"In some cases, the broadcast networks have failed to include such scientists for years, while including alarmist scientists within the past six months. ABC, CBS and NBC's lengthy omission of scientists critical of global warming alarmism propped up the myth of a scientific consensus, despite the fact that many scientists and thousands of peer-reviewed studies disagree.
"Neither CBS nor ABC have included a skeptical scientists in their news shows within the past 1,300 days, but both networks included alarmists within the past 160 days -- CBS as recently as 22 days ago. When the networks did include other viewpoints, the experts were dismissed as "out of the scientific mainstream" or backed by "oil and coal companies."
http://cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/sean-long ... -1300-days
So if the above is true, then how can one form a credible view of climate change based on select news reporting? Yes I expect certain peeps to reply back that this is not a mainstream outlet reporting this. My reply is find a mainstream source that refutes this before making biting replies. And remember...I bite back
