farewell USS Enterprise CVN-65
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
farewell USS Enterprise CVN-65
Looks like she's been retired. a grand old lady
I'll never forget being out to sea off the coast of SoCal in 1981 and watching her come out of a fog bank at full speed. I was on watch on the bridge of my ship at the time. we had her tracking at almost 50 knots, 1087 foot long 90,000 tons of machine TEARING through the water at 60 MPH it was more then impressive.
Salute Big-E and welcome CVN -80 USS Enterprise
I'll never forget being out to sea off the coast of SoCal in 1981 and watching her come out of a fog bank at full speed. I was on watch on the bridge of my ship at the time. we had her tracking at almost 50 knots, 1087 foot long 90,000 tons of machine TEARING through the water at 60 MPH it was more then impressive.
Salute Big-E and welcome CVN -80 USS Enterprise
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
― Theodore Roosevelt
― Theodore Roosevelt
- Krom
- DBB Database Master
- Posts: 16138
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
- Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
- Contact:
Re: farewell USS Enterprise CVN-65
51 years of service, that is impressive.
Also good to know it won't be the last ship carry the name "Enterprise".
Also good to know it won't be the last ship carry the name "Enterprise".
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
Re: farewell USS Enterprise CVN-65
OOOH OOOH a Star trek reference from the end GenerationsKrom wrote:51 years of service, that is impressive.
Also good to know it won't be the last ship carry the name "Enterprise".
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
― Theodore Roosevelt
― Theodore Roosevelt
- Tunnelcat
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 13743
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:32 pm
- Location: Pacific Northwest, U.S.A.
Re: farewell USS Enterprise CVN-65
If you'll remember, Chekov and Uhura stole power from the reactor of the USS Enterprise in the movie, Star Trek, The Voyage Home.
However, the ship that was used in the movie was of the USS Ranger, not the USS Enterprise. If you had been a USS Enterprise expert, you'd have notice that the "island" superstructure was not from the USS Enterprise. Oopsie.
It is kind of sad to see such a great ship have to retire though.
However, the ship that was used in the movie was of the USS Ranger, not the USS Enterprise. If you had been a USS Enterprise expert, you'd have notice that the "island" superstructure was not from the USS Enterprise. Oopsie.
It is kind of sad to see such a great ship have to retire though.
Cat (n.) A bipolar creature which would as soon gouge your eyes out as it would cuddle.
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
Re: farewell USS Enterprise CVN-65
My best friend was serving on Ranger when that movie was filmed. not to mention that the deck configuration of Ranger is different then Enterprise..elevators are in different places. Ranger is a Forestal class Carrier, now moored in Bremmerton. Enterprise is the only ship of her class soon the be scrapped in Bremmerton.tunnelcat wrote:If you'll remember, Chekov and Uhura stole power from the reactor of the USS Enterprise in the movie, Star Trek, The Voyage Home.
However, the ship that was used in the movie was of the USS Ranger, not the USS Enterprise. If you had been a USS Enterprise expert, you'd have notice that the "island" superstructure was not from the USS Enterprise. Oopsie.
It is kind of sad to see such a great ship have to retire though.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
― Theodore Roosevelt
― Theodore Roosevelt
- Krom
- DBB Database Master
- Posts: 16138
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
- Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
- Contact:
Re: farewell USS Enterprise CVN-65
Technically its the other way around, the reason the ship in Star Trek was called Enterprise was in reference to the real CVN-65 one.
- Tunnelcat
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 13743
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:32 pm
- Location: Pacific Northwest, U.S.A.
Re: farewell USS Enterprise CVN-65
Yeah, but the island is a very prominent feature. A little difficult to gloss over in a movie, although with CG, a whole fake USS Enterprise could be rendered to mask the difference.CUDA wrote:My best friend was serving on Ranger when that movie was filmed. not to mention that the deck configuration of Ranger is different then Enterprise..elevators are in different places. Ranger is a Forestal class Carrier, now moored in Bremmerton. Enterprise is the only ship of her class soon the be scrapped in Bremmerton.
So they're going to scrap her? Is the old girl just getting too expensive to maintain? They kept the Battleship Missouri as a museum piece, so why not the first nuclear powered aircraft carrier? That IS history.
Cat (n.) A bipolar creature which would as soon gouge your eyes out as it would cuddle.
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
Re: farewell USS Enterprise CVN-65
they have to basically destroy her to get the reactors out.tunnelcat wrote:Yeah, but the island is a very prominent feature. A little difficult to gloss over in a movie, although with CG, a whole fake USS Enterprise could be rendered to mask the difference.CUDA wrote:My best friend was serving on Ranger when that movie was filmed. not to mention that the deck configuration of Ranger is different then Enterprise..elevators are in different places. Ranger is a Forestal class Carrier, now moored in Bremmerton. Enterprise is the only ship of her class soon the be scrapped in Bremmerton.
So they're going to scrap her? Is the old girl just getting too expensive to maintain? They kept the Battleship Missouri as a museum piece, so why not the first nuclear powered aircraft carrier? That IS history.
I guess it's just the history of the name. CV-6 the most highly decorated ship of WW2 with 20 battle starts out a possible 22 during the war in the Pacific and at one time the ONLY carrier left to face the Japanese. ended up with the same fate. the scrap heap
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
― Theodore Roosevelt
― Theodore Roosevelt
- Flatlander
- DBB Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 1999 2:01 am
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
Re: farewell USS Enterprise CVN-65
Huh. Bremerton's close enough I've actually been there. Didn't see any carriers on that day though.