You were pontificating.......Spidey wrote:Nobody has ever died from lack of insurance coverage.
This is exactly why we can't have honest debate in this country.
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2 ... -coverage/
Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250
You were pontificating.......Spidey wrote:Nobody has ever died from lack of insurance coverage.
This is exactly why we can't have honest debate in this country.
We can't have any Christian charity from government, Slick. Remember the separation between church and state!callmeslick wrote:Christian charity from another corner.Sergeant Thorne wrote:So are these people dying from ignorance or a lack of insurance coverage?
EDIT: Maybe if we start air-dropping bundles of money in large cities it will save lives!
You're right on that point, I'm not disagreeing with you there. Having to have insurance just to get health care is absolutely ridiculous. You walk into any hospital and the first thing they ask you is: "Do you have insurance"? No insurance, no care. It's a scam and people die because of it. So it's not really about having insurance, it's about not being able to get any healthcare without that precious insurance, because it's just too expensive to access and buy in the first place. That's the problem with Obamacare, the requirement to have insurance. There's also no way to control costs because there is no incentive to control costs. Any other industry, like computers for instance, most technical improvements tend to make things cheaper to build, more advanced and cheaper to buy. But all the improvements we've seen over the years in health care have only given the system more reasons to jack up prices, locking out more and more patients, in which case, THEY PROBABLY ENDED UP DYING.Spidey wrote:No one dies from lack of insurance…they die from illness and disease, which goes without treatment.
Blaming it on the lack of insurance is a blatant attempt to ignore the real issues in the country, because the real crisis is the cost of health care, not the lack of insurance.
Also, the failure to deal with admittance policies in this country, where a hospital won’t treat you if you don’t have insurance. Quite immoral if you ask me.
And the elitism that deliberately restricts supply…etc…etc…on and on and so forth...
Keep all of the focus on insurance, while the real problems fester on…
You’re being brainwashed.
I can't tell whether you hang around Washington too much or whether Washington hangs around you too much. A bull★■◆● attack like this has 3 interconnected purposes: demonize the opponent, legitimize the issue, and intimidation the onlookers. We'll skip the character defense because it just legitimizes the argument by drawing attention away from the question of its legitimacy. A lack of medical insurance does not kill people. People die. People die from things that are preventable. Sometimes people even die because no one has enslaved them and taken care of them in exchange for their freedom. People die because no one air-drops tax-payer money into major cities... you monsters...callmeslick wrote:Oh, and Thorne, my comment was really referring to your lack of charity towards your fellow man by callously mocking the fact that some of them are dying as a result of not having basic medical insurance. Maybe, I should have been more blunt and questioned your lack of Christian morals altogether.
And where are the christian morals that deemed charity is no longer tax exempt? How many are dying because far fewer people are donating to organizations like kitchens feeding the homeless and places that shelter them. Nice to see you think the govt can do a better job.callmeslick wrote:
Oh, and Thorne, my comment was really referring to your lack of charity towards your fellow man by callously mocking the fact that some of them are dying as a result of not having basic medical insurance. Maybe, I should have been more blunt and questioned your lack of Christian morals altogether.