U.S. Military Civil DIsturbance Planning:

For discussion of life's issues: current events, social trends and personal opinions.

Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250

User avatar
Will Robinson
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10135
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am

Re:

Post by Will Robinson »

Bet51987 wrote:
Will Robinson wrote:Lol! Are you suggesting you are just playing and I should take it easy on you because you're just a kid?
Quite the opposite. I don't go after kids and when I saw you make that little comment at the end of your post my mind shifted to a playground and I really didn't know if you were an adult or a kid. No offense taken. :wink:

Bee
maybe my reference was a bit obscure especially for you since you seem to skim and may not connect the dots with my reference. So here's the translation. Obama's agenda for healthcare reform was shoved through by way of a very tainted process but you only care that your guy won. You don't care that by his winning politically your country ultimately will lose. You accept the promises that your friend who needs assistance will now get it yet you can't show me on instance where Obama has delivered on a promise. He tells you his plan costs ten years of taxes to pay for 6 years of coverage therefore he starts the plan in four years...you ignore the discussion where I asked how will he pay for the 11th and following years because even if we accept his budget projections he's starts the 11th year with a 40% shortfall!!
You don't care though because you think you won. there have been numerous other points you completely ignore as well and we both know why...because you have no clue and no care.
You deserve to be taunted for arrogantly defending this plan and brazenly ignoring any rational, logical challenge to it and instead keep spamming the hallway with your fusion blasts of propaganda.
User avatar
Spidey
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10808
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Earth

Re:

Post by Spidey »

Gooberman wrote:
Spidey wrote:So I guess stabbing his environmental supporters in the back, with the announcement that he was going to eliminate part of the moratorium against off shore drilling, was just a joke.
Ya, all the intense conservative hatred for Obama really is a joke. How often did we hear the previous eight year, "The number one issue is the war on terror", well, he has been pretty damn conservative there. "We need to Drill baby Drill", well, he is going to drill more then Bush ever did.

I mean, I agreed with Bush on many of his immigration policies, but in the end he didn't get squat done. Obama is actually advancing significant parts of your agenda, and you guys still wont cut the man a break!
So you admit, Obama lied his way into office, and now he’s just another shill…That’s a good start I guess.

And you are right I do hate Obama, I started hating him that day he pointed his crooked little finger at me and accused an innocent person of being one of the main problems in reguards to the health care crisis.
User avatar
CUDA
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 6482
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon

Post by CUDA »

A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.

Thomas Jefferson
Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.

Thomas Jefferson
here is a very prophetic quote

I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.

Thomas Jefferson
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.” 

― Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Isaac
DBB Artist
DBB Artist
Posts: 7737
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:47 am
Location: 🍕

Re:

Post by Isaac »

Uh... He was against federalism. Wow. That's what you want? The USA to be the European Union or less?

You drive me crazy. You have no idea what you're actually quoting, Cuda.
User avatar
Kilarin
DBB Fleet Admiral
DBB Fleet Admiral
Posts: 2403
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 2:01 am
Location: South of Ft. Worth Texas

Post by Kilarin »

that quote was so incredibly good I looked it up just to ensure it's authenticity.

According to the Jeffersonian Cyclopedia it's legit, it's just been rephrased a bit. The original is:
Thomas Jefferson wrote:If we can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people, under the pretence of taking care of them, they must become happy.
this one goes in the quote file!
User avatar
CUDA
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 6482
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon

Re:

Post by CUDA »

Isaac wrote:Uh... He was against federalism. Wow. That's what you want? The USA to be the European Union or less?

You drive me crazy. You have no idea what you're actually quoting, Cuda.
and exactly how are those quotes not valid to the points I'm trying to make?????
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.” 

― Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Isaac
DBB Artist
DBB Artist
Posts: 7737
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:47 am
Location: 🍕

Post by Isaac »

Sorry, I didn't know you wanted your state to leave the Union. It makes sense now.
User avatar
Will Robinson
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10135
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am

Re:

Post by Will Robinson »

tunnelcat wrote:Will, whether we like it or not, Bush did HIDE his war spending and preceeded to dump it on the next president's watch with an 'it's not my problem' attitude.
First, I didn't vote for Bush in his second term, you voted for Obama and sound like you will again...
so you own his mess more than I own Bush's but I was positive on the war so I'll take that part of his spending even though I'd probably not support it with the benefit of hindsight.

