I've enjoyed not spending time shouting about stuff on the interweb, since this was the only place I did that I've been free of it and better off for giving it up.
Not that any of that really matters but I guess I just want to put my sudden brief reappearance into context so you will know that this isn't my attempt to dive back in and stir he pot. I just want to warn you all about what I think might be about to happen.
I started to follow my old form and write out a long post explaining why I believe what I do but that was too much like the old days and if I invest that much substance into it I'd feel obligated to stick around and defend against some of the inevitable challenges that my comments will draw.
So instead I'm just going to tell you what I texted to my daughter who is living in a dorm at the University of South Carolina, she is a freshman there and about 3 hours from where we live. Being a protective kind of father it hit me like ton of bricks when I thought about this and so I had to warn her and I figured you guys might not have thought about it.
So here you go:
"Do me a favor and don't be anywhere punks on the street(driving or walking) can target you starting Tuesday evening through possibly the weekend. I think Romney is going to win and since the race pimps have created a monster I'm afraid it is going to want to riot and seek 'revenge'.
Only drive in a car with Obama stickers on it or a designated shooter....preferably both."
Well there you have it.
Please watch your backs because Romney is probably going to win big.
The polls don't reflect that because they have misrepresented the make up of the electorate in some cases actually inflating dem turnout to be even greater than it was in 2008.
As if there is no increase in republican momentum, like the 2010/tea party election was an anomaly instead of a sign of a rising revolt against everything Obama stands for?!?
And as if there is still that attraction to create a historic event, that of being able to elect the first black man to the highest office in the world! Sorry that ship has sailed, you only get to do that once. And in 2008 Obama had no ties to the problems people faced....today he owns a big piece of many of them.
It is just ridiculous to use a 2008 model for weighting the polls when it doesn't represent the electorate as it exists today.
All Romney had to do was show up at that first debate and be confident and capable and he basically surged in the polls. And that surge pretty much held until a hurricane shut off the media for a few days and now he's moving up once again....
Well just showing up like that wouldn't have been enough in 2008....go back to 2008 and take McCain out and plug Romney in and Obama beats him just like he beat McCain!
But in 2010 Obama isn't a beautiful dream....he's a known quantity, he is 4 years of just-as-bad as any other ★■◆● to have the job before him! And he is a conservatives nightmare....put another way, he is a gift to a republican campaign manager. It isn't hard to boost your turnout when turning out means you get to kick someone like Obama out of office!! Yet the polls try to tell you we are still back in 2008?!?!
My best guess is they let it go this way because they want to avoid discouraging their voters resulting in a further loss of turnout and the excuses the race baiters will use in the wake of this 'surprise' election loss will be to continue the narrative that they have already put in place which is the white man stole it from the black man.
Well it looks like I had to go off and explain my thoughts any way...oh well, have fun with it but please watch your backs, get some Obama stickers for your wife and kids cars and protect yourselves.
See ya again sometime
Craig
All sorts of crude anti-racial racial jokes/slurs come to mind, but let's just say that any son-of-a-★■◆● dumb enough to cause trouble around here because he's worked up about the color of the president will receive a well-deserved reality check. ...I don't suppose selling them as laborers to pay for their mischief would sit well with the rest. 
, but i should still correct myself: 
