The G20 and the Big O

For discussion of life's issues: current events, social trends and personal opinions.

Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250

Post Reply
Dedman
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4513
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Atlanta

The G20 and the Big O

Post by Dedman »

Recently I got into a debate with a guy who thinks Obama should be impeached. When I asked him what crime the President had committe, he said his presidency of the G20 (I think he meant chairmanship but I could be wrong) violated Article 1, Section 9 of The Constitution. I don't see how that article and section applies to Obama's involvement in the G20.

What's your take on it?
Cuda68
DBB Captain
DBB Captain
Posts: 745
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Denver, CO USA
Contact:

Post by Cuda68 »

While he is not who I voted for or even want, he is my president. I don't see where this claim even has merit.
User avatar
dissent
DBB Fleet Admiral
DBB Fleet Admiral
Posts: 2162
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 12:17 pm
Location: Illinois

Post by dissent »

I guess this is what he was referring to -
No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution ... l#section9

Does the chairmanship involve any pay? If not, then I'm not sure I see that there is any case to be made.
User avatar
Sergeant Thorne
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4641
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Indiana, U.S.A.

Post by Sergeant Thorne »

The question is does the G20 chairmanship fall under any of these categories (\"present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever\"), and, if so, has he had the consent of congress? I think that the Nobel Peace Prize falls under at least one of these categories, actually.
User avatar
fliptw
DBB DemiGod
DBB DemiGod
Posts: 6459
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 1998 2:01 am
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada

Post by fliptw »

the chair rotates between countries, IIRC, rather than individuals.
User avatar
flip
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:13 am

Post by flip »

Loophole: The ability to twist and distort a law beyond its original intent. :P Won't find that one on wikipedia. It's a form of flattery and if our president is dumb enough to fall for it, I say you get what you asked for.
User avatar
woodchip
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
Posts: 17865
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 1999 2:01 am

Post by woodchip »

I would be more concerned about the hiring of Czars. While Czars are OK as long as all they do is advise the president, it is not constitutional to grant them any power...as Obama is doing ( as well perhaps other presidents have done } The granting of power to unvetted persons with no approval by the senate or congress may be in fact a impeachable offense.
User avatar
flip
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:13 am

Post by flip »

I'm just gonna start calling Obama, Shambo.
User avatar
Lothar
DBB Ghost Admin
DBB Ghost Admin
Posts: 12133
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
Location: I'm so glad to be home
Contact:

Re:

Post by Lothar »

Sergeant Thorne wrote:The question is does the G20 chairmanship fall under any of these categories ("present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever")
More importantly: was it accepted from a "king, prince, or foreign state"?

The G20 doesn't qualify as any of those, and neither does the Nobel committee. The President can hold all manner of titles from all sorts of organizations (such as Time Magazine's "Person of the Year", as W held in 2004) as long as the organizations are not foreign governments.
Post Reply