However I find it hard to believe anyone thinks the war spending was secret considering how many times we heard the mainstream media discuss all the wonderful things we could have bought with the money.

As for comparing the war cost to Obamacare etc.
The war cost is finite, in fact I'm pretty sure it is already over with since Obama was going to pull out of Iraq.....right?
When are we scheduled to pull out of Obamacare? Done the math yet comparing the two items?!?
How much is Obamacare x2 (since he lies about the real cost) x infinity? My guess is it's a lot more than the war.

The fact that THIS president is keeping it transparent to the public is at least a GOOD thing! Obama could be just like little Bushie and hide this HUGE cost so that his spending looked far less than it really is!
He is trying to hide it bigtime! And unlike Bush he has the media helping him, they are paying it as much attention as Bee does, so far anyway but I have hope for change in both of them.
User avatar
Bet51987
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 2791
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 6:54 am
Location: USA

Re:

Post by Bet51987 »

.
User avatar
Duper
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 9214
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA

Re:

Post by Duper »

Isaac wrote:Sorry, I didn't know you wanted your state to leave the Union. It makes sense now.
You hate Jefferson, we get that.

Cuda's quotes as well as Kilarin's were valid.
User avatar
Spidey
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10808
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Earth

Post by Spidey »

The war spending was “off budget” not “secret” anyone who didn’t know the cost of the war is well…..blinder than my right eye.

It’s a semantic thing…sorta like “death squads“…errr panels. :wink:
User avatar
Insurrectionist
DBB Captain
DBB Captain
Posts: 557
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:01 am
Location: SE;JHFs
Contact:

Re:

Post by Insurrectionist »

Isaac wrote:That's what you want? The USA to be the European Union or less?.
I don't think he wants that type of government but do you know who does?

Look here and find out
Gooberman
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 6155
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 1999 3:01 am
Location: tempe Az

Re:

Post by Gooberman »

Will Robinson wrote:
More like he's wrapped 50 pounds of ***** in a couple of strips of bacon and you want me to agree he's delivered filet mignon....

... He's proposing a fraction of Bush's proposal. How much he actually does, if any, is yet to be seen so don't give him credit yet because he's been known to promise anything and deliver very little. Vegas called they said they'll take your bet....
For all your criticisms, you do alot more side-stepping and mudslinging then I ever see Bee do.

On the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, we are still there. This is not what the vast majority of liberals want. He is planing to withdraw from Iraq (like Bush was), but no where near as fast as most on the left would like. On Afghanistan he is no where near where most liberals would like him to be.

Regarding "how much he does" on drilling, its a public step in your direction. Did Bush ever accomplish amnesty? Or any Immigration reform? No, not at all.

So rather then continuing to sling the mud, why can't you guys step back, and say, "Hey, I *should* be supporting him on this to help him fend off his base?"

You guys wonder why we criticize Obama so much for trying to be by-partisan. Rooting for Obama last year when he was on his bipartisan reach-across the isle binge was a bit like showing up to a globetrotters game wearing a Washington generals jersey. There is no reasoning with people who can only see things in black and white, good vs. evil. Obama is bad and therefor so is everything he does.

(And you can find threads in this forum that I started when Bush was president saying "This is something I agree with him on." in regards to Amnesty)
User avatar
Top Gun
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 8099
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 3:01 am

Re:

Post by Top Gun »

Duper wrote:
Isaac wrote:Sorry, I didn't know you wanted your state to leave the Union. It makes sense now.
You hate Jefferson, we get that.

