Barbary Jihad
Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250
- Nightshade
- DBB Master
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Planet Earth, USA
- Contact:
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
WELL that explains the battle of Thermoplyae. I thought it was a huge victory for the Greek's over the Persian Immortals. in REALITY, it was just a bunch of women in Burka's
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
― Theodore Roosevelt
― Theodore Roosevelt
TB, that's a horribly slanted slanted image.
Not ALL Muslim women dress that way. That is the most extreme form, yes. But it's not the norm.
.. ans Christians get accused of being lopsided.
with this kind of singular \"Open-mindedness\" and winning attitudes like this:
Not ALL Muslim women dress that way. That is the most extreme form, yes. But it's not the norm.
.. ans Christians get accused of being lopsided.
with this kind of singular \"Open-mindedness\" and winning attitudes like this:
I'm sure this world will go far...I don't respect Islam, i just think it's hypocritical to complain about one stupid religion when there's another stupid religion right in front of you.
I handed an Islamic preacher's ass back to him today - and most of the arguments i used can also be used on Christianity.
The loudest criticism of Islam always seems to come from the Christian right. Competing teams in a sport for retards.
- Krom
- DBB Database Master
- Posts: 16138
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
- Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
- Contact:
Re:
During my trip to Egypt, which is definitely on the tolerant end of the scale of Islam I would say about half the woman were dressed that way. Nobody outside the tour group ever bared a shoulder or a leg, and few left their hair uncovered. Although for the most part you could still see their faces, few had the full veil like that image above. But no matter how you take it the number of people dressed that way was significant.Duper wrote:TB, that's a horribly slanted slanted image.
Not ALL Muslim women dress that way. That is the most extreme form, yes. But it's not the norm.
- Nightshade
- DBB Master
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Planet Earth, USA
- Contact:
- Sergeant Thorne
- DBB Material Defender
- Posts: 4641
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Indiana, U.S.A.
Abraham's wife's burka must have been a lot less ugly, because he was afraid the men of a certain city would kill him for his wife.
Those women look like a bunch of penguins except ugly. No one was meant to dress like that.
Muslim men must have absolutely no balls, or perhaps there is just no reason that their wives should want to stay with them, if they have to resort to hiding their women.
I have one more ridicule to utter. Isn't it amazing that in the service of the one \"true God\" these righteous men, under Islam, all have to hide their wives from each other.
Those women look like a bunch of penguins except ugly. No one was meant to dress like that.
Muslim men must have absolutely no balls, or perhaps there is just no reason that their wives should want to stay with them, if they have to resort to hiding their women.
I have one more ridicule to utter. Isn't it amazing that in the service of the one \"true God\" these righteous men, under Islam, all have to hide their wives from each other.
Bee…
Do you even have half a clue? “Most oppressed society in the history of the world”.
Have you even heard of cultures where they made their women tie their feet so they could remain small or ones that required they get circumcised, then there are the ones that make their women wear rings around their necks to stretch them, and maybe even the ones that throw tires over them and then set them on fire?
Give me a break.
Do you even have half a clue? “Most oppressed society in the history of the world”.
Have you even heard of cultures where they made their women tie their feet so they could remain small or ones that required they get circumcised, then there are the ones that make their women wear rings around their necks to stretch them, and maybe even the ones that throw tires over them and then set them on fire?
Give me a break.
Re:
- Few Muslims want Sharia law.Bet51987 wrote:Because it's not even close to a culture. It's a barbaric form of religious extremism that is forced on girls and women that TB points out very well.Spidey wrote:How does making fun of someone’s culture make any kind of point?
Afghanistan, for example, was the most oppressed society in the history of the world and the "point" is that this is what Sharia law of Islam wants to place on the rest of the world. Burkas for all females.
Bee
- AFAIK Most Muslim women wear the small Hijab head covering, but few wear the full Burqa. Many Muslim women do not wear any headcovering at all.
- For example in Indonesia, the per-capita biggest Muslim country (and right on the doorstep of Australia), the headdress is a fashion accessory, is not required, and many don't wear it.
- Head coverings for women are also an aspect of other religions, such as CHRISTIANITY.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veil
When i was a Fundamentalist Christian a few years back, sometimes women felt they should wear a veil when speaking in church. I saw it with my own eyes.All traditional depictions of the Virgin Mary, the mother of Christ, show her veiled. Veiling was a common practice with church-going women until the 1960s, and a number of very traditional churches retain the custom.
But yeah Authoritorian regimes who require headdresses, are dumb. Authoritarianism in general is dumb.
- Nightshade
- DBB Master
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Planet Earth, USA
- Contact:
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
I find a certain bit of irony in someone that complains about the Christian right \"imposing\" their views on non-believers, wishing to impose their own moralistic views on the people of Afghanistan, your \"ASSUMPTION\" that
is arrogant at best, you couldn't possibly know this to be true, and then to sayno one wants Sharia law and neither did the women of Afghanistan
if that was the case then why do so many Muslim's embrace it Men AND Women.Sharia law should be feared by every Muslim
- Sergeant Thorne
- DBB Material Defender
- Posts: 4641
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Indiana, U.S.A.
The Bible only commands a woman to wear a head covering if she is praying or prophesying (by the same token a man is commanded not to cover his head while praying or prophesying). Some people take that to extremes, and some people try to nullify it with surrounding scripture, but it is in there. But any similarity that Roid is attempting to imply is clearly not there. It's those damn details that gum everything up.Head coverings for women are also an aspect of other religions, such as CHRISTIANITY.
