CUDA wrote:**** why do you even attempt to bring forward such crap???
Because I wouldn't put it past some agitator, Christian or not. You'll notice that the guy didn't kill anyone, and the one guard who was shot was slightly wounded in the arm. A very preferable outcome, but kind of restrained don't you think for someone who went in with several fully loaded clips? But I've only thought of this scenario because of my tin hat.
But since Christian groups are spending millions to frame their side of the argument, I wouldn't put it past some of these guys to try something like this. These organizations are a self loathing and hateful lot of people with the power and money to go after o
ther people they perceive as deviants deserving of death. Nice Christian values. By the way, there are no large, massively funded groups in Washington, like The Family Research Counsel and Focus on the Family, that are largely dedicated to the outright stigmatization and repression of another group of people in our society. I don't see anything near that in organization from the LGBT community. Oh, they have their activists and small groups, but not the monetary clout and power base that these Christian-based groups wield. There is the HRC, but they tend to be underfunded and tepid with their activism.
CUDA wrote:I wont argue with you. but your comments once again had nothing to do with the topic and was a direct attempt to show your unabashed hatred for the Christian community.
NO ONE until YOU mentioned the religious aspect had brought it into this discussion. this guy started shooting because he didn't like their political position. please try for once to put the blame where it belongs.. with the shooter.
Disingenuous
So what was the shooter's political position? He didn't like their politicking and lobbying and he was supposedly a member of the LGBT community. Most members of that community also know full well who their adversaries are AND their religious affiliations. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to connect the dots.
Sergeant Thorne chimed in with his "Christian values" too, although
after I made my comment. And whenever gay issues crop up in any discussion, comments on those preferred Christian
values from scripture won't be far behind.
Sergeant Thorne wrote:I'll tell you something, Top Gun. When you meet the Son of God it'll shake you to your core, and it'll likely be too damn late. "Christian my ass" isn't too far off, but I have the advantage of seeing what's written plainly on the pages of scripture when I look at it. God's people cast the perverted persons out of the country under the old covenant. It's not good to call right wrong and wrong right. It troubles me that LGBT is spoken of as being acceptable. And why? Did you all really come up believing this, or do you just accept it because it's the thing to do--because if you don't you're a bigot? I feel sorry for you if you can't even tell how screwed up it is, because that says a lot about where you're at and it's not a good place to be.
. I can see getting between 2 people who are fixing to physically fight but deleting remarks starts to cross a dangerous line. Like me and Ferno for instance, we have not seen eye to eye on somethings, but there is nothing he has ever written that I feel should just be removed from existence. Say TB does go on a rampage one day, Foil keeps deleting all the evidence against him 