Cuda's quotes as well as Kilarin's were valid.
There's a dirty little secret that you and everyone else should know about the Founding Fathers and Framers: they weren't omniscient. They created an absolutely incredible system of government for their time, a system whose core has held up remarkably well over the more than two centuries since its inception, but they had no way of foreseeing exactly how the United States would evolve as a nation over that period of time. To use the example of Jefferson, he foresaw the US as remaining predominantly a nation of agrarian farmers, and his views on the role and limitation of government were formed accordingly. Today, a substantial majority of Americans live in areas defined as "urban," and the rural population will continue to shrink as time passes. We're several times larger by physical size, and many times larger by population, than at the time the Constitution was ratified, and we occupy a completely-different position on the world scale. The advancement of technology alone has necessitated that the government take on a far different role than it had to in a day where it took a week to travel a hundred miles. If Jefferson were alive today, I can guarantee that he would look at the complexities of modern life and (perhaps begrudgingly) admit that his concept of government's role simply wouldn't allow the nation to function properly.

(Also note that, despite Jefferson's views on the limits of executive power, he essentially cast said views aside when he signed the Louisiana Purchase. That bit of pragmatism is something I've always admired about him.)

Look, I'm as big of a fan as the Constitution as it was written as anyone, and I don't in any way support running roughshod over the responsibilities and limitations that it establishes. But at the same time, without the ability to interpret the document and apply it to the circumstances of an ever-changing world, the United States would not have survived as a country through to the present day.

And for those who would continue to espouse a Chicken-Little view of the evil overgrown government trying to control our lives, there's a fantastic post I've run across in the past week that undermines that argument quite nicely:
This morning I was awoken by my alarm clock powered by electricity generated by the public power monopoly regulated by the US Department of Energy.

I then took a shower in the clean water provided by the municipal water utility.

After that, I turned on the TV to one of the FCC regulated channels to see what the National Weather Service of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration determined the weather was going to be like using satellites designed, built, and launched by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. I watched this while eating my breakfast of US Department of Agriculture inspected food and taking the drugs which have been determined as safe by the Food and Drug Administration.

At the appropriate time as regulated by the US Congress and kept accurate by the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the US Naval Observatory, I get into my National Highway Traffic Safety Administration approved automobile and set out to work on the roads built by the local, state, and federal Departments of Transportation, possibly stopping to purchase additional fuel of a quality level determined by the Environmental Protection Agency, using legal tender issued by the Federal Reserve Bank. On the way out the door I deposit any mail I have to be sent out via the US Postal Service and drop the kids off at the public school.

Then, after spending another day not being maimed or killed at work thanks to the workplace regulations imposed by the Department of Labor and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, I drive back to my house which has not burned down in my absence because of the state and local building codes and the fire marshal's inspection, and which has not been plundered of all its valuables thanks to the local police department.

I then log onto the Internet which was developed by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Administration and post on freerepublic and fox news forums about how SOCIALISM in medicine is BAD because the government can't do anything right.
That "control" you're so scared of? It happened decades ago. And last time I checked, we're still here.
User avatar
Will Robinson
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10135
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am

Post by Will Robinson »

Bet51987 wrote:..
In my rant thread I already voiced...to you especially... my displeasure at the way the Democrats made deals. I agree the process was less than steller but I also believe that the republicans would never have signed on to any part of healthcare reform whatsoever. My only hope is that some parts of the bill will get tweaked.
This is probably the single most infuriating thing I find in your position. You just assume that the repub's, who were just as busy trying to craft their version of reform as the dem's were until they were shut out cold, wouldn't have signed on to so many ideas that originated on their side of the isle! All evidence leads me to see that if the dem's hadn't taken advantage of the situation and loaded up so much political crap under the guise of healthcare reform the bill would have passed easily. You refuse to look at the evidence of that, refuse to acknowledge the repub authored most of the good stuff in the bill and instead continue to buy into the partyline polarization scam. You spout off 'party of no' without considering the party you are supporting by doing that is using you to the bone!
Bet51987 wrote:
Will Robinson wrote:You accept the promises that your friend who needs assistance will now get it yet you can't show me on instance where Obama has delivered on a promise.
One??

