Obama and his space weapons ban

For discussion of life's issues: current events, social trends and personal opinions.

Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250

Post Reply
User avatar
Will Robinson
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10124
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am

Obama and his space weapons ban

Post by Will Robinson »

\"President Barack Obama's pledge to seek a worldwide ban on weapons in space marks a dramatic shift in U.S. policy\"

Is he really as smart as he is and yet this naive when it comes to foriegn policy?
Work on classified projects involving an \"active\" military response to attacks against U.S. satellites might be halted in favor of more monitoring and passive protection measures, he said. He declined to give any more details.
More 'monitoring and passive measures' is like what Clinton did with the N. Koreans regarding weapons grade nuclear material production! And they in turn laughed at Clinton, took all he gave them to stop production and at the same time continued development!!

I keep telling myself Obama's too smart to shoot America in the foot like that but with all the Pelosis in charge if he thinks he can publicly say we won't do it and then count on the defense department to do it covertly I think he's crazy. Knowing your congress is run by wacko liberals like Pelosi you end up in jail for life trying to get the job done.

Reagan had the confidence of guys like Oliver North who understood the duty. Obama has the confidence of who?!?

Let make a prediction for you all to remember in about 50 years: He who can't fight in space is living under the umbrella of his enemy!
User avatar
SilverFJ
DBB Cowboy
Posts: 2043
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Missoula, Montana
Contact:

Post by SilverFJ »

He won't have to worry dude, he'll be busy at a beach barbeque with Hamas somewhere at the time.
User avatar
d3jake
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 10:08 am
Location: Minnesota, USA

Post by d3jake »

Wasn't there a ban like this back during the cold war..?
User avatar
SilverFJ
DBB Cowboy
Posts: 2043
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Missoula, Montana
Contact:

Post by SilverFJ »

Reagan DID try and institute a national space-based laser missile defense system... :P
Gooberman
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 6155
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 1999 3:01 am
Location: tempe Az

Re: Obama and his space weapons ban

Post by Gooberman »

Will Robinson wrote:Let make a prediction for you all to remember in about 50 years: He who can't fight in space is living under the umbrella of his enemy!
The problem with weaponizing space for national defense, is no other country in the world views that as "defense!"

If we do it, others will follow suit, in the name of "defense." And what then? Will we borrow more money from the chinese to make ours better? They already own our proverbial nuts, and that wasn't Clinton or Obama's doing.
User avatar
Duper
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 9214
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA

Post by Duper »

I thought Carter was first to bring this up in the SALT treaties. .. then Reagan usurped that. You know.. Carter, the guy you called a fool.

For now, I think it's a good effort. If there comes a time when moving around in space is more common place then it should be reexamined, but for now with merely un-manned platforms (that could be hacked) I think it's best to keep such things on the ground.

Take for instance Princess Diane; she fought against land mines and see where that went? ... she didn't live to see it to fruition, but it was noble cause.

... does that mean I'm calling Obama noble?? ...hmmm >_>

lol
User avatar
Will Robinson
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10124
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am

Re: Obama and his space weapons ban

Post by Will Robinson »

Gooberman wrote:...
The problem with weaponizing space for national defense, is no other country in the world views that as "defense!"

If we do it, others will follow suit, in the name of "defense." And what then?...
The problem with your theory is you assume no other country see's it as defense but they won't do it unless we do!!
Of course they understand the offensive capability of weaponizing space and that is why they won't hesitate to establish a military capability there regardless of whether we do it or not!!
Duper wrote:I thought Carter was first to bring this up in the SALT treaties. .. then Reagan usurped that. You know.. Carter, the guy you called a fool.
Actually it was Nixon's baby and Carter inherited it and now Obama has the opportunity to be just as foolish as Carter was in buying into the notion that 'only if the U.S. provokes these enemies will they do bad things...'

The agreement Carter had handed to him wasn't ratified because the USSR didn't live up to it and they invaded Afghanistan and were getting heavy handed in Cuba/South America.
As I recall Reagan's position served us well and I can't find the same results coming from Carter. Carters biggest impact on foreign affairs was acting on the advice of his national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski arming of the mujaheddin in Afghanistan which directly led to the creation of al Queda!! Granted Reagan nor Bush Sr. or even Clinton did anything to change things in Afghanistan after the fact but Carter boldly cracked open that Pandoras box for us all.
Gooberman
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 6155
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 1999 3:01 am
Location: tempe Az

Post by Gooberman »

Will wrote:The problem with your theory is you assume no other country see's it as defense but they won't do it unless we do!!
The problem is I know they will do it if we do! Right now every country gets to say that.

I am sure DARPA funds research in this area, and I am sure we will be ready if need be.

