Interesting article about copyright laws, the internet and government intrusion upon privacy.
--------------------------------------------------
Copyright laws threaten our online freedom
By Christian Engström
Published: July 7 2009 18:10 | Last updated: July 7 2009 18:10
If you search for Elvis Presley in Wikipedia, you will find a lot of text and a few pictures that have been cleared for distribution. But you will find no music and no film clips, due to copyright restrictions. What we think of as our common cultural heritage is not “ours” at all.
On MySpace and YouTube, creative people post audio and video remixes for others to enjoy, until they are replaced by take-down notices handed out by big film and record companies. Technology opens up possibilities; copyright law shuts them down.
This was never the intent. Copyright was meant to encourage culture, not restrict it. This is reason enough for reform. But the current regime has even more damaging effects. In order to uphold copyright laws, governments are beginning to restrict our right to communicate with each other in private, without being monitored.
File-sharing occurs whenever one individual sends a file to another. The only way to even try to limit this process is to monitor all communication between ordinary people. Despite the crackdown on Napster, Kazaa and other peer-to-peer services over the past decade, the volume of file-sharing has grown exponentially. Even if the authorities closed down all other possibilities, people could still send copyrighted files as attachments to e-mails or through private networks. If people start doing that, should we give the government the right to monitor all mail and all encrypted networks? Whenever there are ways of communicating in private, they will be used to share copyrighted material. If you want to stop people doing this, you must remove the right to communicate in private. There is no other option. Society has to make a choice.
The world is at a crossroads. The internet and new information technologies are so powerful that no matter what we do, society will change. But the direction has not been decided.
The technology could be used to create a Big Brother society beyond our nightmares, where governments and corporations monitor every detail of our lives. In the former East Germany, the government needed tens of thousands of employees to keep track of the citizens using typewriters, pencils and index cards. Today a computer can do the same thing a million times faster, at the push of a button. There are many politicians who want to push that button.
The same technology could instead be used to create a society that embraces spontaneity, collaboration and diversity. Where the citizens are no longer passive consumers being fed information and culture through one-way media, but are instead active participants collaborating on a journey into the future.
The internet it still in its infancy, but already we see fantastic things appearing as if by magic. Take Linux, the free computer operating system, or Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Witness the participatory culture of MySpace and YouTube, or the growth of the Pirate Bay, which makes the world’s culture easily available to anybody with an internet connection. But where technology opens up new possibilities, our intellectual property laws do their best to restrict them. Linux is held back by patents, the rest of the examples by copyright.
The public increasingly recognises the need for reform. That was why Piratpartiet – the Pirate party – won 7.1 per cent of the popular vote in Sweden in the European Union elections. This gave us a seat in the European parliament for the first time.
Our manifesto is to reform copyright laws and gradually abolish the patent system. We oppose mass surveillance and censorship on the net, as in the rest of society. We want to make the EU more democratic and transparent. This is our entire platform.
We intend to devote all our time and energy to protecting the fundamental civil liberties on the net and elsewhere. Seven per cent of Swedish voters agreed with us that it makes sense to put other political differences aside in order to ensure this.
Political decisions taken over the next five years are likely to set the course we take into the information society, and will affect the lives of millions for many years into the future. Will we let our fears lead us towards a dystopian Big Brother state, or will we have the courage and wisdom to choose an exciting future in a free and open society?
The information revolution is happening here and now. It is up to us to decide what future we want.
The writer is the Pirate party’s member of the European parliament.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/87c523a4-6b18 ... abdc0.html
-----------------------------------------------------
Vive le revolucion!
Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250
-
Nightshade
- DBB Master
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Planet Earth, USA
- Contact:
Vive le revolucion!
.
"Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun" - Mao Zedong
"Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun" - Mao Zedong
-
Tunnelcat
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 13743
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:32 pm
- Location: Pacific Northwest, U.S.A.
Copyright laws have gotten WAY to draconian. Fair use is almost impossible anymore without the threat of lawsuits for infringement of use. Over 200 years ago, copyrights and patents only lasted for a short set number of years, then they entered the domain of public fair use. However, the length of time that copyrights are in force have been constantly creeping up in steps thanks to a series of Congressional Acts.
By the way, you can thank Disney and Sonny Bono for extending copyright terms even MORE in 1998!
Mickey Mouse Protection Act
By the way, you can thank Disney and Sonny Bono for extending copyright terms even MORE in 1998!
Mickey Mouse Protection Act
But,
On the other hand,
People have a right to be paid for their ideas.
What really gets me riled up, more than copyright law & how it's really easy to violate it these days, is companies trying to figure ways to get around the GNU General Public License and make money off publicly available open source code.
On the other hand,
People have a right to be paid for their ideas.
What really gets me riled up, more than copyright law & how it's really easy to violate it these days, is companies trying to figure ways to get around the GNU General Public License and make money off publicly available open source code.
When the thieves, think they’re being screwed, there is definitely something wrong. 
“If you search for Elvis Presley in Wikipedia, you will find a lot of text and a few pictures that have been cleared for distribution. But you will find no music and no film clips, due to copyright restrictions. What we think of as our common cultural heritage is not “ours” at all.”
No it’s not “ours”, where’s my violin.
“If you search for Elvis Presley in Wikipedia, you will find a lot of text and a few pictures that have been cleared for distribution. But you will find no music and no film clips, due to copyright restrictions. What we think of as our common cultural heritage is not “ours” at all.”
No it’s not “ours”, where’s my violin.
-
Nightshade
- DBB Master
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Planet Earth, USA
- Contact:
Yeah alot of people don't realize that about a socialist or fascist type government. When the Berlin wall came down, the people from East Berlin were shocked at all the pornography shops, liquor stores and open prostitution that existed in the west. Now I'm not here openly promoting that kind of behavior, but I'm of the mind if it doesn't hurt someone else, it's a private matter between them and God. My point is that in all examples of socialism,fascism...etc, the government becomes the moral authority. In all cases this ends up being totally oppressive and taken to extremes. On this very day, someone is being beheaded or openly beat and humiliated for committing moral crimes. Now if we continue to adopt everyone else's ideals and losing the ones this country was founded on, how long will it be before we're hanging people or burning them at the stake again?
Here's the thing I see. I blame it all on the early church. Here they are telling everyone they are the authority of God on earth. Even above the secular Roman government itself, and yet they don't know the world is round. Not only that, they go about killing people who dispute it, because if the world really is round, then it seems God would have told them that right? So we get the Illuminati and those types of groups, at first the good guys, because the church is corrupt. Now these same types of people have gotten power and realized they could be as powerful as the church once was.
BUT
Don't think for a minute that there will not be a new grand unified government sponsored church. The superstitions of people demand it whether God exists or not, and what it decides is moral and good will be thrust upon all.
Here's the thing I see. I blame it all on the early church. Here they are telling everyone they are the authority of God on earth. Even above the secular Roman government itself, and yet they don't know the world is round. Not only that, they go about killing people who dispute it, because if the world really is round, then it seems God would have told them that right? So we get the Illuminati and those types of groups, at first the good guys, because the church is corrupt. Now these same types of people have gotten power and realized they could be as powerful as the church once was.
BUT
Don't think for a minute that there will not be a new grand unified government sponsored church. The superstitions of people demand it whether God exists or not, and what it decides is moral and good will be thrust upon all.