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... mise-kept/
I should have specified the quality of the deed he promised to keep but didn't so yea, you got me there...he did keep a lot of those trivial campaign debate filler promises....as if the creditcard bill of rights wasn't already in the works and going to happen with or without him and that goes for a lot of the crap on that list. But you are correct he did keep some promises and a few of them are important issues. I'm guilty of hyperbole abuse when I should have been specific pointing out the major campaign promise stuff he lied about to get elected.


Bet51987 wrote:
Will Robinson wrote:He tells you his plan costs ten years of taxes to pay for 6 years of coverage therefore he starts the plan in four years...you ignore the discussion where I asked how will he pay for the 11th and following years because even if we accept his budget projections he's starts the 11th year with a 40% shortfall!!
He will pay for it the same way Bush paid 750 billion dollars...and counting... for his Iraq war which is expected to go beyond a trillion.
The Obamacare debacle will cost the trillion in the first ten years! The comparison is obscene.

If McCain/Palin had won we would've already spent those same billions that we don't have in building up a larger military for a possible war with Iran and North Korea. I can provide links to McCains hawkish stance on those two countries if you wish...

Bee
I didn't want people to vote for them so I don't care what they might have done, I don't offer their election as a hindsight solution. What I hoped for was change I could believe in but instead I got a community organizer in the White House. I voted for Obama in the primary and bailed on him before the general because it was getting obvious what player he was.

The way I see it healthcare reform could have been a glorious victory for the people instead it was a glorious victory for the democrat party which is a real setback for America. The way they did this and the crap they stuffed in it will bring back the repub's you hate and the dirty tricks that you and the media are currently accepting and rationalizing will become part of the status quo going forward only it won't always be your team at the wheel. Unfortunately all of us will always be in the middle of the road as that truck bears down on us....

Thanks for actually engaging in the discussion!
User avatar
Will Robinson
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10135
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am

Re:

Post by Will Robinson »

Gooberman wrote:...
Regarding "how much he does" on drilling, its a public step in your direction. Did Bush ever accomplish amnesty? Or any Immigration reform? No, not at all.

So rather then continuing to sling the mud, why can't you guys step back, and say, "Hey, I *should* be supporting him on this to help him fend off his base?"
I wasn't in favor of amnesty so that doesn't represent a piece of my agenda that Obama is advancing. I am in favor of building the fence but opening the gates....let them in through the front door the way we used to let them sneak in only lets see some I.D. and keep track of who,what,where,why and when. No need to give them instant citizenship (read:vote) just to let them work and live here. they can have a work visa and then apply for citizenship the way my European friends have to do.

back to the drilling, I think drilling is good and to whatever degree he actually does it I'll support him. I hear the wells he wants to open are a small percentage of what Bush wanted to open so I consider it a token political move not a "drill baby drill" move as you suggested. I don't see that as a sidestep.
Gooberman wrote:You guys wonder why we criticize Obama so much for trying to be by-partisan. Rooting for Obama last year when he was on his bipartisan reach-across the isle binge was a bit like showing up to a globetrotters game wearing a Washington generals jersey. There is no reasoning with people who can only see things in black and white, good vs. evil. Obama is bad and therefor so is everything he does...
I don't recall any substantial effort on his part. I remember him characterizing his effort that way but it was quite conditional. He said something like 'Of course I welcome the republicans to bring up a plan but I won't change the plan we have...
Well, bipartisan doesn't mean you get the other side to leave your plan intact and then sign their name to it!
User avatar
Sergeant Thorne
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4641
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Indiana, U.S.A.

Post by Sergeant Thorne »

Gooberman wrote:Obama is bad and therefor so is everything he does.
Who are you talking about?
User avatar
Sergeant Thorne
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4641
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Indiana, U.S.A.

Post by Sergeant Thorne »

Top Gun wrote:There's a dirty little secret that you and everyone else should know about the Founding Fathers and Framers: they weren't omniscient
Right next to the disgusting fact that much of what hey said and did could still very well apply to our time, except that people have become so foolish in their wisdom that they've outgrown such profound thought.
User avatar
Bet51987
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 2791
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 6:54 am
Location: USA

Re:

Post by Bet51987 »

.
User avatar
Sergeant Thorne
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4641
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Indiana, U.S.A.

