Capitol Evacuated due to False Airplane Scare
Capitol Evacuated due to False Airplane Scare
Wow, take a look at this. Apparently, the US Capitol building was evacuated due to reports of an incoming plane. Apparently, the plane that was carrying the Kentucky governor had a radio malfunction when it entered the restricted airspace over Washington. Must have been some pretty scary stuff.
Because the piece of equipment that was malfuncitoning was his transponder. Its pretty passive from the pilot's point of view so he's not really gonna know if it's working or not. He just dials in a number which then allows ATC to identify him on the radar screen.
Probably more info than you wanted, but oh well.
Probably more info than you wanted, but oh well.
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9781
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
Either you're very bad at sarcasm, Coug, or you seriously need a reality check.
The senator's plane was flying unidentified through highly restricted airspace above the capital of the United States of America (though the pilot was given clearance to do so, the transponder was broken and not transmitting an ID tag so ATC had no idea what plane it was). The pilot didn't (can can't) notice that the transponder malfunction occurred. What would you expect the ground people to do? Just leave it alone?!
The senator's plane was flying unidentified through highly restricted airspace above the capital of the United States of America (though the pilot was given clearance to do so, the transponder was broken and not transmitting an ID tag so ATC had no idea what plane it was). The pilot didn't (can can't) notice that the transponder malfunction occurred. What would you expect the ground people to do? Just leave it alone?!
That's paranoid alright. Paranoid of being held accountable after the fact for not doing "anything possible to prevent another terrorist attack". If you were in charge, would you want to risk a lynching for not doing anything in that situation, even if you knew that the likelyhood of something happening was nil?Cougar wrote:Tell me that's not just a little paranoid.
What Arch said.
How could anyone find fault in a successful evacuation responding to an alarm, even if it was a false alarm? Frankly, I believe there should be a few more drills to get everyone on the same page as far as what to expect and how to react. That's what saves lives in the event of a real attack. This isn't circa 1950s bomb shelters feeding on peoples fears, this is real to us in the USA after 9/11 and I'm glad to see folks are still taking it seriously.
How could anyone find fault in a successful evacuation responding to an alarm, even if it was a false alarm? Frankly, I believe there should be a few more drills to get everyone on the same page as far as what to expect and how to react. That's what saves lives in the event of a real attack. This isn't circa 1950s bomb shelters feeding on peoples fears, this is real to us in the USA after 9/11 and I'm glad to see folks are still taking it seriously.
D'oh. Had to go to work before I could get that working properly. Anyway. The only thing I have a real problem with is the bull-★■◆● the US people have had to deal with over the past few years. My venting was a bit misdirected, obviously.
I'll give that a big 'meh'.Arch wrote:Its offical Coug, you're an idiot.