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
Re:
and you've been there and seen it your self right???? then you know NOTHING. reading somone's viewpoint on what goes on over there is just their OPINION of the situation based on what OUR culture considers the norm. unless you have seen it with your own eyes and lived it you cannot possibly know the whole truth. even you cannot POSSIBLY believe that the MILLIONS of women all living under Sharia are living there out of fear.Bet51987 wrote:I have no problem with Christians teaching non-believers as long as it's not in a public school. I do it myself in church when I need to comfort someone but to quote Spidey.... "If you had half a clue" about what those women and girls went through living under Sharia you wouldn't make such a dumb statement. They were forced. Many others "embrace" it out of pure fear.CUDA wrote:I find a certain bit of irony in someone that complains about the Christian right "imposing" their views on non-believers, wishing to impose their own moralistic views on the people of Afghanistan, your "ASSUMPTION" thatis arrogant at best, you couldn't possibly know this to be true, and then to sayno one wants Sharia law and neither did the women of Afghanistanif that was the case then why do so many Muslim's embrace it Men AND Women.Sharia law should be feared by every Muslim
You need to read more about it...like I have.
Bee
Now in your defense I pretty much agree with you on how I think a women should be treated. but your positions of absolutes is foolish. you dont have ANY clue on what those girls and women go through. this is both a religious and a cultural issue. while I have not been to Afghanistan I have been to India and Indonesia and have seen women treated in a way that I would consider wrong, but again that IS their culture.
- Sergeant Thorne
- DBB Material Defender
- Posts: 4641
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Indiana, U.S.A.
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
Re:
Grow up childBet51987 wrote:It means he considers uncivilized barbarism toward women in Afghanistan a culture. I wish I could lower my morals just enough to swear.Sergeant Thorne wrote:Means...?CUDA wrote:but again that IS their culture.
Bee
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
― Theodore Roosevelt
― Theodore Roosevelt
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
Re:
Sergeant Thorne wrote:Means...?CUDA wrote:but again that IS their culture.
cul·ture (kŭl'chər)
n.
The totality of socially transmitted behavior patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought.
- Sergeant Thorne
- DBB Material Defender
- Posts: 4641
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Indiana, U.S.A.
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
Re:
Yep I want all women in Burqa's,Bet51987 wrote: The Taliban surely has a friend in you Cuda. You should be ashamed.
Bee
I see how you conveniently ignored this statement by me
ya see Bee you and the Taliban have so much in common. YOU BOTH HATE, and you both hate completely. if there is anyone here that should be ashamed its you.written by me which you completely ignored wrote:Now in your defense I pretty much agree with you on how I think a women should be treated.
Hate is a disease, it eats at your soul. you hate the Taliban, you hate God, you hate me. how many more people do you hate. its spreading in your life
you can try to make me out for being the bad guy if that makes your feel better.
I already stated that I don't agree with the Taliban here and in other threads, but apparently your Grey matter didn't register that line because you HATE and you want to continue HATING.
you ASSUME that everyone in Afghanistan Men and Women are forced into the Taliban. YOU ARE WRONGas·sume
/əˈsum/ Show Spelled [uh-soom] Show IPA verb,-sumed, -sum·ing.
–verb (used with object)
1.
to take for granted or without proof; suppose; postulate; posit: to assume that everyone wants peace.
EDIT:
the word "shared" as you want to point out means COMMON.Stare at the word "shared" and see if you can understand what it means.
learn english
share1 /ʃɛər/ Show Spelled [shair] Show IPA noun, verb,shared, shar·ing.
Synonyms
mutual
communal
common
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
Re:
Nah I'm just tired of the rantings of a post pubescent girl who's probably never left her home state, assuming she knows about the rest of the world's issues.Sergeant Thorne wrote:If that's the way you want to play.CUDA wrote:you know NOTHING.
...
your positions of absolutes is foolish.
I think CUDA may have a point hidden somewhere in amidst the condescension. Shame.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
― Theodore Roosevelt
― Theodore Roosevelt
- Nightshade
- DBB Master
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Planet Earth, USA
- Contact:
- Tunnelcat
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 13743
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:32 pm
- Location: Pacific Northwest, U.S.A.
Re:
I figured that would happen when I started it. Nothing brings out emotion like a discussion about religion.ThunderBunny wrote:Man, ya'll are gonna lock up TC's thread.
Oh well.
I'm with Bee. I personally think most mainstream religions, including Christianity, but especially Islam, are just an rationale for male dominance and power in this world. And don't go on and claim 'hate' whenever someone disagrees with or 'knocks' a religion and their dogmatic thinking. Those that are in the 'king of the hill' seat, in power so to speak, can't possibly have ANY idea what it's like to be subservient in an oppressive culture, ESPECIALLY when they don't think their culture IS oppressive. For me, Islam, or even Christianity, is NOT something I want fully controlling my life. Practice religion yourself if you want, it's a free country, but don't force it on others that want no part of it.
I just got through reading 'Corsair' and the ending is something we can only hope for, peace between the 2 largest religions. However, I really don't see that ever happening in the near future. Both religions keep returning to their dogma and rigidity in seeking dominance and new members. Compromise between the 2 just seems to be an impossible goal. We can't even get agreement BETWEEN Christian denominations let alone OTHER faiths!