Post by Sergeant Thorne »

Real cute, Bee. I'm asking for something a little more specific. And maybe I should say, \"who do you think you're talking about?\"
User avatar
CUDA
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 6482
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon

Post by CUDA »

and you people wonder why I poke her in the eye as deep as I can everytime I can. :roll:
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.” 

― Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Stroodles
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 406
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:36 am
Location: Right Behind You

Re:

Post by Stroodles »

Bet51987 wrote:
Sergeant Thorne wrote:
Gooberman wrote:Obama is bad and therefor so is everything he does.
Who are you talking about?
The Get Obama Party

Bee
Please, if you're going to offer something constructive, do so. Far too many of your posts here do nothing but whine about how the G.O.P. and the republican party are so mean to your precious Obama.
Amg! It's on every post and it WON'T GO AWAY!!
User avatar
Kilarin
DBB Fleet Admiral
DBB Fleet Admiral
Posts: 2403
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 2:01 am
Location: South of Ft. Worth Texas

Post by Kilarin »

Bettina wrote:The Get Obama Party
I thought it was kinda funny.
User avatar
Stroodles
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 406
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:36 am
Location: Right Behind You

Re:

Post by Stroodles »

Kilarin wrote:
Bettina wrote:The Get Obama Party
I thought it was kinda funny.
That sort of thing is funny in moderation.
Amg! It's on every post and it WON'T GO AWAY!!
User avatar
Sergeant Thorne
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4641
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Indiana, U.S.A.

Re:

Post by Sergeant Thorne »

Kilarin wrote:
Bettina wrote:The Get Obama Party
I thought it was kinda funny.
Yeah? I'm pretty sure it was kinda tired.
User avatar
Will Robinson
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10135
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am

Re:

Post by Will Robinson »

Kilarin wrote:
Bettina wrote:The Get Obama Party
I thought it was kinda funny.
I did too but I couldn't help wondering if she thought it was.
User avatar
AlphaDoG
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Vernon Illinois

Re:

Post by AlphaDoG »

Bet51987 wrote:
Sergeant Thorne wrote:
Gooberman wrote:Obama is bad and therefor so is everything he does.
Who are you talking about?
The Get Obama Party

Bee

ZOmG!
NY Times wrote: We all know that people running for office make promises that they either cannot or will not fulfill when in office, and it’s hard to accuse them of hypocrisy when they yield to political realities. Thus candidate Barack Obama promised to quickly close the interrogation centers at Guanatánamo Bay, but President Obama, facing an attack of Nimbyism and not wanting to open himself to charges of being soft on terrorism, has done little other than waving goodbye to the adviser who pushed him most vehemently on the subject. And the candidate Obama who ridiculed candidate Hillary Clinton’s insistence than health care reform would require a mandate that people buy policies became the President Obama who realized that his plan wouldn’t work without it.

The Obama administration is proposing to open vast expanses of water along the Atlantic coastline, the eastern Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas drilling, much of it for the first time …

“I don’t understand this at all,” echoes Matthew Yglesias at ThinkProgress. “Increased coastal drilling would be a small price to pay in exchange for actual congressional votes for an overall energy package that shifts us to a low-carbon economy over time. But any price is too high a price to pay in exchange for nothing at all. This isn’t the greatest environmental crime in human history, but it sure does seem like poor legislative strategy.”

Obama preempts the other side’s most resonant arguments, which forces them to come up with more and more extreme claims in order to differentiate themselves. In the end, he occupies the reasonable middle ground and his opponents are Palinized. … At the same time, the policy is a tailored, measured version of what the Republicans have urged — so, yes, the headline is, ‘Obama Allows New Offshore Drilling/Presses For Energy Independence,’ but at the same time, California/Oregon/Washington where opposition is strongest isn’t included, and there are environmentally-friendly changes to Alaska leasing policy announced at the same time. …

Finally, by announcing the drilling policy without seeking to extract concessions, the Administration makes clear that it is their policy and they are the centrist/flexible/pragmatic ones — making it harder for Republicans to argue that they accomplished this or that they forced Obama to do it.

