I'll try.....but, I was trying to break up separate thoughts, as opposed to responding to a half-dozen posts with one rambling missive.Foil wrote:Slick, try not to quadruple-post, would you?
A matter of style, I suppose, but if it bothers you.....
Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250
I'll try.....but, I was trying to break up separate thoughts, as opposed to responding to a half-dozen posts with one rambling missive.Foil wrote:Slick, try not to quadruple-post, would you?
Not quite, Workers in the US have to compete with their elected officials allowing rampant illegal immigration and the outsourcing of jobs to foreign countries. There is alot to say for having loyalty to one's country at the expense of gain, but at least tell it like it is. Those guys have whored America out to the world for a few meals. Stinks.Workers in the US have to compete in a global marketplace,
Actually you are. Distilling my argument into "saying the past was great" is a dip**** tactic to discount it without needing to counter it--that's not what I said. You wanna raise the bar around here you can start right there.callmeslick wrote:you aren'troid wrote:Did you miss that Slick was responding to that post by Thorne?
Thorne was saying the past was great, Slick was saying it's wasn't.
So you're agreeing with Slick, not disagreeing.
Unless i'm reading this wrong somehow.
Operative word was immigrate...not dragged here in the belly of a slave ship. Yet even the slaves descendants wound up being leaders of this countrycallmeslick wrote:woodchip wrote:If the past wasn't great, why did all those people immigrate here?
you want me to describe the process for the 12% of the population which is African American first, or save that until after I cover the ones who CHOSE to come here?
Exploited or not they still had way more opportunity than from whence they came, indeed from any other country. Unlike our modern citizenry, those "exploited" immigrants had no problem with hard work. They worked so their children could get a education and the children did, doing better than their parents...all of which made this country great. Sadly the work ethic has changed to a whiny demand that the govt. take care of them.callmeslick wrote:Yeesh! At any rate, if you were starving to death in Europe, or the target of a genocidal regime, working in a sweatshop and living in a 5th floor walkup tenement was a big step up. Didn't mean you weren't heavily exploited cheap labor, but it worked. And, they had a chance to change things due to the lower population density and available open lands to move to.
Yep.Come to think of it, the political stagnation and lack of national resolve to move forward with the times is heading us in that direction anyway.........
flip wrote:That doesn't come near to what I said.
.
you underestimate my disdain. I would make garden stakes out of many of youflip wrote:You would make slaves of all of us.
not with this populace, and at this juncture, the wealthy old families are sort of too disgusted to bail the lot of you out again(see: History of the US). When you have Tea Party Politics, you can forget about foresight and I haven't see a Congress willing to make a Key Decision in over 30 years.EDIT: This is exactly where I agree with Vision. We are at a crossroads in time where we could adapt and once again become the world power we once were. The weirdness of it all is just as you said Slick, "the political stagnation and lack of national resolve to move forward" is exactly what the problem is. Key decisions and foresight got us where we are at. I don't see it reversing itself.
So I'm right in saying we have been sold-out to China? I also like how you keep twisting stuff. Those wealthy families are the ones who pissed it all up and then try and pin it on the populace. The problem is corporate monopolies and the death of the small business man. The problem is a wrench got threw into the works and unto this day we remain "stagnant and directionless." You have a funny way of looking at things and believe me I wouldn't give a rat's ass for many of you either . Moves should be made to make this country strong by moving business back here, quit penalizing business for bringing money made abroad back home and start penalizing business for removing it. All the moves made have been to weaken America. Economy is strength in this 21'st century. Why isn't America the best place in the world to do business? Why do you keep blaming the "dumbed-down populace" when, if I really wanted to take the time, I could cite 30 different examples of decisions made by these ruling families and politicians that seem to deliberately weaken us as a nation and spread us thin throught the world. Who gave us to China? How did we go from being the most dominant country in the world and on the cutting edge to being huge debtors to China? I don't know of any person here that would have agreed to anything that would lead to that, yet that is what was done by those elected. Roid touched on this earlier, about how the sins of some are so bad they refuse to see them in light of others.not with this populace, and at this juncture, the wealthy old families are sort of too disgusted to bail the lot of you out again(see: History of the US). When you have Tea Party Politics, you can forget about foresight and I haven't see a Congress willing to make a Key Decision in over 30 years.
