Please tell me this isn't happening...
Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250
Please tell me this isn't happening...
A US judge has decided that a 4 year old girl can be sued.
Read the link below:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/br ... 5945490166
They can't be serious surely???
Read the link below:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/br ... 5945490166
They can't be serious surely???
- Nightshade
- DBB Master
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Planet Earth, USA
- Contact:
Forget the lawyers TB, I'm referring to the international and long-established common law principle that children are innocents and cannot be sued.
This sets a very, very nasty legal precedent.
This judge has decided a 4 year old girl has a case to answer. If a clear causal link can be established between the injuries sustained by the plaintiff and the plaintiff's eventual death that same year, then it could be a case of negligent death, not death by misadventure (BIG DIFFERENCE!!) - and because it's the CHILD being sued as well as their parents, it's the *child* that may have to face the legal consequences.
This is not justice. Nor is it the fair and reasonable application of law - this is f*****g insanity!
This sets a very, very nasty legal precedent.
This judge has decided a 4 year old girl has a case to answer. If a clear causal link can be established between the injuries sustained by the plaintiff and the plaintiff's eventual death that same year, then it could be a case of negligent death, not death by misadventure (BIG DIFFERENCE!!) - and because it's the CHILD being sued as well as their parents, it's the *child* that may have to face the legal consequences.
This is not justice. Nor is it the fair and reasonable application of law - this is f*****g insanity!
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
I wanted to sue my friend's 6 month son old one time because he took a crap on my new shirt. little bugger should have known better
someone needs to sue the Judge for stupidity.
someone needs to sue the Judge for stupidity.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
― Theodore Roosevelt
― Theodore Roosevelt
A bit more info here. That judge probably never has been around todlers. I doubt that the case will go anywhere, there should be some common sense left in this world.
- Nightshade
- DBB Master
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Planet Earth, USA
- Contact:
Re:
Right, because it wasn't evident enough back when the country elected a man to play the role of President instead of actually be one back in the 80's.ThunderBunny wrote:Gren-
All common sense went out the window a long time ago.
America elected Obama. That's evidence enough.
Re:
Right. Funny how it took a actor to get the country going from the failures of a peanut farmer. Nice try my little DNC operative.Mjolnir wrote:Right, because it wasn't evident enough back when the country elected a man to play the role of President instead of actually be one back in the 80's.ThunderBunny wrote:Gren-
All common sense went out the window a long time ago.
America elected Obama. That's evidence enough.
It is only the beginning.
Under this administration a black hate group can intimidate voters at a polling station. And it was captured on video - AND it was dismissed by Mr. Holder and barry.
There's a lot of radical \"william ayers stuff\" coming if this cretin stays in office. He's only skimmed the surface of what he really wants to do.
Under this administration a black hate group can intimidate voters at a polling station. And it was captured on video - AND it was dismissed by Mr. Holder and barry.
There's a lot of radical \"william ayers stuff\" coming if this cretin stays in office. He's only skimmed the surface of what he really wants to do.
Re:
If by going you mean totally annihilating our infrastructure and making sure everyone was drowning in debt... then I guess you're right?woodchip wrote:Right. Funny how it took a actor to get the country going from the failures of a peanut farmer. Nice try my little DNC operative.Mjolnir wrote:Right, because it wasn't evident enough back when the country elected a man to play the role of President instead of actually be one back in the 80's.ThunderBunny wrote:Gren-
All common sense went out the window a long time ago.
America elected Obama. That's evidence enough.
Also note - a peanut farmer is a much harder worker than an actor. Contempt for difficult work like farming just makes you look like an ass IMO.