It never ceases to amaze me that people will put "protocols" pertaining to a given situation as some sort of unbreakable rule. Here is a case where school officials ought to be charged with child endangerment and be punished just as how they treated a student:
"A Minnesota public high school was so committed to obeying its fire drill policy to the exact letter of the law that it forced a female student–dressed only in a swimsuit, and sopping wet–to stand outside in the freezing cold for ten minutes. As a result, she suffered frostbite."
"It was 5 degrees below zero in St. Paul that day. With the windchill, it was 25 degrees below zero."
http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/03/schoo ... e-results/
So why shouldn't the school officials who prevented her from going someplace warm not be arrested?
Protocols
Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250
Re: Protocols
They should. That's beyond asinine.
- callmeslick
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 14546
- Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:12 am
- Location: Rockland,DE and Parksley, VA
Re: Protocols
completely irresponsible if it was a known practice drill.
"The Party told you to reject all evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
George Orwell---"1984"
George Orwell---"1984"
Re: Protocols
Even if it was a real fire, one of the teachers couldn't get her into a goddamn car to keep her warm?
- callmeslick
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 14546
- Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:12 am
- Location: Rockland,DE and Parksley, VA
Re: Protocols
good point above......
"The Party told you to reject all evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
George Orwell---"1984"
George Orwell---"1984"
Re: Protocols
I have to wonder why anyone was listening to the teachers when a childs life was in danger?
- Sergeant Thorne
- DBB Material Defender
- Posts: 4641
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Indiana, U.S.A.
Re: Protocols
This is the kind of person our society is asking for, despite how much they may complain when the ★■◆● hits the fan.