sigma wrote:
In my opinion you are using a studied inadequately and terms. Where is the fear and ignorance? I'm not sure that you understand the meaning of these words. In the event that you understand the meaning of these words, your speech becomes even more bizarre. Yesterday you completed courses Neuro-linguistic programming?
Congratulations!
I need no special educational training to read the words you have contributed to your thread and observe:
1. you don't know anything about homosexuals, but view them as strange
2. you know nothing about folks with black skin, but view them as strange
3. you claim that 'strange' people have to be careful in Russia
4. you claim that discussing your clear fear-based classification of 'strange' people will get a person beaten in Russia
5. you claim that this status quo is somehow preferable or even superior to the acceptance shown by other nations.
Your words. Your claims about your 'national identity'. Like I mockingly noted, you paint a picture of Russia that is anything but inviting. I am glad you enjoy it there, and find it comfortable. Where I take issue is when you suggest(here's where the nationalistic part comes in) that Russia has anything of substance to contribute to mankind, the UN or anything else outside your tight cocoon of your own creation. Until you become more accepting and tolerant, you do not. Period.
p.s.--it was pointed out to you, and perhaps you didn't get it, that many of the things Russia HAS historically contributed, were created by some of those types of folks you describe as 'strange'. And, I might add, much of it was contributed to the larger world ONLY by those folks escaping, or having their works escape, the tightly limiting 'Russian society' you describe.
"The Party told you to reject all evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
George Orwell---"1984"