Paper Batteries
Paper Batteries
http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/24097/?a=f
Amazing recharge and storage properties. I was reading somewhere else that the system is over 300% better than lithium-ion in storage and cycles far longer.
Amazing recharge and storage properties. I was reading somewhere else that the system is over 300% better than lithium-ion in storage and cycles far longer.
-
- DBB Ace
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:54 pm
- Krom
- DBB Database Master
- Posts: 16135
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
- Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
- Contact:
Dated 2007-08-14: http://www.dailytech.com/Article.aspx?newsid=8442
Dated 2009-12-09: http://www.dailytech.com/Article.aspx?newsid=17070
Dated 2009-12-09: http://www.dailytech.com/Article.aspx?newsid=17070
- [RIP]Machete_Bug
- DBB Ace
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 5:03 pm
- Location: USA
Re:
Heh, slow news time or Stanford is desperate.Krom wrote:Dated 2007-08-14: http://www.dailytech.com/Article.aspx?newsid=8442
Dated 2009-12-09: http://www.dailytech.com/Article.aspx?newsid=17070
If you check the links (non-video) that I posted; the Standford site was posted on the 7th. The last link (which was a link inside the Standford article) was posted ...hm.. /me digs through page source code... looks like Dec 4th. But the article was submitted for review in August.
THIS may be the source document for Krom's first link.
Interesting as there were supposed to be patents filed. ... how is it that Standford is raising the banner on this?
THIS may be the source document for Krom's first link.
Interesting as there were supposed to be patents filed. ... how is it that Standford is raising the banner on this?
-
- DBB Ace
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:54 pm
Re:
I couldn't tell you what article it was off the top of my head, but I might be able to find it.Canuck wrote:S13driftAZ please explain how you read about this "old news" when it was announced last Wednesday? The nano ink used hasn't been around very long... maybe something similar with different materials?
Duper has the correct link... the 2007 technology does not use silver wires, the 2009 does. The 2007 technology cannot be printed yet, 2009 tech is readily printable with current technology. Also 40,000 + charge discharge cycles on the alpha model is impressive. The older article is a more proof of concept article. You can be like , \"bah, that's old\" I myself am impressed and excited.
-
- DBB Ace
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:54 pm
- Krom
- DBB Database Master
- Posts: 16135
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
- Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
- Contact:
Re:
x2Duper wrote:That's awesome Floyd!
I've seen so many "new breakthrough technology blah blah blah will be available in the market in 1-2 years" over the last 10 years, and have yet to see anything actually available as a product.
Well OK, OLEDs are finally starting to show up as actual products in some places but that is different, they have been talking about OLEDs since before I was born.