this is what struggling with logic looks like

callmeslick · Post by **callmeslick** » Tue Feb 10, 2015 7:33 am

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/sau ... ar-AA9cEOj

and these are the folks who the US panders to in the Middle East.

vision · Post by **vision** » Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:43 pm

Ok look, the US isn't pandering to just that guy. It's clear from the article his views are considered absurd by the hosts, which indicates there is a strong moral divide in the country. As much as I dislike Saudi Arabia I'm not ready to dismiss them out of hand because of this moron. The 21st Century is going to be a big one for human rights in the Middle East. Imagine the civil rights movement here in the 60s times 1000. That's what I predict.

Tunnelcat · Post by **Tunnelcat** » Tue Feb 10, 2015 3:26 pm

And then there's our country, which must be more enlightened and modern thinking than some backwards Muslim country....NOT.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/1 ... -from-god/

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... legal.html

woodchip · Post by **woodchip** » Tue Feb 10, 2015 3:51 pm

And then there is:

Andrea Rita Dworkin, feminist
In the book, she argues that all heterosexual sex in our patriarchal society is coercive and degrading to women, and sexual penetration may by its very nature doom women to inferiority and submission

Spidey · Post by **Spidey** » Tue Feb 10, 2015 3:59 pm

Stop it Woody…even the mention of that name makes me want to puke my guts up.

woodchip · Post by **woodchip** » Tue Feb 10, 2015 6:23 pm

Would it make you feel better if I posted her picture?

Sergeant Thorne · Post by **Sergeant Thorne** » Tue Feb 10, 2015 6:43 pm

woodchip wrote:Would it make you feel better if I posted her picture?

LOL

Tunnelcat · Post by **Tunnelcat** » Tue Feb 10, 2015 6:48 pm

Just as there are extreme feminists, there are extreme paternalists. I just don't ascribe to either.

callmeslick · Post by **callmeslick** » Tue Feb 10, 2015 7:59 pm

extremes are always potentially dangerous, and generally humorous....

woodchip · Post by **woodchip** » Wed Feb 11, 2015 6:00 am

callmeslick wrote:extremes are always potentially dangerous, and generally humorous....

Then why bring them up as though they mean something?

callmeslick · Post by **callmeslick** » Wed Feb 11, 2015 7:38 am

you don't think dangerous thought is worth 'bringing up', Woody?

woodchip · Post by **woodchip** » Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:56 am

Why bring up something that is meaningless other than to try and paint one side of the political spectrum in a particular manner.

callmeslick · Post by **callmeslick** » Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:12 am

I enjoyed how this guy got trapped in his own narrative when confronted with logical questions. YMMV.

Ferno · Post by **Ferno** » Wed Feb 11, 2015 6:50 pm

callmeslick wrote:http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/sau ... ar-AA9cEOj

and these are the folks who the US panders to in the Middle East.

I read three sentences, then threw up.

hilariously stupid.

Spidey · Post by **Spidey** » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:10 am

“Johnny wants pussy in cars”

Ferno · Post by **Ferno** » Thu Feb 12, 2015 8:12 pm

oh god dworkin, aaaagh

*words give way to ten minute long profanity-filled braindump*

this is what struggling with logic looks like

this is what struggling with logic looks like

Re: this is what struggling with logic looks like

Re: this is what struggling with logic looks like

Re: this is what struggling with logic looks like

Re: this is what struggling with logic looks like

Re: this is what struggling with logic looks like

Re: this is what struggling with logic looks like

Re: this is what struggling with logic looks like

Re: this is what struggling with logic looks like

Re: this is what struggling with logic looks like

Re: this is what struggling with logic looks like

Re: this is what struggling with logic looks like

Re: this is what struggling with logic looks like

Re: this is what struggling with logic looks like

Re: this is what struggling with logic looks like

Re: this is what struggling with logic looks like