Betsomenumber wrote:Sirius (sorry, Dak, thanks for the correction) wrote:It would be impossible for an atheist to be elected President in this day and age anyway, I'm sure you recognise that.
Sadly, I do. It's a shame that people in this country still hold on to the misconception that morals are tied to a God so the candidate that's more God like should win. However, I still have to vote for the team that will have less of a trigger finger.
That's an assumption on your part, Bettina, because of your atheistic beliefs. I would argue that morals
are tied to
God, but not to "religion". A claim to follow God does not make a person like God, nor does not following God automatically make a person unlike him. Show me someone who doesn't believe in God, who holds to
solid morals all around, and I'll show you someone who isn't far from the God of the Bible (I know of
no examples, especially in the political arena... did you have someone in particular in mind?). The Bible is the
standard for absolute morality, despite deluded attempts to separate the two. Through it God reveals his character.
"We can be good without believing in God!" Congratulations, but without a connection to the source of morality, morality crumbles or is undermined. "Moral decline": it is the natural course of events, apart from the source of morality. It can be resisted (to whatever degree of success), but it
is the inescapable norm, apart from the salvation that is in Jesus Christ (I bet you didn't know that. 2 Peter 1:4).
Frankly the only reason not to think so is the assumption to the contrary.