How do I optimize a Voodoo5 System for D3?
- WarAdvocat
- DBB Defender
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2002 2:01 am
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
How do I optimize a Voodoo5 System for D3?
System Configuration:
P4 1.7ghz
512 MB PC 100 SDRAM
RealTek Avance AC 97 (onboard) sound
VOODOO5 5500 Video Card (64 MB RAM)
Internet over LAN (onboard VIA Chipset)
Win98 SE fully updated, including DirectX 9.0b
How should I have my BIOS, Drivers & Commandline set up? Currently I have the voodoo5 Drivers & BIOS at default settings.
My current commandline includes
-nointro -nomusic -nopentium3 -nosparkles -nomotionblur
I get timetests min 43/max 200ish on secret2.dem (with sound and network on)
P4 1.7ghz
512 MB PC 100 SDRAM
RealTek Avance AC 97 (onboard) sound
VOODOO5 5500 Video Card (64 MB RAM)
Internet over LAN (onboard VIA Chipset)
Win98 SE fully updated, including DirectX 9.0b
How should I have my BIOS, Drivers & Commandline set up? Currently I have the voodoo5 Drivers & BIOS at default settings.
My current commandline includes
-nointro -nomusic -nopentium3 -nosparkles -nomotionblur
I get timetests min 43/max 200ish on secret2.dem (with sound and network on)
- De Rigueur
- DBB Admiral
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Rural Mississippi, USA
- WarAdvocat
- DBB Defender
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2002 2:01 am
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
- Testiculese
- DBB Material Defender
- Posts: 4689
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2001 3:01 am
Hmm..what? FX5900, baby!
960x720 vsync'd looked/played best for me at that processor speed. Just make sure your Display settings Refresh rate is properly configg'ed.
Right-click on Desktop,->Properties->Settings. Change to 960x720. Hit apply. Then (Hit OK, then) hit Advanced. Go to Adapter. Change the dropdown to 85..100..whatever the highest available setting is that works. Hit ok. Change back to your regular resolution, and then hit ok.
BIOS AGP Arpeture can be 128 or 256, I think it was. I don't recall a difference between the two.
960x720 vsync'd looked/played best for me at that processor speed. Just make sure your Display settings Refresh rate is properly configg'ed.
Right-click on Desktop,->Properties->Settings. Change to 960x720. Hit apply. Then (Hit OK, then) hit Advanced. Go to Adapter. Change the dropdown to 85..100..whatever the highest available setting is that works. Hit ok. Change back to your regular resolution, and then hit ok.
BIOS AGP Arpeture can be 128 or 256, I think it was. I don't recall a difference between the two.
- WarAdvocat
- DBB Defender
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2002 2:01 am
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
- Krom
- DBB Database Master
- Posts: 16138
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
- Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
- Contact:
I have a 5900 Ultra, white square doesnt bother me all that much (dont really see it that often).
-nointro -nomusic -nopentium3 -nosparkles -nomotionblur
You should delete -nopentium3 unless there is a problem, disabling that also disables some performance enhancments from SSE, it will be faster without it. Also it is redundant with -nosparkles and -nomotionblur because those are the only visible SSE enhancements in D3. The ones that you dont see as easly are the 10-15% boost in the indoor triangle setup engine.
-Krom
-nointro -nomusic -nopentium3 -nosparkles -nomotionblur
You should delete -nopentium3 unless there is a problem, disabling that also disables some performance enhancments from SSE, it will be faster without it. Also it is redundant with -nosparkles and -nomotionblur because those are the only visible SSE enhancements in D3. The ones that you dont see as easly are the 10-15% boost in the indoor triangle setup engine.
-Krom
- WarAdvocat
- DBB Defender
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2002 2:01 am
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
- WarAdvocat
- DBB Defender
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2002 2:01 am
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
-framecap 0 -fastdemo -nomotionblur -nomusic -nosparkles -nomotionblur -nointro -playermessages -usesmoothing -deadzone0 0.0 -deadzone1 0.0 -timetest secret2.dem
1024 x 768 Resolution, Full Detail ("very high" settings in Setup Application)
123.87 Descent3 v1.4
72 Min
233 Max
120 Second 1
72 Second 2
97 Second 3
81 Second 4
168 Second 5
166 Second 6
110 Second 7
178 Second 8
233 Second 9
199 Second 10
210 Second 11
123 Second 12
129 Second 13
101 Second 14
87 Second 15
87 Second 16
98 Second 17
107 Second 18
95 Second 19
113 Second 20
130 Second 21
149 Second 22
154 Second 23
145 Second 24
72 Second 25
90 Second 26
94 Second 27
96 Second 28
Supose this will do.
