I guess that tech I suggested isn't too expensive after all
Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250
- Will Robinson
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 10135
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am
- Tunnelcat
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 13742
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:32 pm
- Location: Pacific Northwest, U.S.A.
Re: I guess that tech I suggested isn't too expensive after
Could it distinguish fireworks from gunshots I wonder?
Cat (n.) A bipolar creature which would as soon gouge your eyes out as it would cuddle.
Re: I guess that tech I suggested isn't too expensive after
Yes…can’t you?
Well I guess you have to hear them all of the time to be able to tell the difference. (gunshots here several times a month)
Seems to be a huge waste of money…I mean…with all of those gun control laws in the state and city, who could possibly be firing all these shots.
Well I guess you have to hear them all of the time to be able to tell the difference. (gunshots here several times a month)
Seems to be a huge waste of money…I mean…with all of those gun control laws in the state and city, who could possibly be firing all these shots.
Re: I guess that tech I suggested isn't too expensive after
Probably the police shooting at an unarmed person 41 times.
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
Re: I guess that tech I suggested isn't too expensive after
I thought all those anti gun laws that NY has and all the Money the Bloomberg spent getting rid of guns removed the need for such technology
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
― Theodore Roosevelt
― Theodore Roosevelt
- Krom
- DBB Database Master
- Posts: 16138
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
- Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
- Contact:
Re: I guess that tech I suggested isn't too expensive after
This kind of technology sounds like something that is only expensive when the military/government is doing it. One laptop and a half dozen cellular phones plugged in to key locations throughout an area with upgraded microphones could do it for dirt cheap after a few hours of programming.
- Tunnelcat
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 13742
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:32 pm
- Location: Pacific Northwest, U.S.A.
Re: I guess that tech I suggested isn't too expensive after
True, but some of the illegal fireworks people shoot off here sound like cannons being fired.Spidey wrote:Yes…can’t you?
Well I guess you have to hear them all of the time to be able to tell the difference. (gunshots here several times a month)
Seems to be a huge waste of money…I mean…with all of those gun control laws in the state and city, who could possibly be firing all these shots.
Cat (n.) A bipolar creature which would as soon gouge your eyes out as it would cuddle.
Re: I guess that tech I suggested isn't too expensive after
I bet you could do it with nothing more than a free (seriously battery draining) app, any phone can listen from your pocket/bag, recording the past hour of audio. When the app receives a request, all phones can analyse their cached audio data and send the results (or just send the audio data, then analyse it centrally).Krom wrote:This kind of technology sounds like something that is only expensive when the military/government is doing it. One laptop and a half dozen cellular phones plugged in to key locations throughout an area with upgraded microphones could do it for dirt cheap after a few hours of programming.
It could be calibrated by firing test shots every now and again. Better yet - have it sync to any church bells in your area. There's probably tons of loud non-suspicious sounds a cop car could make to regularly sync everyone's local system (once a day). Even a loud car muffler, but with a specific easy to identify signature/frequency, drive that around the city once a day.
It might not be particularly accurate, because of GPS inconsistencies. But if people are anything like me, their phone spends most of it's time on only a few specific desks at work/home (which could have their geolocation entered manually for very high accuracy). Hell, that'd be the perfect solution, because the battery drain won't be an issue if the app is only active when the phone is on it's usual charging location. Still... i think we all know better thesedays to trust an official listening device in our homes/offices to not snoop on us (no thank u).
But i doubt the police really expect to be able to pin-point the individual shooter amongst a crowd - all they want is a location so they can immediately dispatch units to the hot zone, a vague area.
Ok, in retrospect maybe just install the app on cop phones, and also add it to all cop cars (like Krom says, nothing special, just a cheap-as-★■◆● android device with a mic or 2 on the car roof). Surely that should be enough, what with all their patrolling.
They can sync everytime they return to the station (maybe during recharge).
.... ok now i'm getting kinda nervous about the posabilities of multiple cops walking around a crowd, like a protest maybe, automatically mapping the locations of every voice they can triangulate from the chatter.