Who will win

For discussion of life's issues: current events, social trends and personal opinions.

Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250

Post Reply
User avatar
woodchip
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
Posts: 17865
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 1999 2:01 am

Who will win

Post by woodchip »

Nope, not a political candidate question. We all know (or should) that the libs are trying to compete with conservative talk radio by hiring Al Frankenstein to host Air America. What some of you may not realize is that the NRA is getting into the act. They will host a live internet program and have bought their very own radio station.
Now I've been wondering how the NRA was going to handle the McCain/Feingold restrictions on free speech and now I see how. By getting into the "news" business, the NRA will now neatly be able to by-pass M/F and present to the public political ads...oops! I mean news stories of their choosing.
So the question is, a year from now, which organisation do you think will still be viable? I know where I'll put my money.
User avatar
Lothar
DBB Ghost Admin
DBB Ghost Admin
Posts: 12133
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
Location: I'm so glad to be home
Contact:

Post by Lothar »

Well, Air America (Franken's radio show) may already be in trouble. Apologies for the incomplete formatting...

http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110004957
Air America, the liberal radio network that's been on the air only a few weeks, may be collapsing under the weight of bad management. The Chicago Tribune reports that the network was bounced off the air in two of America's three biggest cities yesterday:

Arthur Liu, owner of Multicultural Radio Broadcasting, which owns Air America affiliates WNTD-950 AM in Chicago and KBLA-1580 AM in Los Angeles, said Air America bounced a check and owes him more than $1 million.

Air America and Multicultural had entered into a time brokerage agreement in which the network was essentially renting Multicultural's airtime, Liu said.

"They bounced a check today," Liu said. "It's a default. They have paid only a very small portion of what they owe us." Liu declined to say how much Multicultural is owed, but did say he is holding $1 million in checks that Air America has asked the company not to cash.


This leaves Air America broadcasting in only six markets--New York, Minneapolis, Riverside, Calif.; West Palm Beach and Key West, Fla.; and Plattsburgh, N.Y.--as well as on the XM and Sirius satellite radio networks.

Air America's chairman, Evan Cohen, calls Liu's account "an outright lie," and the network has filed a lawsuit--reproduced by The Smoking Gun--against Multicultural. And things get weirder. The Air America Web site features a statement titled "The Sludge Report"--a satire of the Drudge Report, which featured the story yesterday--that is bizarrely juvenile in tone:

Normally we'd let this go because "habitual liars" like Drudge are laughable, and ridicule is our business.

But Arthur Liu--not funny. He lied to us, he ripped us off and now we're chasing him down with a pipe wrench. It's a metaphor.

Here's what really happened:

This Liu-ser was ripping off our boss Evan Cohen big time (he can't do that, that's our job). Evan found out about it and he stopped payment on a check to keep Liu-cifer from ripping him off even more. You can touch Evan for the occasional meal or drinks but a million bucks is crossing the line. And if we ever get low on cash, we can always call Barbra Streisand. Or any of the Baldwins. Except Stephen.

So we got screwed, Liu'd, and tattooed. How Liu can you get? In Liu of payment. Liu'd and lascivious behavior. These write themselves. What we're getting at is that we hate him.

So now everyone's saying we're going down the dumper in Chicago and Los Angeles, but what they don't tell you is that we're still on in Portland. And we OWN Portland. And let's not forget Riverside and Plattsburgh. And New York. And streaming on the internet. And XM. And Sirius. Actually we're fine.


The statement also urges people to phone Liu and supplies a New York phone number. On his Web site, Neal Boortz, a conservative radio host (last item of today's report, which should eventually be archived here), raises some questions about Air America's business practices (ellipses in original):

What in the hell is Air America doing paying radio stations to air their programming? We don't. Rush doesn't, neither does Hannity. Is the liberal message so vapid and unappealing that these people actually have to pay stations to put it on the air?

Here's a little more information for you.

Jim Watkins is the program director for my affiliates in Naples and Ft. Meyers [sic], Florida (WINK-AM and WNOG-AM). Several weeks ago he contacted the people at Air America to inquire about putting Al Franken somewhere on his radio station. Watkins remembered Al Franken from his Saturday Night Live days and felt that he might be entertaining and could draw an audience.

So ... Watkins gets an official from Air America on the phone. The Air America official asks Jim what other programs they carry. Jim starts rattling off the names. Boortz, Limbaugh, Savage .... At that point the Air America official says "Stop." He then informs Watkins that they won't allow their programming to air on WINK and WNOG. And why not? Because "We don't want our programming stained by being on a station that carries Rush Limbaugh."


Air America apparently doesn't object to all right-wing talk shows. KCAA, the Riverside, Calif.-area station that carries Franken's "The O'Franken Factor," also broadcasts Watergate personage G. Gordon Liddy's show in the early afternoon. Refusing to share a station with Limbaugh would seem a foolish strategy; Limbaugh's long and successful track record makes it unlikely that many stations would drop him in favor of Franken and friends, so the sole effect of this policy is to make it harder to get Air America shows on the air. No wonder the network has to resort to buying air time.

If Air America fails, it will be in part because of bad management. One also has to wonder if the network's entire premise--that talk radio is dominated by the right, and there's a demand for a left-wing answer to Limbaugh, Hannity, et al.--is faulty. After all, it's not as if the rest of the media aren't already saturated with liberal-left viewpoints.
User avatar
bash
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 5042
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
Location: Texas

Post by bash »

Much is being made about the fact that AA is paying its few affilaites to be on the air. That's a little bizarre considering most content providers get paid for their content. One of the Great Lies of the Left, imo, is that they are the Silent Majority rather than the conservatives. I'm afraid AA's nosedive is exposing that myth. It's only a matter of time, I think, before we start hearing shrieks of VAST RIGHTWING CONSPIRACY if AA continues it's present trajectory.
User avatar
Kyouryuu
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 5775
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Isla Nublar
Contact:

Post by Kyouryuu »

I think Air America is a stupid idea.

I mean, I'm leftist, but even I would admit that the most fun comes when the two sides have to butt heads with one another. Like, if you ever watch Meet the Press and you have the designated representives of the right and the left bickering. It's fun. Coincidentally, that's also when government works best - when the two parties are so busy being at each other's throats that neither can actually fulfill their agenda. It's no fun when there's no argument.

What the liberals should break down and accept is that to compete with the likes of Limbaugh, Savage, and Hannity, they should be prepared to take their programs to the same station as the right.

The sort of isolationist "I scratch your back, you scratch mine" is what makes programs like Hannity's so irritating. He doesn't welcome debate and he always interrupts his guests if he disagrees with them, rarely giving them a chance to explain themselves. And, what it seems like Air America is trying to do is create a "safe haven" like this for liberals so they may do the same irritating thing.

It ain't interesting.

Interesting debate comes from two zealous party members on opposing sides arguing and bickering over issues, not the sycophantic rhetoric we've been seeing and hearing lately.
Post Reply