using the definition preferred by some on here....

For discussion of life's issues: current events, social trends and personal opinions.

Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250

Post Reply
User avatar
callmeslick
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 14546
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:12 am
Location: Rockland,DE and Parksley, VA

using the definition preferred by some on here....

Post by callmeslick »

....wherein(see Detroit thread), poverty is a result of political leadership and 'liberal' politics and policies, let's contrast with how things are working out in all those states that went Red during the 80s and 90s after the Reagan Revolution:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/0 ... mg00000063

yeah, let's have some more of that. :roll:
"The Party told you to reject all evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
George Orwell---"1984"
User avatar
woodchip
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
Posts: 17865
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 1999 2:01 am

Re: using the definition preferred by some on here....

Post by woodchip »

You are looking at it all wrong:


"Income is growing much faster in Republican-leaning "red states" than in Democratic-tilting "blue states" or the pivotal swing states that will decide the 2012 presidential election, a USA TODAY analysis finds."

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nat ... 57846600/1
User avatar
callmeslick
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 14546
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:12 am
Location: Rockland,DE and Parksley, VA

Re: using the definition preferred by some on here....

Post by callmeslick »

not looking at anything wrong, in fact you add fuel to my argument. Under Republicans for 30 years or so, all of those states rank at the bottom in income. In other words, they had nowhere to go but up, and were hit especially hard by the recession. The blue states were hit less hard, and had higher average incomes going in, so PERCENT recovery shows NOTHING, Woody. Worth noting though, that the Obama recovery has helped all states, not just those whose politics agree with him. The current status quo, as one of those maps showed, is that Red states lag FAR behind blue states in terms of average income(and quality of education, number of high school grads, percentage with health insurance, etc, etc). I don't think you're going to sell that GOP kool-aid to anyone in terms of benefitting the average citizen economically.
"The Party told you to reject all evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
George Orwell---"1984"
User avatar
woodchip
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
Posts: 17865
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 1999 2:01 am

Re: using the definition preferred by some on here....

Post by woodchip »

Preach your gospel to the blacks who have gained nothing under Obama. I'll go so far as to say a good percentage of blacks will not be voting a Democrat into the white house in 2016.
User avatar
callmeslick
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 14546
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:12 am
Location: Rockland,DE and Parksley, VA

Re: using the definition preferred by some on here....

Post by callmeslick »

oh, sure, they'll be voting GOP, for sure.......that bunch has always had their backs.
Hell, if the GOP lost this guy, they're sunk, long-term, even in the South:
http://www.clarionledger.com/story/dail ... /11763673/

not just that he quit, as a core young activist......he is JOINING THE DEMOCRATS!!
"The Party told you to reject all evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
George Orwell---"1984"
User avatar
Spidey
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10808
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Earth

Re: using the definition preferred by some on here....

Post by Spidey »

I love how these issues never have any real analysis, just political spin, nah…don’t discuss why the southern states are really way behind the rest of America in context to the post civil war, and things like how long they were governed by racist Democrats…

So let’s just oversimplify things like some here like to do…

What we have learned….

1. Republicans suck at running states…

2. Democrats suck at running cities….
User avatar
woodchip
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
Posts: 17865
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 1999 2:01 am

Re: using the definition preferred by some on here....

Post by woodchip »

You think if someone like Ben Carson ran, the blacks would vote for Hillary? And if you want I can dig up instances of black democratic candidates getting shafted by their party during election cycles.
User avatar
callmeslick
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 14546
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:12 am
Location: Rockland,DE and Parksley, VA

Re: using the definition preferred by some on here....

Post by callmeslick »

Spidey wrote:I love how these issues never have any real analysis, just political spin, nah…don’t discuss why the southern states are really way behind the rest of America in context to the post civil war, and things like how long they were governed by racist Democrats…
fair enough....and when those racist Dems became racist Republicans in the late 1970s?
So let’s just oversimplify things like some here like to do…
you do get the gist of exactly why I posted this. Stuff is FAR more complex than to say, 'look what liberal politics did', or 'look how badly Red states' residents trail the Blue states'. This thread was a DIRECT response to the Detroit thread.
"The Party told you to reject all evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
George Orwell---"1984"
User avatar
callmeslick
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 14546
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:12 am
Location: Rockland,DE and Parksley, VA

Re: using the definition preferred by some on here....

Post by callmeslick »

woodchip wrote:You think if someone like Ben Carson ran, the blacks would vote for Hillary?
yes
And if you want I can dig up instances of black democratic candidates getting shafted by their party during election cycles.
proving what, exactly?
"The Party told you to reject all evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
George Orwell---"1984"
Post Reply