Photography Blog (Updated - December11th/07)
Moderators: MetalBeast, Capm
Photography Blog (Updated - December11th/07)
Hi,
Well I thought it would be more interesting to start some sort of blog to show my photography rather then making new topics every time I upload a new photo.
I have been playing around with lighting and composition. Trying to make them look professional so they can sell on stock photo sites. I'm learning a lot doing this and I think it will help in all types of photography. The photos below have all been edited in post... its so hard to get a white background without proper equipment.
Comments and suggestions are welcome as always.
Well I thought it would be more interesting to start some sort of blog to show my photography rather then making new topics every time I upload a new photo.
I have been playing around with lighting and composition. Trying to make them look professional so they can sell on stock photo sites. I'm learning a lot doing this and I think it will help in all types of photography. The photos below have all been edited in post... its so hard to get a white background without proper equipment.
Comments and suggestions are welcome as always.
Aus-RED-5 --> I am using a Digital Rebel XTi 40D with the 100-400L zoom lens. I have 3 other lenses also. The first pics on this thread were taken with my old camera Canon Powershot G5
KoolBear --> Just in my backyard. requires patience though cuzz sometimes the birds only stop by for a few minutes and you never see them again.
Here another photo.
KoolBear --> Just in my backyard. requires patience though cuzz sometimes the birds only stop by for a few minutes and you never see them again.
Here another photo.
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9781
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
- Wishmaster
- DBB Ace
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:48 pm
- Location: In the mines
bleepinistic... lol
Merlin I paid $1,410.00(no tax) for the 100-400L. I would go with the L series. I love this lens. The quality of the 100-400L and the EF 100mm macro are quite a bit better then my other lenses. I wouldn't go with the 180L though its expensive and isn't much better in quality.
These are review sites. I found them helpful.
http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/index.html
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/
Do you find the Xti's lcd too glarey? In bright sun I literally get temperary blinded by reflections when I look at the camera...
Merlin I paid $1,410.00(no tax) for the 100-400L. I would go with the L series. I love this lens. The quality of the 100-400L and the EF 100mm macro are quite a bit better then my other lenses. I wouldn't go with the 180L though its expensive and isn't much better in quality.
These are review sites. I found them helpful.
http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/index.html
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/
Do you find the Xti's lcd too glarey? In bright sun I literally get temperary blinded by reflections when I look at the camera...
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9781
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
I'm dimmed the LCD so it doesn't suck battery power much. I never really look at it unless I want to see what the pic looks like before I take another.
Man, 1400 is pricey for me. I paid $1000 for the camera, 18-55 USM lens, bag, extra battery, battery grip and UV haze filter. It was a deal at Best Buy.
The lenses I've looked at are the 75-300USM and a macro which I haven't decided on.
Man, 1400 is pricey for me. I paid $1000 for the camera, 18-55 USM lens, bag, extra battery, battery grip and UV haze filter. It was a deal at Best Buy.
The lenses I've looked at are the 75-300USM and a macro which I haven't decided on.
Yea its pricey but its worth it.
I don't know anything about the 75-300 but it has a good zoom range. I would get the EF100mm macro lens. If you buy extension tubes you can put them inbetween your lenses and focus even closer. I can fill a frame with a grain of rice if I wanted to. Kinda neat I thought.
I don't know anything about the 75-300 but it has a good zoom range. I would get the EF100mm macro lens. If you buy extension tubes you can put them inbetween your lenses and focus even closer. I can fill a frame with a grain of rice if I wanted to. Kinda neat I thought.
Some MORE nice work Cyclone (see my post re: your web site for further feedback)
These shots are very good - and I'm saying that as a fellow professional.
A few short comments which you can take or leave as you see fit.
While the macro work on the tin toys is good, I can understand why a stock library would say no to them. Stock libraries know that their most important customer segments would be graphic designers, advertising agencies, magazines, web designers and the like. These people are looking for images that become metaphors or ilustrations of larger concepts ...and right now that's not coming through in your toy images. Take those same tin toys however and surround them with props that all scream \"1940s nostalga\" and I reckon that you'll be able to sell them.
Also, all those toys were framed in the same way - you need to break it up and vary it more with a series of shots like this. With the car for example, get down in front of the car and shoot from there - as if it was about to run you over... (or put the tin bird next to a real one on a white background ...and all of a sudden your series has a bit more interest in it.
The live bird shots are excellent. I know what your friend was getting at with the cropping. What I would do if I were you is crop the images so there is space for copy (words) along side them. With image no. 12 for example, put the bird in the bottom right hand corner instead - or in the middle of a left-side / right-side third ..this leaves plenty of room for me as a graphic designer to add a headline and sub head next to the picture - this creates a nice static layout with plenty of colour and contrast for the eye to wander over. In effect it stops being just a picture of a bird and starts being a masthead of a magazine article on birds, or gardens, or nature, or the environment... and right away you've got four different uses from the same image (and four different sales for the stock library! )
If you can create images that suggest/illustrate a number of larger concepts, while slotting effortlessly into a press / editorial layout with plenty of room for copy, then you're MUCH more likely to sell your images to libraries or agencies.
