NTFS vs FAT32

For system help, all hardware / software topics NOTE: use Coders Corner for all coders topics.

Moderators: Krom, Grendel

Post Reply
User avatar
Red_5
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:59 pm
Location: Twitter.com/Defend_America
Contact:

NTFS vs FAT32

Post by Red_5 »

Here it comes again, the decision of what to format my new 8GB Sandisk flash drive too... FAT32 or NTFS?

Which is better? What's the difference? Pros and cons?

Thanks for taking the time to help a noooooob.

Apologies to all
User avatar
Isaac
DBB Artist
DBB Artist
Posts: 7737
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:47 am
Location: 🍕

Post by Isaac »

I had some jump drives that weren't recognized on some computers using NTFS. So I had to reformat them to FAT32 to work with home, school, and work computers.
User avatar
SuperSheep
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
Posts: 935
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Illinois

Post by SuperSheep »

User avatar
TechPro
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1520
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:51 pm

Post by TechPro »

NTFS is more efficient ... however at 8gb, unless you have a lot of small files on it you won't really lose a lot of space to the inefficiency of FAT32 ... and (IMHO) the multiple platform compatability for FAT32 easily makes up for the inefficiency when you consider the places and times that NTFS can't (or won't) be readable by a system.

I'd go with FAT32.
User avatar
BUBBALOU
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
Posts: 4198
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Dallas Texas USA
Contact:

Post by BUBBALOU »

stick with FAT32 at least until Flash drives start reaching 160GB, then move to another file system

I seem to have a better workout dodging your stupidity than attempting to grasp the weight of your intelligence.
User avatar
Skyalmian
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1723
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 1999 2:01 am
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post by Skyalmian »

If you have any files on the flash drive above 4GB, you need NTFS since FAT32 doesn't allow file sizes larger than that.
User avatar
Kilarin
DBB Fleet Admiral
DBB Fleet Admiral
Posts: 2403
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 2:01 am
Location: South of Ft. Worth Texas

Post by Kilarin »

Linux works fine with NTFS now, so why use FAT32?
User avatar
Canuck
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1345
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2001 2:01 am

Post by Canuck »

Umm as much as I like Linux there ARE other OS's out there. Fat32 allows MAC and Windows machines to share files and is of course recognized by Linux as well.
User avatar
Red_5
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:59 pm
Location: Twitter.com/Defend_America
Contact:

Post by Red_5 »

Alrighy. FATSO32 is my winner. Thanks for the input.
User avatar
Kilarin
DBB Fleet Admiral
DBB Fleet Admiral
Posts: 2403
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 2:01 am
Location: South of Ft. Worth Texas

Post by Kilarin »

Canuck wrote:Umm as much as I like Linux there ARE other OS's out there
What?!?!? :D
User avatar
snoopy
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
Posts: 4435
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 1999 2:01 am

Post by snoopy »

Ext3?
User avatar
Ferno
DBB Commie Anarchist Thug
DBB Commie Anarchist Thug
Posts: 15163
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 1998 3:01 am

Post by Ferno »

not all OS's support EXT3.

Anything under 8gb, format with FAT32.

anything over 8gb, NTFS.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/140365
User avatar
Zantor
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Midwest United States
Contact:

Post by Zantor »

You can get a \"driver\" For ext2 and ext3 for windows, but not everyone's computers will have that, so go for FAT32. It's what I format all my flash storage with.
Post Reply