sometimes a President cant win for losing. the G20 was important. he did his best to honor the Vets in the way that he was able.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Foil wrote:Am I the only one who senses sarcasm in Null's original post?
nope, I took it as such, I was responding to the Post article.
I'm thinking that Bee took it serious though
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Bee wrote:what I find really sad is someone like you making an issue of this, I thought you were better than that.
Funny I dont remember writing that or anything like it.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Wasn't there some thing Bush did or didn't do during some holiday that the liberal press went all crazy over saying what an awful American he was or something but pretty much everyone else in the country/world/universe didn't care in the slightest because it was retarded?
Ferno wrote:*not aimed at null, but rather the article*
we knew what you really meant
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
null0010 wrote:obama was only over there to sneak across the border and get socialism tips from kim jong-il
or give them
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Ferno wrote:*not aimed at null, but rather the article*
we knew what you really meant
yeah right. you never do.
UHHH what do you mean by that?
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
So, the Republicans can do a better job of dealing with countries that are looking out for themselves? Yeah, suuuuuuuuuuuure. Repubs and CorproDems, will just give them more of our corporate 'bidness' by supplying the cheap labor from THEIR masses to fill the needs of OUR idiot WalMart shoppers, until we all run out of money to spend that is. That'll help THEIR economies juuuuuust fine. That's probably why Obama failed. These countries WANT a Republican American Government, so they nuked the Democrat! Suckers! AND, don't forget, Bushie and his Congress did juuuuuuuust great when he was driving!
Cat (n.) A bipolar creature which would as soon gouge your eyes out as it would cuddle.
Funny I dont remember writing that or anything like it.
