Any clues as to how big the crowd was?
Do you think this will change any minds in Washington?
Here's what a real politically savvy talking head in the state I reside in thinks.
Apparently the people that attended have no bearing on the debate according to Mr. Zorn. Eric Zorn is one of the lackeys that kowtow to the politically connected Chicagoans that run this state.Eric Zorn wrote: What to make of the big Tea Party rally in D.C.?
Remember when the Iraq War protests stopped the Iraq War? Yeah. Me neither. Nor, for that matter, does Fox News, or Rush Limbaugh, which leaves me a bit confused by their joyous reaction to the Tea Party that took place in Washington on Sunday. Estimates peg it somewhere between 30,000 and 50,000 people, which makes it an admirable bit of organizing, but not a contender for the protest hall of fame... Ezra Kline, Washington Post
Several people have written today triumphantly claiming the crowd in D.C. was actually 2 million people, to why my answer is, as it always is to such protests large and small:
So? Do you think rallies are a better measure of public opinion than scientific polls and election results? And either way, do you expect me to change my mind based on the size of the crowd or the volume with which they speak?
Would you change your mind if an even larger crowd turned out to voice the opposing point of view? Gee, I hope not.
Protests are fine ways of firing up supporters, attracting the curious, motivating the less motivated and so on. I have nothing against them, but they don't prove much to me.
Well I have news for Mr. Zorn, the tea party is to be respected even in this state. Mark my words, heads will roll in this state and every other state that has politicians that refuse to listen to the REAL mandate which is afoot at this time in history.
Pass ONE more bill unread and you are going to be unemployed and NOT very well liked.
http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_co ... in-dc.html