Sharpton calls for protests in suppt of minority NYPD killed

[CUDA]

NOT

[snoopy]

This all really saddens me.

[woodchip]

Sharpton is back tracking now but his racial verbal pandemics are out of the bag, the result of which are the deaths of these 2 cops. Hope you're happy rev. Al...along with your instigating friend in the white house.

[Will Robinson]

The people calling for the death of cops, as well as the ones killing cops, are of no standing thus we shouldn't be talking about them because we are racists if we do.
That's what slick said anyway...

[Tunnelcat]

Both of those cops were minorities. Sharpton's making a mess of the whole sad set of affairs and he should keep his trap shut from now on.

[CUDA]

Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) was called out on live television by CNN host Ashleigh Banfield on Monday after the Democrat claimed anti-police protesters in New York City never chanted for “dead cops” — even though demonstrators were recently caught on video clearly chanting for dead police officers.

“There are people who are marching through the streets calling for dead cops in New York,” Banfield said.

“They are not,” Rangel shot back, seemingly confident he was right on the issue.

We’ve got the video,” the CNN host added. “It’s heartbreaking to see people marching through the streets of New York saying, ‘What do we want? Dead cops. When do we want it? Now.’ And they said it over and over again.”

“It’s tragic to think that this is acceptable,” she continued. “For them it was.”

Rangel quickly changed his tune, telling Banfield that it’s not “acceptable” to chant for dead cops. He also argued there are “crazy people” involved in all movements and they should be condemned.

[Top Gun]

Sharpton is back tracking now but his racial verbal pandemics are out of the bag, the result of which are the deaths of these 2 cops. Hope you're happy rev. Al...along with your instigating friend in the white house.

A career criminal and certifiable nutjob kills two officers, and somehow people who spoke up about possibly-questionable police tactics are to blame? Give me a ★■◆●ing break woody. Weren't you just the one deriding people for milking a tragedy?

[callmeslick]

The people calling for the death of cops, as well as the ones killing cops, are of no standing thus we shouldn't be talking about them because we are racists if we do.
That's what slick said anyway...

please, show us where I did, or be presumed the same liar as always.



For the record, while I can see a lot of anger, resentment and frustration as justified, there is NEVER a justification for killing others.

[Will Robinson]

The people calling for the death of cops, as well as the ones killing cops, are of no standing thus we shouldn't be talking about them because we are racists if we do.
That's what slick said anyway...

please, show us where I did, or be presumed the same liar as always.



For the record, while I can see a lot of anger, resentment and frustration as justified, there is NEVER a justification for killing others.

Lol, you are so predictable. Just like Rangel. You just proclaim something never happened in spite of the evidence and in this case it was you who said it and you still blatantly deny it happened.

In another thread, when I posted that people were calling for the death of cops you said it wasn't so....when I then posted the link to the evidence you attempted to dismis the point by saying:

what person of any consequence was involved with your link. You lie, and then choose random, angry people to make your feeble case.

As we have now seen in NYC these people who you say are of no consequence are of a great deal of consequence.

The democrats have profited from creating a false narrative so vile that there are thousands of black people enraged calling for the death of the police.

The guy who shot the two cops in Queens was spouting the same rhetoric as justification for the shooting.

And TopGun, your attempt to pass it off as merely a random criminal shooting cops in the course of his 'career' is a pathetic move on your part. This murderous asshat was quite obviously consumed by the narrative that you are trying to suggest had no part in his motivation.

You and slick are partly responsible for the rhetorical narrative that drives the rage that caused the murders.

[CUDA]

[woodchip]

Sharpton is back tracking now but his racial verbal pandemics are out of the bag, the result of which are the deaths of these 2 cops. Hope you're happy rev. Al...along with your instigating friend in the white house.

A career criminal and certifiable nutjob kills two officers, and somehow people who spoke up about possibly-questionable police tactics are to blame? Give me a ★■◆●ing break woody. Weren't you just the one deriding people for milking a tragedy?

How am I milking it? Unlike Rev Al I make not a dime off of what I post. As to your comment about people who spoke up. I'm not criticizing those who legitimately questioned police tactics. I hold to blame those who fomented violence against police. Obviously this is what legitimized the "nut jobs" rational to kill cops.
The shooter in Sandy Hook, the shooter in the movie house and the shooters at the Colorado H.S. did not have mobs calling for the deaths of movie goers or students. With the police shootings we had mobs calling for the deaths of police. So I suggest TG, that you understand better what is going on instead of making a ignorant knee jerk reply.

[CUDA]

WHOOPS, another black teen killed in St. Louis. this time there is Video.
probably wont hear from the race baiter Sharpton on this one.