YOUR Prsident, is being forced by outside influences to give up the "fundamental transformation" BS, and to conform to global "standards!"



I got my tin hat, you got yours? :P
It's never good to wake up in the shrubs naked, you either got way too drunk, or your azz is a werewolf.

Image
User avatar
Spidey
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10808
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Earth

Post by Spidey »

That NY Times quote just about sums up politics in America…It’s not about governing, it’s about which party has the better tricks.
User avatar
Duper
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 9214
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA

Re:

Post by Duper »

AlphaDoG wrote: I got my tin hat, you got yours? :P

Tin? FAIL!

ALUMINUMUM!

;)
User avatar
Spidey
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10808
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Earth

Re:

Post by Spidey »

Duper wrote:
AlphaDoG wrote: I got my tin hat, you got yours? :P

Tin? FAIL!

ALUMINUMUM!

;)
Lol, that spelling is even funnier than the way they pronounce aluminum in England.
The_Traveler
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 5:53 pm

Post by The_Traveler »

User avatar
flip
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:13 am

Post by flip »

Hope it's better than the plan they had for Louisiana.
User avatar
AlphaDoG
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Vernon Illinois

Re:

Post by AlphaDoG »

flip wrote:Hope it's better than the plan they had for Louisiana.
Trust me it's better, well thought out, and waiting for just the right (notice I didn't say left) crisis that in Rahm Emanuals' word the administration just can't waste.
It's never good to wake up in the shrubs naked, you either got way too drunk, or your azz is a werewolf.

Image
User avatar
Will Robinson
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10135
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am

Post by Will Robinson »

Ok, so regarding this hypothetical nuking of Washington D.C. I need to know if Congress is in session during the attack before I can decide what kind of beverage to use for my celebration....
The_Traveler
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 5:53 pm

Re:

Post by The_Traveler »

Will Robinson wrote:Ok, so regarding this hypothetical nuking of Washington D.C. I need to know if Congress is in session during the attack before I can decide what kind of beverage to use for my celebration....
What if it was during the state of the union address? Who would step up and take control then? It would wipe out the whole entire leadership of the US.
User avatar
Will Robinson
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10135
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am

Re:

Post by Will Robinson »

The_Traveler wrote:...
What if it was during the state of the union address? Who would step up and take control then? It would wipe out the whole entire leadership of the US.
I can only dream!
The two party's and the process they created to self perpetuate sucked the life out of leadership long ago.
If only we could get the innocent attendee's to take a short vacation on that night the event would would rival divine intervention of the highest order!
User avatar
woodchip
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
Posts: 17865
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 1999 2:01 am

Post by woodchip »

Let me understand \"Kow Tow Bow Wow\" Obama's great nuke plan is to not retaliate with nuke against another country if we are struck first. Yet he then goes on to say if AQ hits us with a nuke we would respond by using nukes. I know Obama is a Harvard grad and all, but just where would Hizzoner lay the smack down at? Last time I checked AQ is not a sovereign government controlling any particular country. If the rest of Obama's civil preparedness is this good, heaven help us all
Heretic
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1449
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 6:54 pm
Location: Why no Krom I didn't know you can have 100 characters in this box.

Post by Heretic »

Seem the National Guard is needed in IL for the crime wave in Chicago. Could this be the start of the Military crack down? Look who is behind the call for the guard. Democrats John Fritchey and LaShawn Ford. Why would anyone want the guard to do the work of the police. Why not just let the citizens have their fire arms back to protect themselves. Every one knows about the Chicago ordinance banning handguns and assault weapons. That just doesn't stop the killings of the citizens by criminals with handguns does it. Pat Quinn another democrat is resisting the call for the guard. Seems like a level headed democrat can be found. Wait he is only resisting because Mayor Richard Daley another democrat hasn't said he wants them yet. This isn't going end well for the freedom of the people in Chicago.
Post Reply