Startrek mistakes (humor)

Duper · Post by **Duper** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:09 pm

the guy disabled comments. meh. humor? it looks like an attempt to punch holes in the NG congruency. (not that that is difficult) but a lot of what is on there is time sensitive.

I'm not a big star trek fan. I grew up with it an I'm rather tired of it. Same with Star Wars. The one thing we learned from star trek is that the space-time continuum is more fragile than a crystal wine glass and can be changed easier than your mamma's mind. (not YOURS personally Issac).

Isaac · Post by **Isaac** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:17 pm

Yeah it is kind of common with tv shows. Especially sci-fi tv shows where realistic (easy to remember) principals/laws are ignored. Stargate SG1 can be pretty bad about that.

Spidey · Post by **Spidey** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:02 pm

Star Trek producers prefer the term “continuity anomalies”…

Tunnelcat · Post by **Tunnelcat** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:21 pm

How about 'temporal causality loops'? They repeat things over and over trying to get it right.

Isaac · Post by **Isaac** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:34 pm

oooooo burn!

Dedman · Post by **Dedman** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:39 pm

I prefer the term \"geeks with way too much effin time on their hands\".

fliptw · Post by **fliptw** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:24 pm

ahh, nitpickers.