I just don't think we should be the first ones to take our guns out of their holsters in a time of relative peace. Especially after we just scared the crap out of the world with this preemptive war stuff. Pretend you are not an American for one second.
User avatar
woodchip
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
Posts: 17865
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 1999 2:01 am

Post by woodchip »

Ummm, Goob? Wasn't it the Chi-Coms that were the first and only country to actually shoot a satellite? With the great dependence our military has on space based guidance and communication system, I would think we would want to be able to protect them.
User avatar
Kilarin
DBB Fleet Admiral
DBB Fleet Admiral
Posts: 2403
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 2:01 am
Location: South of Ft. Worth Texas

Post by Kilarin »

Whoever is at the top of the gravity well wins. period. You don't want to be in a rock throwing contest and be throwing rocks UP at the people on top of the cliff. You don't want to be standing under the cliff where the guys with the rocks are. You want to be on top of the highest cliff with your own piles of rocks.

If Iran wanted to actually have a CHANCE to whoop the rest of the world, all they need to do is build a peaceful space program. Launch some communication satellites, and then, one day, suddenly launch a thor system instead.

If we don't own space, whoever does will own us.
User avatar
Spidey
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10798
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Earth

Re:

Post by Spidey »

woodchip wrote:Ummm, Goob? Wasn't it the Chi-Coms that were the first and only country to actually shoot a satellite? With the great dependence our military has on space based guidance and communication system, I would think we would want to be able to protect them.
Ehhh…didn’t we blow one up under the guise of preventing the radioactive crap from returning?
User avatar
woodchip
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
Posts: 17865
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 1999 2:01 am

Post by woodchip »

I think you are right Spidey. Question is, who did it first so the other side can say, \"We didn't start it\".
Gooberman
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 6155
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 1999 3:01 am
Location: tempe Az

Post by Gooberman »

This example you gave is right where I think we should be. We should have the capability, but not demonstrate it without need.

It goes to the heart of that saying...

We should fund the stick, we should research the stick, we should develop the stick.....

...But I don't see why at this point in time we need to....quite literally....be waving it above our heads.
User avatar
Dakatsu
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1575
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:22 am
Location: St. Petersburg, Florida

Re:

Post by Dakatsu »

It's one thing if we put like, SDI up in space. I would consider that a passive defense. It's when we do crap like placing a GDI Ion Cannon floating around ready to blast on command that we make a LOT more enemies, and incredibly weird looks from our allies. We have barely used space for civilian purposes, let alone any need for military weapons floating around.

I find it inevitable that in the future, when we do have other planets colonized, that space weapons will be common. But I think while everyone is on the ground, we shouldn't be the first to weaponize space. If we do it, hell, everyone else will think they can too!

We should be able to shoot satellites out of the sky from the ground though, in case someone else places space weapons up there and decides to use them.
User avatar
Spidey
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10798
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Earth

Post by Spidey »

If I put a weapon platform in space, I sure as hell wouldn’t let you shoot it down with some ground based missile.
User avatar
Dakatsu
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1575
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:22 am
Location: St. Petersburg, Florida

Re:

Post by Dakatsu »

Spidey wrote:If I put a weapon platform in space, I sure as hell wouldn’t let you shoot it down with some ground based missle.
Tell that to Mr. Missile :P
User avatar
Kilarin
DBB Fleet Admiral
DBB Fleet Admiral
Posts: 2403
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 2:01 am
Location: South of Ft. Worth Texas

Post by Kilarin »

Dakatsu wrote:Tell that to Mr. Missile
Tell Mr. Very Expensive and Complex Missile climbing slowly up the gravity well to meet Mr. Cheap and Simple Slug, fired at high velocity DOWN the gravity well.

Bye Bye Mr. Missile!

Seriously, if you aren't at the top of the gravity well, your chances are slim. The first country to seriously weaponize space will be very, VERY difficult to dislodge. If they've done it right, virtually impossible.
User avatar
Neo
DBB Captain
DBB Captain
Posts: 990
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:03 am

Post by Neo »

Obi-Wan wrote:It's over, Anakin! I got the high ground!

....don't try it!
^_~
User avatar
Kilarin
DBB Fleet Admiral
DBB Fleet Admiral
Posts: 2403
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 2:01 am
Location: South of Ft. Worth Texas

Post by Kilarin »

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090203/ap_ ... iran_space

Iran has the ability to put something in orbit. This is a LOT scarier than any nuclear program.
User avatar
flip
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:13 am

Post by flip »

Yeah I think Iran is a perfect candidate for a spawn kill >:).
User avatar
Pandora
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1715
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Bangor, Wales, UK.

Post by Pandora »

ROFL
that was hilarious (although spawn kills are unethical, of course :wink:)
Post Reply