Draft Yes, Draft No?

For discussion of life's issues: current events, social trends and personal opinions.

Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250

Post Reply
User avatar
Kyouryuu
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 5775
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Isla Nublar
Contact:

Draft Yes, Draft No?

Post by Kyouryuu »

From this site, abridged to cut to the chase.
the article wrote:WASHINGTON -- Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld yesterday said the Pentagon was not considering a return of the military draft and would ease troop shortages related to the war in Iraq and other deployments by turning over to civilians jobs now done by members of the armed forces.

"I don't know anyone in the Executive Branch who thinks it's appropriate or necessary to reinstitute the draft," Rumsfeld told a gathering of newspaper editors and publishers. "We have a large population and a relatively small armed forces," he added, noting that the military draft abolished in 1973 had several problems, including high turnover and a complicated deferment system.

Likening the armed services to a barrel, he said: "We need to lower the spigot. We don't need a bigger barrel." That could be done, he said, by reassigning to civilian employees jobs now performed by 300,000 uniformed men and women.

Rumsfeld's comments came in an answer to a question posed at a luncheon of the Newspaper Association of America and the American Society of Newspaper Editors. They came two days after Republican Sen. Charles Hagel of Nebraska told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the situation in Iraq might necessitate a return to conscription.
Another snippet on the subject.
another article wrote: The issue of the military draft emerged in the major media this week after an independent-minded Republican senator raised it at a committee hearing on Tuesday. As Helen Dewar reported in The Washington Post: "Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.), a Vietnam War veteran and an influential member of the Foreign Relations Committee, wants the United States to consider reviving the draft as part of a broader effort to ensure that all Americans 'bear some responsibility' and 'pay some price' in defending the nation's interests."

Long before that, the question had become a hot one on the Internet, particularly on blogs and Web sites that routinely express great skepticism about the Bush administration. (See, for instance, BuzzFlash.com.)

Here's how Dana Hull of the San Jose Mercury News puts it: "An Internet-driven rumor mill about the possible return of a military draft is forcing Pentagon officials to step up denials that such plans are in the works."
It seems the plans to reopen the draft are overblown. Rather, more like what our right-wing friends have been saying all along - that it's largely the work of one kooky Republican and a few democrats to build a case against Bush's re-election.

More articles can be found on Google with the keyword 'military draft'. Trying just 'draft' gets you all of that NFL nonsense. :P
User avatar
bash
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 5042
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
Location: Texas

Post by bash »

Charles Rangel (D) is where it all got started.

*A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.*
-Winston Churchill
Birdseye
DBB DemiGod
DBB DemiGod
Posts: 3655
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
Location: Oakland, CA

Post by Birdseye »

I agree that the possibility of a draft is tiny. I simply started the thread more as a social inquiry rather than in chicken little anger.
Post Reply