No disrespect though - it's still all good work. Keep it up!
These shots are very good - and I'm saying that as a fellow professional.
A few short comments which you can take or leave as you see fit.
While the macro work on the tin toys is good, I can understand why a stock library would say no to them. Stock libraries know that their most important customer segments would be graphic designers, advertising agencies, magazines, web designers and the like. These people are looking for images that become metaphors or ilustrations of larger concepts ...and right now that's not coming through in your toy images. Take those same tin toys however and surround them with props that all scream \"1940s nostalga\" and I reckon that you'll be able to sell them.
Also, all those toys were framed in the same way - you need to break it up and vary it more with a series of shots like this. With the car for example, get down in front of the car and shoot from there - as if it was about to run you over... (or put the tin bird next to a real one on a white background ...and all of a sudden your series has a bit more interest in it.
The live bird shots are excellent. I know what your friend was getting at with the cropping. What I would do if I were you is crop the images so there is space for copy (words) along side them. With image no. 12 for example, put the bird in the bottom right hand corner instead - or in the middle of a left-side / right-side third ..this leaves plenty of room for me as a graphic designer to add a headline and sub head next to the picture - this creates a nice static layout with plenty of colour and contrast for the eye to wander over. In effect it stops being just a picture of a bird and starts being a masthead of a magazine article on birds, or gardens, or nature, or the environment... and right away you've got four different uses from the same image (and four different sales for the stock library! )
If you can create images that suggest/illustrate a number of larger concepts, while slotting effortlessly into a press / editorial layout with plenty of room for copy, then you're MUCH more likely to sell your images to libraries or agencies.
No disrespect though - it's still all good work. Keep it up!
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9781
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
Well, yesterdya I ended up buying the 70-300mm Canon IS USM lens. I had tried the 75-300 non IS(Image Stabilizer) lens and man, talk about camera shake. The IS one is a godsend. And being able to zoom in is da bomb. Now, all I need is a good macro and some of those extensions you mentioned that I read about.
CDN_Merlin - IS is very helpful I agree. 2-3 stops lower in shutter speed helps a lot.
Gekko71 - Thanks for the advice. Everything you said makes sense to me and has been 'floating' around in my head for some time now. I just have to differentiate between artistic photos and photos meant to be more commercial/advertising. The tin-toys were my fist attempt at commercial type photos. I bought some studio lights, built a light tent etc so I have more freedmom now setting up my shots. I will try to mix it up a little and incorperate your advice. Thanks.
Gekko71 - Thanks for the advice. Everything you said makes sense to me and has been 'floating' around in my head for some time now. I just have to differentiate between artistic photos and photos meant to be more commercial/advertising. The tin-toys were my fist attempt at commercial type photos. I bought some studio lights, built a light tent etc so I have more freedmom now setting up my shots. I will try to mix it up a little and incorperate your advice. Thanks.
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9781
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
Re:
No worries Cyclone - Like I said, you work is genuinely good, and with a few small changes it can become eminently useable for commercial graphic design / advertising purposes. And being able to turn your interst into your profession is very rewarding...Cyclone wrote:CDN_Merlin - IS is very helpful I agree. 2-3 stops lower in shutter speed helps a lot.
Gekko71 - Thanks for the advice. Everything you said makes sense to me and has been 'floating' around in my head for some time now. I just have to differentiate between artistic photos and photos meant to be more commercial/advertising. The tin-toys were my fist attempt at commercial type photos. I bought some studio lights, built a light tent etc so I have more freedmom now setting up my shots. I will try to mix it up a little and incorperate your advice. Thanks.
...But keep shooting for yourself too! The Advertising stuff will get you paid work and keep feeding you and your family. But ALWAYS keep shooting for yourself too - cause the work you do for yourself - that's the work that truly feeds the soul and helps one realise their full potential for happiness.
Keep it up!
CDN_Merlin --> Another fellow canadian
Gekko71 --> Thank you for the constructive critism and confidence in my skills. Thats how you learn.. and I like learning lol.
Kilarin --> thanks. I to take more then dozens of pics befor I get one thats decent.
a few crops of the the dog photo above. Like the first, second or third dog crop? thanks.
#1(same as above)
#2
#3
Gekko71 --> Thank you for the constructive critism and confidence in my skills. Thats how you learn.. and I like learning lol.
Kilarin --> thanks. I to take more then dozens of pics befor I get one thats decent.
a few crops of the the dog photo above. Like the first, second or third dog crop? thanks.
#1(same as above)
#2
#3