New linux chrome version!

For system help, all hardware / software topics NOTE: use Coders Corner for all coders topics.

Moderators: Krom, Grendel

Post Reply
User avatar
Isaac
DBB Artist
DBB Artist
Posts: 7737
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:47 am
Location: 🍕

New linux chrome version!

Post by Isaac »

6.0.472.53 is epic! I love it!
User avatar
Xamindar
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1498
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 2:44 am
Location: California
Contact:

Post by Xamindar »

It's that good? Did they finally do away with the custom borders? Chrome is the only application I have that has the close button in the top right instead of the top left and it is missing the sticky and set above icons that everything else on my system has.
Why doesn't it work?
User avatar
Isaac
DBB Artist
DBB Artist
Posts: 7737
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:47 am
Location: 🍕

Post by Isaac »

This version puts the close/min/max buttons on the left.
User avatar
Xamindar
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1498
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 2:44 am
Location: California
Contact:

Re:

Post by Xamindar »

Isaac wrote:This version puts the close/min/max buttons on the left.
Oh haha, nevermind. There is a setting in options to use system title bar and borders or to hide it. Strange chromium has that option when there are many other options that seem far more important to include.

I find myself using chromium more often now. Firefox is really lagging behind the html5 stuff. Hurry up with firefox 4! :x
Why doesn't it work?
User avatar
Isaac
DBB Artist
DBB Artist
Posts: 7737
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:47 am
Location: 🍕

Post by Isaac »

No no no, look:

Image
That's Chrome's regular title bar and boarder. It now pays attention to what side the icons are on my system boarders.

I've never used the original Chromium. I might try it out if you like it.
User avatar
Xamindar
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1498
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 2:44 am
Location: California
Contact:

Post by Xamindar »

Weird, is that on Ubuntu or Windows? If Ubuntu, it is probably specially modified for Ubuntu. They do that with several programs to make them fit the themes better.

Image

That is the Chromium border on this system, Arch Linux. Looks the same it always has.
User avatar
Isaac
DBB Artist
DBB Artist
Posts: 7737
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:47 am
Location: 🍕

Post by Isaac »

It's in ubuntu but this didn't come from the ubuntu repos. The update was delivered through the Google software source. Judging from the URL (it says Linux not Ubuntu) I'd say it's for all Linux users.
Image
User avatar
snoopy
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
Posts: 4435
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 1999 2:01 am

Post by snoopy »

It looks like it respects the WM's requests, which is how it should be.

Doesn't goggle spy on you through chrome? I've been tempted to try it, but I also like what's left of my privacy.
User avatar
Isaac
DBB Artist
DBB Artist
Posts: 7737
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:47 am
Location: 🍕

Re:

Post by Isaac »

snoopy wrote:Doesn't goggle spy on you through chrome? I've been tempted to try it, but I also like what's left of my privacy.
I understand the economics behind it and feel it's worth the service. As for spying on me I think it's ok, because nothing I do is illegal or embarrassing. I don't mind being studied for more accurate marketing, which is also something I want.

edit:

I also allow Ubuntu to send reports about my activities for the same reason.

price/value

edit:
Wait, goggle? :?
User avatar
Xamindar
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1498
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 2:44 am
Location: California
Contact:

Re:

Post by Xamindar »

snoopy wrote:It looks like it respects the WM's requests, which is how it should be.
I guess it can't respect emerald because you can pretty much put any title button where ever you want with it. :lol: But at least I found the "off" button.
Why doesn't it work?
User avatar
Xamindar
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1498
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 2:44 am
Location: California
Contact:

Re:

Post by Xamindar »

Isaac wrote:As for spying on me I think it's ok, because nothing I do is illegal or embarrassing. I don't mind being studied for more accurate marketing, which is also something I want.
Can I install a camera in your living room? I know you don't do anything illegal so it should be no problem.

Seriously though, that is one reason I don't use Chrome that much. Plus it doesn't have the amazing library of addons that Firefox does. I understand Google's main revenue stream is advertising and that's fine. But I do not like being advertised to every second of the day so I have adblock installed in Firefox. People may complain that I am refusing revenue to websites that rely on the adds, but I say it doesn't matter anyway because I am not going to click on the adds if they were there.
Why doesn't it work?
User avatar
Sirius
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 5616
Joined: Fri May 28, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Bellevue, WA
Contact:

Re:

Post by Sirius »

Xamindar wrote:Hurry up with firefox 4! :x
Agreed. Heard good things about it but 3.x isn't looking so awesome any more. :(

But I believe in the revolution so I'm not going to switch. ;)
User avatar
Thenior
DBB Captain
DBB Captain
Posts: 667
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 9:40 am

Post by Thenior »

I switched to Chrome just because the browser itself loads faster than FF.

And who cars about google ads? Most people are so used to seeing them, they just glaze over on them.
User avatar
Isaac
DBB Artist
DBB Artist
Posts: 7737
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:47 am
Location: 🍕

Re:

Post by Isaac »

Xamindar wrote:Can I install a camera in your living room? I know you don't do anything illegal so it should be no problem.
Sure you can, but you'll be the one who's sorry. Heck, put one in every room! :P I save energy by not running the AC so cloths are optional. :o

edit:

As far as plugins on chrome go, I'd rather have a website that works correctly, which can be a javascript web-app, over a browser that has lots of pluggins. Chrome just runs javascript better than Firefox 3 can, at the moment. And also I mostly use Google web apps so Chrome is the best choice for me.
Post Reply