Sorry Thorne it was a response to Flip, i was discussing HIS DISTILLING of your point - not your original point. I wasn't going to base any arguments on that distillation, it was just a temporary mutually understood shorthand between me and flip.Sergeant Thorne wrote:Actually you are. Distilling my argument into "saying the past was great" is a dip**** tactic to discount it without needing to counter it--that's not what I said. You wanna raise the bar around here you can start right there.
And Thorne: I didn't start to paraphrase what Thorne said, FLIP DID. Disagree with him not me!BEHOLD: Sergeant Thorne doth wrote:America--individual freedom, personal property, innocent until proven guilty, checks and balances, small government, and even a concept as basic to freedom as self-determination
So i say again, you guys are actually disagreeing with eachother - and pretending you're disagreeing with us!BEHOLD: flip doth wrote:Lol, so you would have a regress back into the 19th century? I got nothing else.
no, you've been sold out by bad work ethics, disinterest in education and a culture of seeking easy money and expecting things they don't really need. The Chinese(among many) simply exploit those facts.flip wrote:So I'm right in saying we have been sold-out to China? I
. The problem is corporate monopolies and the death of the small business man. The problem is a wrench got threw into the works and unto this day we remain "stagnant and directionless." You have a funny way of looking at things and believe me I wouldn't give a rat's ass for many of you either . Moves should be made to make this country strong by moving business back here, quit penalizing business for bringing money made abroad back home and start penalizing business for removing it. All the moves made have been to weaken America. Economy is strength in this 21'st century. Why isn't America the best place in the world to do business? Why do you keep blaming the "dumbed-down populace" when, if I really wanted to take the time, I could cite 30 different examples of decisions made by these ruling families and politicians that seem to deliberately weaken us as a nation and spread us thin throught the world. Who gave us to China? How did we go from being the most dominant country in the world and on the cutting edge to being huge debtors to China? I don't know of any person here that would have agreed to anything that would lead to that, yet that is what was done by those elected. Roid touched on this earlier, about how the sins of some are so bad they refuse to see them in light of others.
Haha!flip wrote:I'm handing this one off to Thorne
all those things are related. not different issues. it's all part of the laziness that's been fostered by the entitlement mentality.callmeslick wrote:no, you've been sold out by bad work ethics, disinterest in education and a culture of seeking easy money and expecting things they don't really need. The Chinese(among many) simply exploit those facts.flip wrote:So I'm right in saying we have been sold-out to China? I
“The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.”
― Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years.”
― Alexis de Tocqueville
“There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle.”
― Alexis de Tocqueville
BS,tunnelcat wrote:That last quote by Alexis is the only one has any truth to it. The other 2 do not take into account our modern society and it's stable middle class and seems to blame only the voting public at large, ignoring the fact that corporations in the U.S. can now legally outspend the public in every way possible to get Congress to do their bidding, instead of the people's.
Also, since he came from an aristocratic family, that makes him part of the rich elite, so naturally they think they're the chosen ones of any society and can thus justify taking what they want, when they want, from those poor, stupid, sordid masses, because they deserve it. He and his ilk have come from the same ideals throughout time. They are just the rich, lazy flip side of welfare queen coin in any society.
tunnelcat wrote:Oh yeah? What about ALEC?
Alexis-Charles-Henri Clérel de Tocqueville, 29 July 1805, Paris – 16 April 1859, Cannes)
Corporations could be seen as merely a tool used to achieve the ends Alexis de Tocqueville was talking about. ie: The higher ups in Corporations are indeed the rich (they sure as hell ain't poor), and they steer the corp and the gov to maintain that.tunnelcat wrote:the fact that corporations in the U.S. can now legally outspend the public in every way possible to get Congress to do their bidding, instead of the people's.