DOJ inconsistencies

For discussion of life's issues: current events, social trends and personal opinions.

Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250

Post Reply
User avatar
AlphaDoG
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Vernon Illinois

DOJ inconsistencies

Post by AlphaDoG »

We all know the Justice Dept. refuses to prosecute illegal immigrants right? However they now say that even if the people of the state of California vote to legalize pot, they intend on pursuing the prosecution of individuals smoking and possessing weed in federal court.

What hypocrisy!
It's never good to wake up in the shrubs naked, you either got way too drunk, or your azz is a werewolf.

Image
User avatar
flip
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:13 am

Post by flip »

Na it's not hypocrisy, it's greed. They make tons of money putting away drug users. They finance their whole operation and buy all their equipment that way. No way their gonna just easily let go of that cash cow. I hope and pray for the day I can grow me 5-6 marijuana plants and sit on my front porch and get high without fear of reprisal. I'd start back smoking the minute that happens or all my kids move away, which ever comes first :).

EDIT:Na I wouldn't start back smoking, I'd buy me one of those vaporizers instead >:)
User avatar
null0010
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1447
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:29 am

Post by null0010 »

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/2 ... 83432.html
article wrote:During fiscal year 2009, the first fiscal year of the Obama era, 387,790 immigrants were deported -- almost 100,000 more during the last full fiscal year of the Bush presidency.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/201 ... -than-bush
article wrote:What's changed has been the mix of deportations. The Bush Administration did more work-site raids with many of the illegal immigrants rounded up in those raids being deported.

The Obama Administration has focused more on deporting illegal immigrants with criminal histories, especially violent ones. The Bush administration also went after criminals illegally in the U.S. but under Obama that has been ratcheted up.
http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2010/05/20-11
article wrote:According to Frank Sharry, Executive Director of America's Voice, "As the chart * shows, the Obama administration is on track to deport a record 400,000 people in 2010, 70% of whom are non-criminal undocumented immigrants who have been caught up in an aggressive dragnet of local, state and federal raids and enforcement actions. As shocking as these numbers are, they are proof that Republican calls for increased immigration enforcement as a pretext to comprehensive immigration reform are just hollow political pot shots."
Image
*(click to enlarge)
User avatar
Bet51987
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 2791
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 6:54 am
Location: USA

Post by Bet51987 »

.
User avatar
null0010
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1447
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:29 am

Post by null0010 »

Well, in that case, here's Bill O'Reilly doing a segment on it. Also little green footballs for good measure.
User avatar
AlphaDoG
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Vernon Illinois

Post by AlphaDoG »

Ok then how about the inconsistencies concerning the New Black Panther Party?
It's never good to wake up in the shrubs naked, you either got way too drunk, or your azz is a werewolf.

Image
User avatar
Will Robinson
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10136
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am

Re:

Post by Will Robinson »

AlphaDoG wrote:Ok then how about the inconsistencies concerning the New Black Panther Party?
It's not possible for a black person to violate the civil rights of a white person according to the Obama Justice Dept. so they aren't inconsistent they are just racists.
User avatar
null0010
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1447
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:29 am

Re:

Post by null0010 »

Will Robinson wrote:
AlphaDoG wrote:Ok then how about the inconsistencies concerning the New Black Panther Party?
It's not possible for a black person to violate the civil rights of a white person according to the Obama Justice Dept. so they aren't inconsistent they are just racists.
What inconsistencies?
User avatar
AlphaDoG
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Vernon Illinois

Post by AlphaDoG »

Dude, I'll prosecute you for smoking pot, but if you impede a voter, then I guess you are golden.
It's never good to wake up in the shrubs naked, you either got way too drunk, or your azz is a werewolf.

Image
Post Reply