Moral equivalence and \"islamophobia\"
Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250
- Tunnelcat
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 13743
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:32 pm
- Location: Pacific Northwest, U.S.A.
Along the lines of this thread. What should we be teaching about religions other than Christianity in public schools? Nothing about Islam in Texas schools it seems.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100924/ap_ ... tion_islam
I guess if children don't learn about that nasty Islam, then they'll turn into nice little loving Christians. Out of sight, out of mind and ignorant because they learned nothing.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100924/ap_ ... tion_islam
I guess if children don't learn about that nasty Islam, then they'll turn into nice little loving Christians. Out of sight, out of mind and ignorant because they learned nothing.
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
so your saying you want to teach about Islam in public schools???
well you didn't learn about Islam in school and your not a \"Nice little loving Christian\" so I guess that shoots that argument in the foot doesn't it?I guess if children don't learn about that nasty Islam, then they'll turn into nice little loving Christians.
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
Re:
NO praying to Christ is OK but not if your a PoliticianAlphaDoG wrote:Ok so it's ok to teach Islam. Hold on my head is spinning, but yet, praying to Christ, is not ok?
Holy Smokes.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
― Theodore Roosevelt
― Theodore Roosevelt
Re:
Who was talking about praying? If a history class ignores a major religion practiced by a billion people today that's had a massive influence on world events, there's sort of a problem with said class. It'd be the same if the curriculum downplayed Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, or Hinduism.AlphaDoG wrote:Ok so it's ok to teach Islam. Hold on my head is spinning, but yet, praying to Christ, is not ok?
Holy Smokes.
- Will Robinson
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 10136
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am
Re:
you are correct. How do you feel about removing the mention from the history books that the terrorists that attacked America were radical Islamists?Top Gun wrote:Who was talking about praying? If a history class ignores a major religion practiced by a billion people today that's had a massive influence on world events, there's sort of a problem with said class. It'd be the same if the curriculum downplayed Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, or Hinduism.AlphaDoG wrote:Ok so it's ok to teach Islam. Hold on my head is spinning, but yet, praying to Christ, is not ok?
Holy Smokes.
Re:
I think it's more important to mention that they were Saudi nationals, to be honest.Will Robinson wrote:you are correct. How do you feel about removing the mention from the history books that the terrorists that attacked America were radical Islamists?Top Gun wrote:Who was talking about praying? If a history class ignores a major religion practiced by a billion people today that's had a massive influence on world events, there's sort of a problem with said class. It'd be the same if the curriculum downplayed Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, or Hinduism.AlphaDoG wrote:Ok so it's ok to teach Islam. Hold on my head is spinning, but yet, praying to Christ, is not ok?
Holy Smokes.
Re:
Okay, and everyone else was Saudi.Heretic wrote:Mohamed Mohamed el-Amir Awad el-Sayed Atta Was Egyptian, Ziad Jarrah was Lebanese. Marwan al-Shehhi and Fayez Banihammad were from the United Arab Emirates.
But actually, I think it would be better to paint these guys as radicals, extremists, or just plain crazy people.
- Will Robinson
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 10136
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am
Re:
That is such a stupid line of pure rhetoric. As was pointed out they were not all Saudi's. The democrats liked that fabricated talking point when Bush was in because he had extended his hand to the Saudi's so it made stupid or ignorant voters think the administration was chasing the wrong snake down the wrong hole.null0010 wrote:I think it's more important to mention that they were Saudi nationals, to be honest.Will Robinson wrote:you are correct. How do you feel about removing the mention from the history books that the terrorists that attacked America were radical Islamists?Top Gun wrote:Who was talking about praying? If a history class ignores a major religion practiced by a billion people today that's had a massive influence on world events, there's sort of a problem with said class. It'd be the same if the curriculum downplayed Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, or Hinduism.AlphaDoG wrote:Ok so it's ok to teach Islam. Hold on my head is spinning, but yet, praying to Christ, is not ok?
Holy Smokes.
We don't have to follow the party line talking points do we?
As an example, Muhammed Atta was Egyptian and he was no radical until he attended the Al Quds mosque in Hamburg Germany where he was radicalized from a scared little engineering student into a pilot and leader of the 9/11 attack. Saudi Arabia had no impact on his choices, same with the home country of many of the others. Radical Islam had EVERYTHING to do with it in EVERY one of the choices made by EVERY member of the attack. But they don't even want that important part mentioned in the history books and I don't see anyone raising outrage over the publishers having Muslims cause that ommision from the school books.