 PC
- DarkFlameWolf
- DBB Admiral
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: North Carolina
- Krom
- DBB Database Master
- Posts: 16137
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
- Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
- Contact:
Re:
Of course those programs suck because Microsoft has a monopoly on the market and can't include really good programs with it because of legal pressures.Munk wrote:If you open any Windows version out of the box, you will find that you cannot do anything with it. For each thing you want to do you will need a ton of extra software, because - let me put it in words - all those shipped software sucks (Internet Explorer, Media Player, MSN Instant Messanger ...)
Re:
o_0Munk wrote:If you open any Windows version out of the box, you will find that you cannot do anything with it. For each thing you want to do you will need a ton of extra software, because - let me put it in words - all those shipped software sucks (Internet Explorer, Media Player, MSN Instant Messanger ...)
what does that have to do with Halo 2 PC? just curious..
I didn't really mean this to become another Vista bashing thread... not that it isn't "justified". What do you guys think of what you see in the trailer? the Halo 3 trailer looked pretty good too.
- Aus-RED-5
- DBB Friend
- Posts: 1604
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 7:27 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
- Contact:
Re:
heheDuper wrote:o_0Munk wrote:If you open any Windows version out of the box, you will find that you cannot do anything with it. For each thing you want to do you will need a ton of extra software, because - let me put it in words - all those shipped software sucks (Internet Explorer, Media Player, MSN Instant Messanger ...)
what does that have to do with Halo 2 PC? just curious..
I didn't really mean this to become another Vista bashing thread... not that it isn't "justified". What do you guys think of what you see in the trailer? the Halo 3 trailer looked pretty good too.
I was thinking the same thing.
After watching the Video. This version of Halo 2 looks far better then the one released for the Xbox.
Its a shame that they would only release this version for Vista.
Having said that, just because Halo 2 is ment for Vista doesn't mean that someone won't hack it to get it to work on XP.
- TIGERassault
- DBB Admiral
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 3:33 pm
Re:
Seriously, concidering that Halo 1 PC didn't really have a full editor. They said something about real time file sharing where levels are concerned. What I'm a bit curious and possibly miffed about is that you have to be a "Gold" member (.er.. yeah.. whatever) to play with folks on xboxes through LIVE. meh..TIGERassault wrote:The biggest bonus it has over the Xbox version is the level editor!
- []V[]essenjah
- DBB Defender
- Posts: 3512
- Joined: Mon Dec 20, 1999 3:01 am
I fully agree on this one. Kyouryuu, you should just get a regular X-Box and play it if you don't like the expense. I'm sure lots of people have extra Box's laying around somewhere. I still really enjoy Halo, but it being on the X-Box is what makes half the fun. The atmosphere, just sitting on the couch with your buds and linking two or three TV's together for a serious game. That's fun. I miss the days when I could do that. Good times.
I wouldn't rush out and buy Vista and Halo 2. Especially since it is a 3 year old FPS game.
Not only that, but it looks exactly like it did on X-Box. Just higher resolutions. Yay?
I wouldn't rush out and buy Vista and Halo 2. Especially since it is a 3 year old FPS game.
Not only that, but it looks exactly like it did on X-Box. Just higher resolutions. Yay?
- TIGERassault
- DBB Admiral
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 3:33 pm
Re:
It doesn't require DX10 for it's graphics capability, it requires DX10 because that's what it was made in, and that's the most efficient free thing out there for the job.Kyouryuu wrote:It's very difficult for me to care about a three year old FPS, let alone the company asking me to pay $199 + $50 to play it. The fact that it requires DX10 is ridiculous. If Half-Life 3 or a likewise game that pushes the graphics envelope wants to, that's fine. But Halo 2? That's just petty.
Re:
Oh pishaw. I haven't played Halo 2 at all. I also buy games that are well over 3 years old ...not for much though. What's wrong with playing a game 3 years old??? Cripes, Descent is what.. 10..11 years old now? I STILL play D1. btw, Halo PC still sees about 1000+ players every night.[]V[]essenjah wrote: I wouldn't rush out and buy Vista and Halo 2. Especially since it is a 3 year old FPS game.
I'm not going to get it as I'm not happy with being strong armed into having to buy a new OS.
- TIGERassault
- DBB Admiral
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 3:33 pm
Re:
At least it'll still be there when you get a new computer!Foil wrote:I never got to finish the Halo 2 campaign when I borrowed a friend's XBox a couple years ago.
I'd love to play it on PC... but requiring that I buy Vista just makes it way too expensive for me right now.
-
- DBB Captain
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Trinidad, West Indies
- Contact:
Re:
You finally said something noteworthy. =PSpaceboy wrote:Macs are trying to become Pcs, and Pcs are trying to become macs. when they find the middleground, macs're going to die 'cause of being 50x the price.
Ie, a mac charging plug being 200$ as opposed to a 5$ line for a pc.
That's really true. Macs are trying to become PCs... I noticed this a long time ago. They still aren't as good as PCs, though. And PCs are trying to become macs... well at least they'll be easier to use! =)
Uh... were we talking about something? Halo 2? What? ^_~
Re:
No. The Xbox had the technical equivalent of DirectX 8.1. Dozens of games have been ported from the Xbox to the PC that didn't require DirectX 10. This was a conscientious decision to boost the sales of Windows Vista and promote the Games for Windows initiative.TIGERassault wrote:It doesn't require DX10 for it's graphics capability, it requires DX10 because that's what it was made in, and that's the most efficient free thing out there for the job.
- TIGERassault
- DBB Admiral
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 3:33 pm
Re:
I would have thought that, but Microsoft didn't need to use DX10 as a reason to make it Vista-only.Kyouryuu wrote:No. The Xbox had the technical equivalent of DirectX 8.1. Dozens of games have been ported from the Xbox to the PC that didn't require DirectX 10. This was a conscientious decision to boost the sales of Windows Vista and promote the Games for Windows initiative.TIGERassault wrote:It doesn't require DX10 for it's graphics capability, it requires DX10 because that's what it was made in, and that's the most efficient free thing out there for the job.
Re:
TIGERassault wrote:I would have thought that, but Microsoft didn't need to use DX10 as a reason to make it Vista-only.Kyouryuu wrote:No. The Xbox had the technical equivalent of DirectX 8.1. Dozens of games have been ported from the Xbox to the PC that didn't require DirectX 10. This was a conscientious decision to boost the sales of Windows Vista and promote the Games for Windows initiative.TIGERassault wrote:It doesn't require DX10 for it's graphics capability, it requires DX10 because that's what it was made in, and that's the most efficient free thing out there for the job.