1024 x 768 Resolution, Full Detail ("very high" settings in Setup Application)
123.87 Descent3 v1.4
72 Min
233 Max
120 Second 1
72 Second 2
97 Second 3
81 Second 4
168 Second 5
166 Second 6
110 Second 7
178 Second 8
233 Second 9
199 Second 10
210 Second 11
123 Second 12
129 Second 13
101 Second 14
87 Second 15
87 Second 16
98 Second 17
107 Second 18
95 Second 19
113 Second 20
130 Second 21
149 Second 22
154 Second 23
145 Second 24
72 Second 25
90 Second 26
94 Second 27
96 Second 28
Supose this will do.
- WarAdvocat
- DBB Defender
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2002 2:01 am
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
Even more: the video card isn't the bottleneck in this system. It's the RAM and the Processor.
Considering that I re-built the system to use what I have on hand, I think it does quite well for a $65.00 computer (and that includes the $30.00 it cost to ship it from my dad's house where it was sitting in his attic, dead). Hell, arguably I made money on this bad boy, in light of the fact that I swapped the CD-RW and DVD into my main system.
Yeah, I could swap in a Geforce card. Maybe push a few extra frames, even, but since I intend to play D3 with this 'puter, why would I want to use a sub-optimal API like OpenGL when I can use Glide? And factually, I'm not getting timetests like the above with full detail on @ 800 x 600, 1024 x 768, 1200 x 1024 or at any other resolution on my other P4 1.7ghz (FX 5900) system.
I guess I gotta jump on the STFU Mobius bandwagon here.
KROM: I edited in display settings on my timetest post. 1024x768xFullDetail so it's actually rather impressive imho.
Considering that I re-built the system to use what I have on hand, I think it does quite well for a $65.00 computer (and that includes the $30.00 it cost to ship it from my dad's house where it was sitting in his attic, dead). Hell, arguably I made money on this bad boy, in light of the fact that I swapped the CD-RW and DVD into my main system.
Yeah, I could swap in a Geforce card. Maybe push a few extra frames, even, but since I intend to play D3 with this 'puter, why would I want to use a sub-optimal API like OpenGL when I can use Glide? And factually, I'm not getting timetests like the above with full detail on @ 800 x 600, 1024 x 768, 1200 x 1024 or at any other resolution on my other P4 1.7ghz (FX 5900) system.
I guess I gotta jump on the STFU Mobius bandwagon here.
KROM: I edited in display settings on my timetest post. 1024x768xFullDetail so it's actually rather impressive imho.
- BUBBALOU
- DBB Benefactor
- Posts: 4198
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 1999 2:01 am
- Location: Dallas Texas USA
- Contact:
I guess you missed the Whole Point to why WarAdvocat built this LEGACY BOX..D1/D2/D3 plus what ever other Glide/OpenGL 98 games are out thereMobius wrote:Question: How do I optimize a Voodoo5 System for D3?
Someone has to say it...
Answer: "Remove Voodoo5, replace with actual video card."
He has another Machine WIth XP/Nvidia...blah blah,so forth and so on(trite expression) I am not hacking My XP machine for DOS Sound Emulators and Glide Wrappers. I too have my own legacy box for the same reason!
- Testiculese
- DBB Material Defender
- Posts: 4689
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2001 3:01 am
- Admiral LSD
- DBB Admiral
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Northam, W.A., Australia
- Contact:
- STRESSTEST
- DBB DemiGod
- Posts: 6574
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 1999 3:01 am
- Testiculese
- DBB Material Defender
- Posts: 4689
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2001 3:01 am
XeonJr wrote:Heres a little something just for you, Ferno!
LMAO!! Xeon
- WarAdvocat
- DBB Defender
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2002 2:01 am
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
It's in there, look at the top line of my timetest post.
I'm actually running 85hz/vsynch now, seems to play and/or look better on glide than openGL.
I think it's pretty stupid how <certain people> are knocking the hardware, considering that the hardware is the one thing that will not be changing.
Thanks to all who HAVE contributed. I'm still tweaking this sucker, I am shooting for 200 frames in the timetest. Currently I average 200 in multi, which is all that really matters to me, but tweaking is fun.
I'm actually running 85hz/vsynch now, seems to play and/or look better on glide than openGL.
I think it's pretty stupid how <certain people> are knocking the hardware, considering that the hardware is the one thing that will not be changing.
Thanks to all who HAVE contributed. I'm still tweaking this sucker, I am shooting for 200 frames in the timetest. Currently I average 200 in multi, which is all that really matters to me, but tweaking is fun.